Fedora Kinoite, in prior months when i was setting it up, ALL attempts to be able to connect to Dad's pc with either AnyDesk or RustDesk, via either Flatpaks & overlaid rpm pkgs, failed. Hence, now in Tower's KDELinux i've not even bothered with those two flatpaks, not to mention that this atomic does not have a(n easy) way to overlay. Happily i found recently that AppImage works well for VeraCrypt in KDELinux, so i wondered if any of AnyDesk, RustDesk, or NoMachine might have an AI option... & yes, RD does! Aaaaaaand... it works - both for remote-access desktop control, & for file-transfer - yippee! KDELinux, which hitherto stopped this otherwise lovely OS being able to be my fulltime daily system [remote-access ✅, VeraCrypt ✅, backups ✅, virtual machines ✅], i tentatively now conclude that henceforth i'll only boot back into either Arch or Sparky when i want to, rather than til now each time i needed to [for the preceding issues] 🎉 🥳 👯♀️KDELinux [but no other DB] remains galling [not least that coz it does not work i had to find other ways to solve those tricky app issues], but now it is no longer significantly holding me back.
#ArchLinux #KDEPlasma
#KDELinux
#SparkyLinux
#Kalpa
#Kinoite@transicorn @Kroc While I like #flatpaks in general, they are still suffering from growing pains. Once #flatpak support is enabled, any logged in user can install additional flatpak software regardless of the system admin's desire. This leads to much abuse. I can't keep my kids from installing minecraft on our #homeschool computers. This is just the tame sort of abuse that can happen. Now think about this in a #corporate environment.
There needs to be a way of whitelisting/blacklisting apps.
Taking the liberty to cross-post my involvement with Fedora Flatpaks; originally posted on Fedora Discourse.
4 years ago, I discovered Fedora Flatpaks, and developed a strong interest with the tech and approach behind it. After having a thorough understanding of it, I wrote two detailed articles about Fedora Flatpaks:
Mind you, I also designed the banners (just highlighting how much I cared about promoting it back then).
I also asked to open a Matrix room (2022/01/01), which was rejected:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/matrix-room-request-for-fedora-flatpaks/35622
As time went by, I started losing interest, because there wasn’t much progress with the project, and it was duplicating effort that could have otherwise heavily benefited Flathub and every party involved (GNOME, KDE, elementary, freedesktop.org, Endless Foundation, etc.), which would have benefited Fedora, too.
This realization led me to write “Where Fedora Linux Could Improve § Only Ship Unfiltered Flathub by Default”, which criticized the lack of progress with it, as well as addressing one of the “legal concerns” (2022/12/06):
(Side note: I’ve also heard from Flathub folks that they received legal advice in regards to these issues.)
This led to some community members to react and start the Flatpak SIG project, to accelerate development — 2 days after my blog post (2022/12/08):
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=SIGs/Flatpak&oldid=662603
Then, a Matrix room was (finally) created and publicly available (2022/12/10):
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=SIGs/Flatpak&diff=prev&oldid=663009
By the way, I was never reached out or invited to join the SIG, despite putting in so much effort and time to accelerate development.
However, despite that, I still tried to participate in the project, and added myself to the SIG as well:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=SIGs/Flatpak&diff=prev&oldid=663089
Any of my suggestions then were either rejected with no proper explanation, shrugged off, or sent to /dev/null. And whenever I asked for source for obvious misinformation, it would be dismissed.
I tried to push Fedora Flatpaks in a direction that would have been less controversial and more productive by limiting its scope, which would also enable us to allocate more resources on other stuff. However, once again, I wasn’t really taken seriously; at least I personally don’t feel like so.
Eventually, I lost every last bit of interest and removed myself from the SIG (2023/02/20):
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=SIGs/Flatpak&diff=prev&oldid=669108
All this to say, I tried really hard to keep my opinions to myself, and communicate diplomatically with them; I even wrote articles after doing several hours of researches in the span of weeks to show my interest, but I was treated extremely unfairly in return. So this naturally led me to one conclusion which I still hold today: they’re not looking for diplomacy; they just want to do whatever they want, even if it ends up upsetting/hurting people and projects’ image — I have the same sentiment with RPM packagers, too.

Hey Jef, I really appreciate the thoughtful response over the situation. While I’m not a part of Flathub, I’m also grateful that you were considerate when raising concerns to them. I would like to point out that hostility can take in various forms, and can be performed by a small set of individuals within a large group. I sincerely believe that you and the majority of people in the Fedora community are amiable and want the best for everyone — emphasis on “majority”. This is unfortunately not th...
#DebianTrixie finds itself very close to the cutting edge even approx. six months after launch. Reasonably new kernel & #Plasma6 combined with #Flatpaks makes for a surprisingly useable OS.
Hot tip: Change fonts to #Inter and bump them up by one point each.