Silicon Valley wants to turn us into Star Trek Borg. They don't quite put it that way, but that's what it would ultimately amount to.
Do you want crazed Trump broligarchs messing with your brain?
#NeuralImplants #ChipsInBrains #SiliconValley #StarTrek #TheBorg #Neuralink #broligarchs #neurorights #neuralData
田中義弘 | taziku CEO / AI × Creative (@taziku_co)
BCI 발전에 따라 입력 장치의 개념이 재정의될 수 있다는 내용입니다. Sabi가 세계 최대 규모의 신경 데이터셋을 모으고 Brain Foundation Model을 학습 중이며, 현재는 분당 30단어 수준이지만 향후 기기 사용 방식 전반에 큰 변화를 줄 가능성을 제시합니다.
https://x.com/taziku_co/status/2044988573297025042
#bci #brainfoundationmodel #neuraldata #inputdevices #airesearch
A new law in California protects consumers’ brain data. Some think it doesn’t go far enough
The bill defines neural data as “information that is generated by measuring the activity of a consumer’s central or peripheral nervous system, and that is not inferred from nonneural information.” In other words, data collected from a person’s brain or nerves.
#CCPA #BrainData #MentalPrivacy #NeuralData #privacy #surveillance #data #bigdata #biometrics #technology #tech
#California Passes Law Protecting Consumer #Brain Data
The state extended its current personal #privacy law to include the neural data increasingly coveted by technology companies.
#neuraldata
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/29/science/california-neurorights-tech-law.html
Your Brain Waves Are Up for Sale. A New Law Wants to Change That.
In a first, a #Colorado law extends #privacy rights to the #NeuralData increasingly coveted by technology companies.
Gift article: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/17/science/colorado-brain-data-privacy.html?unlocked_article_code=1.lE0._Fwh.Tt-a8B1EVTS1
Endless feedback - by Rob Horning - Internal exile https://robhorning.substack.com/p/endless-feedback
> Ideally one would be compelled to wear some sort of #brainwave monitor that would broadcast #neuraldata directly to #corporateservers somewhere, as suggested by #MarkZuckerberg’s enthusiasm for brain-reading machines.
#surveillance #surveillancecapitalism
--
No wonder the #fediverse is against federating with #Meta, this is an essential reminder of what they are about.
In 2013, Facebook data scientist Adam Kremer and intern Sauvik Das published “Self-Censorship on Facebook,” a paper which was to spark some controversy. Not only did the authors repeatedly make the confounding assertion that “the act of preventing oneself from speaking” — i.e., starting to write a Facebook post but then not posting it — was “censorship,” a kind of self-imposed masochistic tyranny rather than privacy, reticence, or good sense; but their methodology also revealed that Facebook retained the data that users input but never posted. Anything typed into a box on Facebook was fair game for the company to do whatever they wanted with, regardless of whether the user ultimately intended to share it with others. Thus while one’s privacy settings may apply to other users, they didn’t apply to the platform itself, which tracked and stored whatever user behavior it could, wherever it could. Nothing a user could do could get anything removed from that database, and their intuitions about what was included in it were likely to be insufficient.
Tim Zee
sayzard
The-14
gtbarry
PrivacyDigest
Gina Intheburg 🇺🇦 🌻 🥥🌴
Matija