Why Local and State Police Rarely Investigate Federal Agents – ProPublica

FBI agents at the scene of the shooting death of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis on Jan. 24.
Peter DiCampo / ProPublica

Donate, Donate Search ProPublica:

InfoAbout Us, Impact, Jobs & Fellowships, Contact Us

Follow ProPublica

FBI agents at the scene of the shooting death of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis on Jan. 24.
Peter DiCampo / ProPublica

Criminal Justice

“You’re Not Going to Investigate a Federal Officer”

It doesn’t happen often, but local law enforcement can arrest and charge federal agents. Legal experts say there’s a moral obligation to at least try to hold federal immigration officers accountable when they violate the Constitution and the law.

by Andy Mannix, Melissa Sanchez and Nicole Foy

February 5, 2026, 6:00 am

Minutes after a federal agent shot and killed a Mexican immigrant in a Chicago suburb last September, a group of police officers stood on the sidewalk trying to figure out the answer to a question of protocol: Who would investigate the shooting?

“Wouldn’t it be state’s, at a minimum?” one Franklin Park officer asked, according to body camera footage.

Chief Mike Witz shook his head. “No, because it’s a federal shooting,” he said. “You’re not going to investigate a federal officer.”

His officers didn’t investigate. In their report, they didn’t even note the names of the two Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents at the scene of Silverio Villegas González’s death. Instead, they deferred to the FBI.

Local law enforcement officials also did not investigate when a Border Patrol agent shot and wounded a U.S. citizen in her car in Chicago less than a month later. Or when an ICE agent in Phoenix shot a Honduran man during a traffic stop later that month.

In fact, local police did not open investigations into six of the 12 shootings by on-duty federal agents that have led to the deaths or injuries of citizens and immigrants since September, a ProPublica analysis found. In three other shooting cases, state or local police said they have opened inquiries, which they called a routine practice in those jurisdictions. And in Minnesota, where ICE and Border Patrol shot and killed two U.S. citizens and injured a Venezuelan man last month, state police have tried to conduct independent investigations only to be thwarted by the Trump administration, which has gone so far as to block officers from a scene, even when they had a judicial warrant.

In almost every instance, President Donald Trump’s administration blamed the injured and dead for the shooting within hours of the incident, raising questions about whether federal officials can fairly and objectively investigate their own. Legal experts and advocates for immigrants say this apparent lack of accountability demands that local authorities step up and exercise their power to investigate and prosecute federal agents who break state laws — from battery to murder.

“Local police and the state have gotten a free pass,” said Craig Futterman, a law professor at the University of Chicago and the co-founder and director of its Civil Rights and Police Accountability Project. “Residents have every right and should be demanding that, ‘Hey, state authorities, police, local police: Protect us. Arrest people who kill us, who batter us, who point guns at us and threaten and assault us without legal cause to do so.’”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXw9k7JWufI

Body camera footage shows then-Franklin Park Police Chief Mike Witz responding to his officers’ questions about whether they would investigate the shooting of a Mexican immigrant by federal agents. Obtained by ProPublica

It’s usually the opposite scenario: federal authorities coming in to investigate a troubled police department. But local authorities have investigated and charged federal agents in the past. It’s just rare and complicated. The federal supremacy clause in the U.S. Constitution bars local interference with federal law enforcement officers when they act reasonably and within the scope of their duties.

But given the aggressive tactics employed by immigration agents under the Trump administration, Futterman and other legal experts said local police and prosecutors are morally obligated to at least try to hold federal law enforcement officers accountable.

“We’re in an environment right now where ICE officers are blatantly and egregiously violating the Constitution and the law,” said Joanna Schwartz, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles. “The federal government has made it very clear that they are not going to do anything to provide any sort of accountability backstop to its officers. Unfortunately, because Congress is not taking any steps to rein ICE officers in, there really is no option other than states protecting their constituents’ rights.” 

Continue/Read Original Article Here: Why Local and State Police Rarely Investigate Federal Agents — ProPublica

Tags: Alex Jeffrey Pretti, Chicago, CPB, FBI, Federal Agents, Gonzalez Death, ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Investigate, January 24 2026, Local Police, Minneapolis, Moral Obligation, ProPublica, Rule of Law, State Police, Trump, Trump Administration, Violate Constitution, Why, YouTube
#AlexJeffreyPretti #Chicago #CPB #FBI #FederalAgents #GonzalezDeath #ICE #ImmigrationAndCustomsEnforcementICE #Investigate #January242026 #LocalPolice #Minneapolis #MoralObligation #ProPublica #RuleOfLaw #StatePolice #Trump #TrumpAdministration #ViolateConstitution #Why #YouTube

Do businesses that make billions off of consumers have a moral obligation to give back? On a personal level, do you only take without giving back?

#MoralObligation #BusinessEthics #Consumerism #ThoughtExperiment

A quotation from Washington

The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and to alter their Constitutions of Government. But the Constitution which at any time exists, ’till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole People, is sacredly obligatory upon all. The very idea of the power and the right of the People to establish Government presupposes the duty of every Individual to obey the established Government.

George Washington (1732-1799) American military leader, Founding Father, US President (1789-1797)
Essay (1796-09-17), “Farewell Address,” Claypoole’s American Daily Advertiser, Philadelphia (1796-09-19)

Sourcing, notes: wist.info/washington-george/72…

#quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #washington #georgewashington #Constitution #democracy #government #obligation #duty #power #sacredness #selfdetermination #moralobligation

Everyone who looks at the political landscape and refuses to see that fascism is on the rise again (and that America is playing a leading role this time) needs to take a long hard look into the mirror.

It's happening in plain sight and you need to stop your reality refusal. It's time to act. Get involved in local activism. Get involved in politics. Resist. Fight. It's not necessarily your freedom that's on the line ... yet. But when it comes to that nobody might be left to speak up for you. Speak up now before it's too late!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came

#politics #fascism #activism #moralObligation #resistance

First They Came - Wikipedia

I just published a new blog post, where I share how small gestures, community engagement, and unwavering core principles can build resilience and spark meaningful change. Please have a look and let me know your thoughts!

Link: https://roqueneto.com/2025/02/11/hope-is-the-willingness-to-try-again/

#Hope #MoralObligation #Leadership #SocialImpact #Espoir #Esperanza #Hoop #Hoffnung

Hope is the Willingness to Try Again

Noticing everyday positive moments can help shift these feelings. Perhaps you spot a volunteer group gathering supplies for those in need or a friend raising local issues with elected officials. Re…

Roque Neto

Doctors Have a Moral Obligation to Disobey Abortion Bans — Academic medical centers’ lackluster defense of abortion access is moral malpractice. It’s time for civil disobedience.

https://truthout.org/articles/doctors-have-a-moral-obligation-to-disobey-abortion-bans/

#AbortionBans #MoralObligation #CivilDisobedience #AcademicMedicalCenters #AbortionAccess #MoralMalpractice #Politics #News

Doctors Have a Moral Obligation to Disobey Abortion Bans

Academic medical centers’ lackluster defense of abortion access is moral malpractice. It’s time for civil disobedience.

Truthout

A quotation from #Gandhi:

«««««
In my humble opinion, noncooperation with evil is as much a duty as is cooperation with good.
»»»»»

Full quote, sourcing, notes:
https://wist.info/gandhi-mahatma/61161/

#quote #quotes #quotation #cooperation #evil #good #moralduty #moralobligation #noncooperation

Why so much bullshit? Money?
> The characteristic work of the novel is to record the illusion that snobbery generates and to try to penetrate to the truth which, as the novel assumes, lies hidden beneath all the false appearances. #Money, #Snobbery the ideal of status, these become in themselves the objects of fantasy, the support of the fantasies of love, freedom, charm, power...
#LionelTrilling in the book, The #MoralObligation #ToBeIntelligent, essay,
#MannersMorals And #TheNovel
@[email protected]:

Countering Whataboutism and Misdirection on Aggressor Russia's Unprovoked Invasion of Sovereign Ukraine


I generally avoid giving disinformational propaganda any platform at all. Others ... don't always see that way, and I often find this frustrating and distracting. The goal of such propaganda is to weaken focus, engender confusion, and derail conversations. And it frequently succeeds in doing just this.

The Aggressor-Apologists' Arguments


A recent discussion provides a counterexample, in which the propaganda talking points are demolished one by one, revealing them for the void apologia they are. I'm rephrasing slightly here, with the statements as third--level headings:

1. I deliberately ignore the history here because it is not the salient information.


Rather than focus on the present conflcit, aggression, and violation of all international norms, standards, and treaties, this attack attempts to relitigate history. History isn't being litigated, the present is. Moreover, demanding that all be dictated terms by dead men of some past age ... with all the questions over which men and which age (and yes, it's virtually always men) ... only begs the question (in the true sense of that fallacy) of which past authorities should be considered.

2. I deliberately ignore that the biggest murderers of humanity because that is not what I am talking about here.


Again, the is a naked attempt to distract from the present and appeal to the past. A past, for what it's worth, which includes the overtly genocidal actions of the Soviet era to whose greatness Putin has been appealing over past days, weeks, months, and years, in which tens of millions were killed, starved, and/or imprisoned and enslaved.

Yes, there are other examples of genocides from other parties, including states of the West. I've mentioned several of those within recent months myself, here. Those genocides are acknowledged. Those are not the topic under discussion.

3. I ignore the fact that US clearly pushed this conflict because that is a lie. We know who made the decision to invade Ukraine, after many months of preparation.


This one addresses straight up falsehood, dismisses it, and points to the overt hypocrisy and bald-faced nature of the lie.

4. Ukrainians are not using themselves as a shield. This is the most absurd and wicked “blame the victim” accusation I have ever heard, as missiles and bombs rein down upon innocent people.


The genius of this response is that it makes clear that shields, as with missile defences, are reactive responses to acts of aggression and would not be relevant at all absent that aggression.

Keep these in mind should you see or encounter these, or similar arguments


No, you're not going to change the mind of a paid propaganda agent or indoctrinated useful idiot. But you will greatly blunt the effectiveness of their message.

Keep in mind too that propaganda relies heavily on the Big Lie. It's statements or assertions absurd on their face, repeated endlessly. This means that the arguments change and adapt relatively slowly, and are used in mass. Being able to rebut or pre-but the arguments greatly reduces their effectivenss, and those living in regimes of law, information, and media where we are able to do so with minimal risk or consequence for speaking truth to power should and are morally obligated to do so.

h/t @tomgrzyb

#Ukraine #Russia #Propaganda #Counterarguments #Whataboutism #Misdirection #Responses #Sophistry #SophisticalRefutations #TruthToPower #VladimirPutin #AggressorRussia #MoralObligation #Morality
Countering Whataboutism and Misdirection on Aggressor Russia's Unpr...

Countering Whataboutism and Misdirection on Aggressor Russia's Unprovoked Invasion of Sovereign Ukraine I generally avoid giving disinformational propaganda any platform at all. Others ... don't always see that way, and I often find this frustrating and distracting. The goal of such propaganda is to weaken focus, engender confusion, and derail conversations. And it frequently succeeds in doing just this. The Aggressor-Apologists' Arguments A recent discussion provides a counterexample, in which the propaganda talking points are demolished one by one, revealing them for the void apologia they are. I'm rephrasing slightly here, with the statements as third--level headings: 1. I deliberately ignore the history here because it is not the salient information. Rather than focus on the present conflcit, aggression, and violation of all international norms, standards, and treaties, this attack attempts to relitigate history. History isn't being litigated, the present is. Moreover, dem...

Glass Wings diaspora* social network