A new cohort of Ukrainian media experts have joined the MERIT Forum.

The initiative connects Ukrainian media professionals with experts from Denmark, EU institutions and international partners, creating a shared space for advancing #media resilience, deepening an understanding of Ukrainian and EU media legislation and promoting human rights based approaches to media governance.
Read more about the current participants: https://www.mediasupport.org/news/merit-forum-2026-who-are-this-years-voices-of-ukraine/

The MERIT Forum is a component of IMS’s Eastern Partnership programme REACH: Media Partnerships for Accountability and Trust, funded by the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

#informationintegrity #ukraine

Ukrainian media outlets that, in the fourth year of the war, continue to reproduce the uninformative commentary of *BILD* and specifically Julian Röpcke, must confront an uncomfortable truth: the uncritical citation of these materials contributes nothing of analytical value to the country’s public discourse. Over several years of full-scale war, this platform has failed to offer substantive insight, meaningful investigative work, or any contribution that would improve public understanding of the strategic situation.
The continued replication of such content within an already unsettled society exacerbates anxiety rather than informing the public. This practice undermines national resilience and substitutes both analysis and responsibility with mechanical repetition.
Recent claims by *BILD* that Russia could allegedly capture “900 square kilometers this month” illustrate a broader pattern: assertions presented without methodological grounding, empirical transparency, or strategic context. Amplifying such predictions without scrutiny degrades journalistic standards and misleads audiences at moments when precision is crucial.
In the 1860s, Prussian political thinker August Ludwig von Rochau described journalists as the “watchdogs of democracy,” whose purpose was not passive transcription but the vigilant safeguarding of society through investigation, verification, and informed commentary. Journalism, in this sense, is an intellectual profession requiring independent judgement, contextual awareness, and analytical discipline.
Had these principles been consistently upheld, the public sphere would not rely on a proliferation of nominal “experts” who alternate between performative hyper-patriotism and equally unreflective defeatism. The current failure to cultivate analytical journalism reflects not a lack of capacity but a stagnation of professional standards.
The function of the press — especially during wartime — is not to amplify external conjectures but to produce well-grounded, evidence-based analysis that strengthens the public’s understanding rather than eroding it.
**References**
(Neutral contextual sources)
August Ludwig von Rochau, *Grundsätze der Realpolitik*.
Archive: https://archive.org/details/grundsatze-realpolitik
Coverage and criticism of *BILD* during wartime reporting.
DW Analysis: https://www.dw.com/en/bild-germany-media-criticism
Media responsibility and conflict-era communication studies.
Journal of Media History: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/jmh
Research on misinformation dynamics in wartime media.
ICFJ: https://www.icfj.org/research
**Hashtags**
#MediaStudies #InformationIntegrity #JournalismEthics #WartimeReporting #Ukraine #BILD #Röpcke #VonRochau #PressFreedom #StrategicCommunications #AcademicMastodon #Quot #MediaAnalysis #DemocraticWatchdogs

Over 200 organisations and another 200+ individuals are urging that “Climate Action Requires Truth: COP30 Must Codify Information Integrity” — https://caad.info/analysis/reports/cop30-open-letter/
#ClimateDisinfo #InformationIntegrity #COP30