BIG NEWS: Pawoo.net, the world's 2nd biggest Mastodon instance, has just been acquired.

The entity acquiring them is the Mask Group, a business that also runs mstdn.jp and mastodon.cloud. They are also active in the so-called "Web 3.0" space.

If you haven't heard of pawoo.net, it's because many instances have de-federated from it.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/mask-network-acquires-pawoo-net-070000858.html

Yahooist Teil der Yahoo Markenfamilie

Like it or not, it should no longer be assumed that "volunteers" are running your instances.

The Mask Group, which now runs three large instances "has raised over US$50 million from private and institutional backers"—their words not mine.

Mask Network Acquires Pawoo.net, one of the largest Mastodon instances

/PRNewswire/ -- The Social Coop Limited (Social Coop), the entity affiliated with Mask Network has acquired Pawoo.net, one of the largest Mastodon instances....

@bullivant This is a land grab, pure and simple.

@atomicpoet @bullivant They may try to copy what Truth Social is doing & insert ads within people’s timelines.

Even though there are corporate-owned instances, it is particularly jarring that a corporate overlord assimilates instances now.

But I think we will see more of this for one reason: Twitter is dying, so companies are trying to “buy the next Twitter” instead of building one.

@darnell @bullivant And they'd be mad not to build on the Fediverse. The hardest part about building any social network is validating the network effect. ActivityPub solves that problem.

@atomicpoet @bullivant I agree. We might see corporations target #Pixelfed instances next.

Also, #Mastodon admins are going to receive lucrative offers soon, & some might sell if they are unable to pay operational costs for their servers.

It will become critical for members to support their local servers.

My #HotTake:

#Mastodon #admins **should** place a _low-power_ #crypto #miner in the #timeline so _some_ of the **distributed** idle-CPU time can be _donated to the instance_ to pay for #hosting costs.

Why: Hosting costs money. Big companies have money, and I'd rather my money be the #voice of my instance than a for-profit.

If it is _opt-in per visit_, then #users **and** guests may (A) #donate towards covering server maintenance costs (and use CPU time and power), or (B) #decline to mine and use the service without sharing CPU time.

Anyone who deems an instance beneficial **CAN** contribute to keeping it alive. On power-constrained devices, users **may** opt out.

- **If you have money, donate to your instance to keep #BigBusiness out of it!**
- If you don't have money . . . hope we get an _opt-in crypto miner_ in the timeline?

Thoughts?
Stereophonic

@whetkey Or they could just donate money‽ 🤷🏾‍♂️
@darnell I'm thinking of people, like myself, who live paycheck-to-paycheck (thanks to economic changes). I have a decent computer, but no money. If I leave my browser open, I'm OK with the CPU giving some "money" to the maintainers of the services I use.
@whetkey Fair point. I guess if your admin accepts crypto then by all means run your idea past them as they might accept your offer.