Ваш CLAUDE.md делает агента тупее. Исследование на 138 репозиториях это доказало

Полгода я собирал идеальный CLAUDE.md. Вычитывал каждую строку. Добавлял секции: «используй yarn, не npm», «тесты запускай так», «структура проекта вот такая». 200 строк чистого, выстраданного...

Static search trees: 40x faster than binary search

Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Problem statement 1.2 Motivation 1.3 Recommended reading 1.4 Binary search and Eytzinger layout 1.5 Hugepages 1.6 A note on benchmarking 1.7 Cache lines 1.8 S-trees and B-trees 2 Optimizing find 2.1 Linear 2.2 Auto-vectorization 2.3 Trailing zeros 2.4 Popcount 2.5 Manual SIMD 3 Optimizing the search 3.1 Batching 3.2 Prefetching 3.3 Pointer arithmetic 3.3.1 Up-front splat 3.3.2 Byte-based pointers 3.3.3 The final version 3.4 Skip prefetch 3.5 Interleave 4 Optimizing the tree layout 4.1 Left-tree 4.2 Memory layouts 4.3 Node size \(B=15\) 4.3.1 Data structure size 4.4 Summary 5 Prefix partitioning 5.1 Full layout 5.2 Compact subtrees 5.3 The best of both: compact first level 5.4 Overlapping trees 5.5 Human data 5.6 Prefix map 5.7 Summary 6 Multi-threaded comparison 7 Conclusion 7.1 Future work 7.1.1 Branchy search 7.1.2 Interpolation search 7.1.3 Packing data smaller 7.1.4 Returning indices in original data 7.1.5 Range queries 7.1.6 Sorting queries 7.1.7 Suffix array searching In this post, we will implement a static search tree (S+ tree) for high-throughput searching of sorted data, as introduced on Algorithmica. We’ll mostly take the code presented there as a starting point, and optimize it to its limits. For a large part, I’m simply taking the ‘future work’ ideas of that post and implementing them. And then there will be a bunch of looking at assembly code to shave off all the instructions we can. Lastly, there will be one big addition to optimize throughput: batching.

Static search trees: 40x faster than binary search

Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Problem statement 1.2 Motivation 1.3 Recommended reading 1.4 Binary search and Eytzinger layout 1.5 Hugepages 1.6 A note on benchmarking 1.7 Cache lines 1.8 S-trees and B-trees 2 Optimizing find 2.1 Linear 2.2 Auto-vectorization 2.3 Trailing zeros 2.4 Popcount 2.5 Manual SIMD 3 Optimizing the search 3.1 Batching 3.2 Prefetching 3.3 Pointer arithmetic 3.3.1 Up-front splat 3.3.2 Byte-based pointers 3.3.3 The final version 3.4 Skip prefetch 3.5 Interleave 4 Optimizing the tree layout 4.1 Left-tree 4.2 Memory layouts 4.3 Node size \(B=15\) 4.3.1 Data structure size 4.4 Summary 5 Prefix partitioning 5.1 Full layout 5.2 Compact subtrees 5.3 The best of both: compact first level 5.4 Overlapping trees 5.5 Human data 5.6 Prefix map 5.7 Summary 6 Multi-threaded comparison 7 Conclusion 7.1 Future work 7.1.1 Branchy search 7.1.2 Interpolation search 7.1.3 Packing data smaller 7.1.4 Returning indices in original data 7.1.5 Range queries 7.1.6 Sorting queries 7.1.7 Suffix array searching In this post, we will implement a static search tree (S+ tree) for high-throughput searching of sorted data, as introduced on Algorithmica. We’ll mostly take the code presented there as a starting point, and optimize it to its limits. For a large part, I’m simply taking the ‘future work’ ideas of that post and implementing them. And then there will be a bunch of looking at assembly code to shave off all the instructions we can. Lastly, there will be one big addition to optimize throughput: batching.

Weekly: Plastik-Zertifikate, Antimaterie transportieren, Videovorlesung „Cook the Science” - t3n – digital pioneers

Warum Plastik-Zertifikate nur eine Notlösung sind und wie man Antimaterie am besten transportiert, erfahrt ihr in unserer neuen Podcast-Folge.

Spot-Compose: A Framework for Open-Vocabulary Object Retrieval and Drawer Manipulation in Point Clouds

In recent years, modern techniques in deep learning and large-scale datasets have led to impressive progress in 3D instance segmentation, grasp pose estimation, and robotics. This allows for accurate detection directly in 3D scenes, object- and environment-aware grasp prediction, as well as robust and repeatable robotic manipulation. This work aims to integrate these recent methods into a comprehensive framework for robotic interaction and manipulation in human-centric environments. Specifically, we leverage 3D reconstructions from a commodity 3D scanner for open-vocabulary instance segmentation, alongside grasp pose estimation, to demonstrate dynamic picking of objects, and opening of drawers. We show the performance and robustness of our model in two sets of real-world experiments including dynamic object retrieval and drawer opening, reporting a 51% and 82% success rate respectively. Code of our framework as well as videos are available on: https://spot-compose.github.io/.

Frauen in der Informatik – Wikipedia

29 Feb 24 - Shufflecake: plausible deniability for multiple hidden filesystems on Linux

Dr. Tommaso Gagliardoni