Hacker Newshttps://curiouscoding.nl/posts/static-search-tree/
#ycombinator #blog #developer #phd #computational_biology #dna #sequencing #personal #bmi #eth #ethz #eth_zurich #pairwise_alignment
Static search trees: 40x faster than binary search
Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Problem statement 1.2 Motivation 1.3 Recommended reading 1.4 Binary search and Eytzinger layout 1.5 Hugepages 1.6 A note on benchmarking 1.7 Cache lines 1.8 S-trees and B-trees 2 Optimizing find 2.1 Linear 2.2 Auto-vectorization 2.3 Trailing zeros 2.4 Popcount 2.5 Manual SIMD 3 Optimizing the search 3.1 Batching 3.2 Prefetching 3.3 Pointer arithmetic 3.3.1 Up-front splat 3.3.2 Byte-based pointers 3.3.3 The final version 3.4 Skip prefetch 3.5 Interleave 4 Optimizing the tree layout 4.1 Left-tree 4.2 Memory layouts 4.3 Node size \(B=15\) 4.3.1 Data structure size 4.4 Summary 5 Prefix partitioning 5.1 Full layout 5.2 Compact subtrees 5.3 The best of both: compact first level 5.4 Overlapping trees 5.5 Human data 5.6 Prefix map 5.7 Summary 6 Multi-threaded comparison 7 Conclusion 7.1 Future work 7.1.1 Branchy search 7.1.2 Interpolation search 7.1.3 Packing data smaller 7.1.4 Returning indices in original data 7.1.5 Range queries 7.1.6 Sorting queries 7.1.7 Suffix array searching In this post, we will implement a static search tree (S+ tree) for high-throughput searching of sorted data, as introduced on Algorithmica. We’ll mostly take the code presented there as a starting point, and optimize it to its limits. For a large part, I’m simply taking the ‘future work’ ideas of that post and implementing them. And then there will be a bunch of looking at assembly code to shave off all the instructions we can. Lastly, there will be one big addition to optimize throughput: batching.