𝑬𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒏 𝑻𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒏: 𝒍𝒂 𝒎𝒖𝒋𝒆𝒓 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒗𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒐́ 𝒆𝒏 𝒍𝒂 𝒔𝒐𝒎𝒃𝒓𝒂 𝒅𝒆 𝑫𝒊𝒄𝒌𝒆𝒏𝒔  

En la penumbra de un teatro londinense, iluminada por candiles, una joven actriz recitaba sus líneas sin imaginar que su vida daría un giro brutal.
Su nombre era Ellen Ternan.
Y aunque durante mucho tiempo fue recordada solo como “la amante de Charles Dickens”, su historia es bastante más incómoda… y mucho más humana.

Nació el 3 de marzo de 1839 en Rochester, en una familia de actores.
Desde niña vivió entre bambalinas, giras y escenarios.
No era una vida fácil ni especialmente glamurosa: mucho viaje, poco dinero y un futuro bastante incierto, sobre todo para una mujer en ese mundo.

Todo cambió en 1857.

Ellen tenía 18 años. Dickens, 45.
Se conocieron en una obra benéfica y él quedó completamente fascinado.
No fue algo discreto desde el principio, aunque se intentara disimular después.
Porque Dickens no era cualquiera: era el escritor más famoso de su tiempo… y estaba casado.

Su matrimonio con Catherine Dickens llevaba años roto por dentro, pero lo que hizo después no fue precisamente elegante.

En pocos meses, la relación con Ellen pasó de admiración a algo mucho más serio.
Y Dickens tomó una decisión radical: separarse de su esposa.
Pero no fue una separación tranquila ni respetuosa.

Aquí viene uno de los episodios más duros.

El famoso “brazalete del escándalo”.
Dickens compró una joya para Ellen, pero por error llegó a casa de Catherine.
Cuando ella lo recibió, él no solo mintió diciendo que era para una actriz por motivos “profesionales”, sino que la obligó a ir personalmente a entregárselo a Ellen.
Humillación en toda regla.

Y no se quedó ahí.

En 1858, Dickens forzó la separación con Catherine mediante una campaña bastante fea: la aisló, la difamó públicamente como madre negligente y la apartó de varios de sus hijos.
Incluso llegó a dividir físicamente su dormitorio con un tabique.
Al final, Catherine fue prácticamente expulsada de la casa familiar.

Mientras tanto, Ellen quedaba en la sombra.

La sociedad victoriana no perdonaba este tipo de cosas, y mucho menos a una mujer joven.
Dickens lo sabía, así que hizo todo lo posible por ocultarla: le alquiló una casa lejos de Londres, organizaba encuentros discretos, viajes en secreto… una relación real, pero siempre escondida.

Y hubo momentos en los que todo estuvo a punto de salir a la luz.

En 1865 ocurrió el accidente de tren de Staplehurst.
Dickens y Ellen viajaban juntos cuando el tren descarriló en un puente.
Él la ayudó a salir de entre los restos… y luego, en un gesto muy suyo, volvió al vagón medio colgando para recuperar el manuscrito de Nuestro amigo común.
Sobrevivieron, pero Dickens quedó obsesionado con una cosa: que se descubriera que Ellen viajaba con él.

Ese miedo no era exagerado.

La relación siguió durante años, siempre en secreto.
Algunos biógrafos creen que pudieron tener un hijo, aunque no hay pruebas sólidas.
Lo que sí está claro es que Ellen vivió una vida doble constante.

También se cree que ella inspiró personajes como Estella en Grandes esperanzas: joven, distante, casi inaccesible.
Tiene sentido si piensas en la relación desigual que tenían.

Cuando Dickens murió en 1870, Ellen quedó en una posición complicada.
No podía reclamar nada públicamente sin destruir su propia reputación.
Así que hizo lo único posible: desaparecer.

Pero antes, hubo otra capa de silencio.

Tras la muerte del escritor, su entorno —familia y amigos— se encargó de borrar rastros.
Cartas quemadas, documentos destruidos… una limpieza en toda regla para proteger la imagen del gran Dickens.
Ellen también colaboró en ese silencio.
Sabía perfectamente lo que estaba en juego.

En 1876, rehízo su vida.

Se casó con George Wharton Robinson, un hombre 12 años más joven.
Y aquí viene otro detalle bastante fuerte: le ocultó su pasado.
Incluso mintió sobre su edad para que las fechas no cuadraran.
Su vida con Dickens quedó enterrada… al menos en apariencia.

Murió el 25 de abril de 1914, llevándose consigo muchos de esos secretos.

Durante décadas, fue poco más que una nota al pie en la historia de Dickens.
Pero con el tiempo, su figura se ha revisado.
Ya no se la ve solo como “la amante”, sino como una mujer atrapada en una situación donde no tenía mucho margen de maniobra.

Porque sí, hubo amor.

Pero también hubo poder, desigualdad, silencio… y una sociedad que no perdonaba a quien se salía del guion.

Y al final, como pasa muchas veces, la historia la escribió él.

Y ella tuvo que vivir con eso.

▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣

#historia #curiosidades #sigloxix #literatura #charlesdickens #mujeresenlahistoria #historiasreales #dramahistorico

Movie TV Tech Geeks #TVNews #KitHarington #CharlesDickens #MGM Kit Harington Leads MGM+'s 4-Part 'A Tale of Two Cities' Miniseries in New First Look [Exclusive] http://dlvr.it/TRgbz3

Non è tranquilla, signore, l’acqua dove dormono certi pensieri. E’ profonda, e il fondo non si scorge.

Charles Dickens

frammento da David Copperfield, Rizzoli 1957

#CharlesDickens #libri #cctmwebsite #anoipiaceleggere #leggere

7. Book 1. The Bible (100-200 CE) Month 4 – April

So continue the reading challenge and now I’ve passed some of the traditional bible stories I know and I’ve been reading every day for three months it is starting to become a bit tedious. However not long into the fourth month I found myself shocked – I literally stopped in my tracks – to hear the words

“whoever has will be given more, and he will have an abundance. Whoever does not have an abundance what he has will be taken from him”

I had been following (or trying to as best I could) to follow the principles of “the secret” as written about by Rhona Byrne. During a time of despair and difficulty for my family I had picked this book up to try and change my outlook on life. This book talk about practicing gratitude and positive vibrations in the universe. The book promotes the ideas that feeling and showing gratitude can have a positive domino effect on  the rest of you life, and that you end up receiving what you desire. Since reading this book I have been practicing gratitude (albeit in peaks and troughs) for about 5 years. I hadn’t fully grasped – or subconsciously chosen to ignore – the fact that this was taken from the scripture in the Bible.

So the secret is just part of the bible then, while I was sure that it had come from the teaching of a learned man, perhaps a religious man, I hadn’t actually realised it was part of the Bible.  After reading this line in the bible my initial thoughts were confused. I thought that either Rhonda was naïve and didn’t realise this was from the Bible (could that actually be possible?). Or was she just using this as a vehicle to convert people to Christianity and teach “the word of god”?  Was the author just literal and had done no real research before writing the book or is this book  just another way to spread religious doctrine?

Initially I was annoyed that I had been following the secret for 5 years and I had actually been following teachings of the Bible all this time. As you may have gathered from my previous blogs I have been continually shocked, enraged and saddened by the mixed messaging – including the repentance required of the people, the immovability of “gods law” and a lack of forgiveness by “god”. There are many teachings encouraging intolerance, harsh punishment, violence, genocide, slavery, oppression of women, oppression of different groups of people  as well as the need to follow a range of, what seems to me ridiculous, instructions as “laws”.

I think part of the reason I was so annoyed was also due to the fact that “the secret” is presented as a newly discovered ideology and one which is free of religion and agenda. One that is more in line with my own feelings that there is energy in the universe that flows through us and that we can influence this energy through gratitude and positive thinking. The fact that it is in the Bible made me doubt all of the belief I had in gratitude and positive thinking. Had I been wasting my time in doing this and I had been foolish in promoting this to others?

However after talking to my husband and others and reflecting I began thinking about all the positives that have come from Christianity. Yes there have been many problems over the ages, however lots of good has been done. Even in the kind words and actions of people who genuinely use the bible teachings for good and help people. All the charitable foundations and good works of the church and those who acted for good. In the end I came to the conclusion that what I had learnt and been practicing in positivity and gratitude was right and it is actually in some form or another part of all religions. Practicing gratitude and positivity does  influence your life in a positive way. While this might not be in groundbreaking life changes or that it may not shield you from the challenges of life it has many benefits for health and wellbeing – particularly to help deal with negatively impactful situations and circumstances as well as guide you to more positive choices.

In fact it has reminded me that I haven’t been as grateful or a positive as I could have been of late. With a lot of work on and quite a few life and family challenges I have bene on more of a negative spiral the last few months. Husband on long term sick following a work accident, me needing to pick up more home tasks, son taken to hospital and diagnosed with diabetes, work overwhelming after taking on extra work, money worries and time taken off for stress. The negative situations all exacerbated by negative disposition and negative outlook and resolved through frustration depression, alcohol and overspending. I need to focus and think more positively about life again. So I’ll gloss over the trite and saccharin messages in Rhonda Byrnes “The Secret”  but embrace and believe in positivity, positive energy and gratitude. Turning her sugary interpretations into everyday actions and words which will at the very least give me a sense of peace and wellbeing.

So What have a read this month… from the Old Testament most of my reading this month has been Deuteronomy which apparently is also the last book of the Torah.

“Deuteronomy (“repetition of the Law”) serves as a reminder to God’s people about His covenant. The book is a “pause” before Joshua’s conquest begins and a reminder of what God required”

Ultimately this book is about Moses encouraging the children of the people who were lord in the wilderness – after having been cast out through sin – to come back to god. The book reinforces the 10 commandments as well as a range of laws and also some new laws such as

  • If a women and man are  adulterous they will be stoned to death
  • if a man sleeps with a virgin women in a town  and does she not scream for help they will be stoned to death.
  • If in the country and she is not betrothed he has to pay the father and marry the women

While many of these laws in the book seem oppressive and archaic from a modern perspective, in truth we don’t know if they were actually real laws. I find myself considering whether this actually happened or was written to bring a society into line. The fact is, that it is difficult to judge these laws properly from a modern perspective without context from the time. I was appalled to read a number of these but I came to realise that if I can’t have a clear observation of the situation, I can’t judge these laws as I don’t know and understand the society of 2000 years ago or more. However I can see how these laws being taught over the centuries have shaped societies and been the basis for more modern laws we know as well as cultural beliefs and values which has led to an over zealous enforcement of “laws” which  reality more modern societies have evolved beyond.

I also read Joshua, which is about how god give land to the people as was promised for their obedience to god, but effectively is the Israelites being given permission to take and destroy all the cities and people in the way with no mercy. Total destruction of the civilisations that exited in these places. This is where the Israelites cross the River Jordan and there is the battle at Jerico lead by Joshua after Moses death. Land is taken and then divided amongst the twelve tribes. The theological interpretation is suggested to be that this is a lesson to follow the word of god and be faithful and obedient. The literal interpretation is that it is ok for you to destroy to take what you think is yours under the banner of religion. I am not a scholar – I’d like to think that I’m reasonably well educated, reflective and well read, but my initial reaction to reading this was that the bible, and therefore God, condones the use of violence in the name religion. To me this helps explains subsequent historical as well as more recent atrocities linked to religion and religious beliefs. To me religion is being used as an excuse for people to exercise their true desire to dominate and destroy.

From the New Testament I have read Luke  which is essentially a detailed, orderly account of Jesus Christ’s life, ministry, death, and resurrection, as written by Luke to show Jesus as the Savior for all people. It is written to emphasises Jesus’ compassion for the marginalised, the poor, and highlighting the role of the Holy Spirit, prayer, and “upside-down” Kingdom values. A repetition from previous stories but aims to show how Jesus is fulfilling of the story of God.

I have progressed through more of Psalms and Proverbs which just seem to wash over me. I haven’t covered these very much so far so thought I’d add some detail. After some research I can see that I have been reading an introduction to the psalms 1-2 earlier in the year and it suggests that in the introduction this Is being offered as a new torah?!? I am already confused between Christianity and Judaism. Essentially this section I am on Psalm 3-41 is the foundation of covenant faithfulness a series of psalms about faithfulness to god – which to be honest I struggle to understand given the content of the old and new testament I am reading. I have also reading Proverbs

My final note from this month is the Bible says if a women is married to a man and he is unhappy with her he can say she is not a virgin and if there is no proof she is not a virgin she will be stoned to death (Deuteronomy 22:13-21)  which I think summarises the attitude of many towards women throughout history……..

#bible #bookReview #books #charlesDickens #christianity #faith #god #jesus #reading

A 200-Year-Old London Restaurant Gets a Glow-Up

Jeremy King Revitalizes a 200-Year-Old RestaurantCourtesy Simpson’s in the Strand Above: Jeremy King worked with his longtime designer, Shayne Brady of…
#dining #cooking #diet #food #Frenchrestaurants #CharlesDickens #francais #france #French #FrenchRestaurants #JeremyKing #Londonrestaurants #oscarwilde #Restaurants #Simpson'sintheStrand #winstonchurchill
https://www.diningandcooking.com/2562766/a-200-year-old-london-restaurant-gets-a-glow-up/

Romanen vars handling är förlagd till den fiktiva industristaden Coketown och kretsar kring den utilitaristiske filosofen/politikern Gradgrid och hans familj, kapitalisten Bounderby och några karaktärer ur de bredare folklagren (främst fabriksarbetaren Blackpool och den föräldralösa cirkusartisten Sissy) – innehåller en långtgående kritik av den tidiga industrikapitalismen.

https://blog.zaramis.se/2026/03/18/hard-times-av-charles-dickens/
Hard Times av Charles Dickens - Svenssons Nyheter

Hard Times av Charles Dickens. Romanen vars handling är förlagd till den fiktiva industristaden Coketown och kretsar kring den

Svenssons Nyheter
No one is useless in this world who lightens the burden of it to anyone else. ~ #CharlesDickens #quotes #humanity

It's been significant reading this week. Started the book a long time ago and had no real traction until this week when my youngest asked to go read together in the parents bed before lights out.

Reading #kristinlavransdatter over day and at night listening #CharlesDickens..

But just literature, no podcasts at all.

Lots of sleeping as well. The snow is almost melted.

Some deep cleaning today. I focused on the vacuum cleaners. Then papers/drawings of my youngest.

@sister_ratched

Quote

The Lord Protector of the Commonwealth of England, Oliver Cromwell, is not one of my favourite figures of history, but once gave one of my favourite pieces of advice to men convinced they had no alternative but to do something of which he did not approve. Writing to the General Assembly of the Kirk of Scotland, he said "I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be mistaken."

I use this as my text as I prepare to admit that I must walk back on some of the unkind words I have said about people whose conduct in the robodebt disaster was said to be corrupt, disgraceful and blameworthy. The behaviour of six was said by a royal commission to possibly amount to corruption under the national anti-corruption legislation.

Four of these initially unnamed people - including Scott Morrison, one-time social security minister and later prime minister, and Kathryn Campbell, former secretary of human services and later social security - were found after an inquiry by a Deputy NACC Commissioner, Kiley Kilgour, to deserve exoneration from this allegation. Two others were found to have acted corruptly, but they will not be charged because the commissioner does not believe that criminal charges could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. They are thus as free as the other four, apart from the stain on their reputations.

I was gobsmacked by the result because I had expected that there was ample material capable of supporting the allegations. Indeed, I was angry that the anti-corruption commissioners, minus the one who conducted the hearings, had initially shied from holding hearings at all, on the quite false grounds that all matters had been dealt with already by the royal commission. That decision was overturned, and the Chief Commissioner Paul Brereton was found to have committed a NACC corruption offence after he recused himself on the ground of acquaintanceship with Ms Campbell but subsequently sought to involve himself in deliberations about how cases were to be investigated.

At the time the NACC decision not to hold an inquiry was reversed, I urged that the NACC not be allowed to pick up on its mistake and visit again their initial predispositions on the matter. I said a new person should be chosen to do it, away from a commission which had already lost the confidence of the public. Kiley Kilgour, up to a point, fits that bill, and was assisted by former High Court justice Geoff Nettle. Kilgour comes from the Victorian broad-based commission against corruption, which operates secretively on NACC lines, and has a public profile and record like the NACC.
Fact finder extraordinarily naive in understanding of how govt works

We now have a 400-plus page "judgement" - the first from the NACC. Albeit after closed hearings so that no one could establish the zeal, if any, with which inquiries were pursued. Judging by the quotes in the judgment I doubt many witnesses were stretched.

I repent my rush to judgment, the more so because I now tend to agree with some of the commissioner's conclusions. At least based on the evidence that I now know. In general Ms Kilgour is more inclined to think the behaviour of the six (and another few dozen who appear equally blameworthy) was not dishonest and corrupt. Rather it was the product of a giant stuff-up in which the minds of various of the actors were not properly on their jobs. A complete stuff-up, not a provable conspiracy, in short.

So, should we treat the accused folk somewhat in the manner of folk acquitted of felony? Champagne all round after a horrible ordeal? Profuse apologies from people such as myself, and an entitlement by them to walk henceforth with heads held up high?

Not quite, because the source of doubts entertained by Ms Kilgour came mostly from the fact she was less than completely satisfied of corrupt purposes, even though there was evidence pointing to it. Her bar was very high.

But against such evidence were signs of incompetence, lack of attention to detail, a chain of correspondence and decision-making, stretching over years, that made following the evidence a bit confusing. And the stout denial of most of the parties that they ever had in mind the deception of the cabinet, the government, or the broader public. (Some of the denials were, by themselves, quite unconvincing, but that's a matter of impression.)

It was not straightforward. Sometimes (I suspect) deliberate ambiguity in thousands of emails and different motives on the part of some of the players complicated things. There was also a good deal of deliberate shorthand adverting, elliptically, to fears of senior officer retaliation. Some of the more junior public servants involved would go to almost any lengths to avoid conflict with them.

It is a judgment on even more senior public servants, including former secretaries of the prime minister's department and the Public Service Commission that such people were put up for leadership roles, and never brought to account, quite separately from the management of robodebt, for some of their tantrums, abuse and shocking misbehaviour.
Alleged bullying, tantrums, vindictive behaviour

Kathryn Campbell's unfortunate manner may have derived from her military "command and control" training and manner at the expense of the more woke inclusive style of most public service managers. (She was a major-general in the Army Reserve, like Paul Brereton.) I perfectly understand that running an army is about efficiently organising killing other people, not cuddling up to them. But I venture that no modern military leader as imperious, remote and unempathetic as Ms Campbell was alleged to be should ever be put in charge of soldiers. Anywhere.

One of the other management monsters was Malisa Golightly, a deputy secretary in Human Services, who had overall charge of the implementation of the robodebt project and was not much inclined to allow obstacles, including naysayers, to stand in the way of it. Nor to much respect the idea that public servants deserved some time off from time to time. Alas she died before the whole illegal and monstrous scheme fell apart. While she deserved her reputation as a bully, I have a cynical feeling that some of the blame has been foisted upon her.

The big problem standing in the way of the cock-up theory rather than conspiracy account is that there were guilty secrets influencing some players. The first was the consciousness that using taxation data to "average out" welfare income data was explicitly not authorised by the Social Security Act. This was pointed out firmly even before the robodebt scheme was put up before ministers for consideration by Kathryn Campbell. There was no way of getting around this: if the scheme was to work at all, such a system, which often produced unfair and false results, would have to be approved by legislation. Many thought they could deal with the problem by euphemism, lying about what occurred, or ignoring the nagging voices.

Ms Kilgour has accepted the assurances of Scott Morrison that he never indicated that he wanted the scheme to proceed without legislative changes, which, implicitly, might have (would have/should have) struck problems in the Senate. Be that as it may, no one in either of the departments ever put up legislation to their minister. Later, a false claim that legislation was not needed went before the cabinet expenditure review committee. Some of those who saw the documentation and should have noticed claim not to have done so. The royal commissioner said that Morrison, who had been told initially that the scheme contravened the law, was possibly corrupt for failing to notice this. It was certainly politically convenient for him.

1/2

Unquote


#AusPol #WhyTheFuckIsLabor #HahahahaLiebs #NatsAreNuts #VoteGreens #VoteProgIndies
#CircumlocutionOffice #CharlesDickens #LittleDorrit #Robodebt
@sister_ratched has already posted of this article, https://blahaj.zone/notes/ajsw2xq0c24v008v, & fwiw i'm about to post all da wordz, but first i felt an urge to mention that as i read thru Jack's essay i had an overwhelming sense of robodebt's abject absence of comeuppance as being entirely of a kind with Dickens' Little Dorrit's Circumlocution Office.

https://www.panarchy.org/dickens/circumlocution.html

😱😠

#auspol #CircumlocutionOffice #CharlesDickens #LittleDorrit #Robodebt
Jude🇵🇸 (@[email protected])

Jack nails it again: Freedom at last for the Robodebt Six, thanks to the NACC (paywalled). #AusPol https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9197389/jack-waterford-freedom-at-last-for-the-robodebt-six/

Blåhaj Zone