JOB: The Cleveland Museum of Art is reimagining ArtLens Gallery for 2026!
They are hiring an
Interactive Content Specialist
to bring the life stories of artworks to digital life—creation, conservation, repatriation & more.
Apply: https://recruiting.ultipro.com/CLE1004CMA/JobBoard/14a13635-e1f1-6802-5aba-82b151e8c57b/OpportunityDetail?opportunityId=d539ddd2-bc35-4f58-b509-6ab80485869b
#MuseumJobs #DigitalMuseums #ArtHistory #MuseumInnovation #InteractiveDesign #Interpretation #CMA #ArtLens
Sigma's 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN Art II is Lighter, Faster, and Sharper for $1,199

It has significant upgrades and costs half what Sony charges for a G-Master.

PetaPixel
Boudoir with Colette.
 #boudoir #boudoirphotography #monochrome #nikond780 @nikonusa @sigmaphoto #sigma50mmart #artlens

Petzval 55mm f/1.7 Review: A Lovely Lens For Pro or Creative Use

The $449 Petzval 55mm f/1.7 Mark II Bokeh Control Art Lens from Lomography is the first Petzval lens designed specifically for full-frame mirrorless camera systems like the Nikon Z, Canon RF, and Sony E. It's also fantastic.

Much like the Petzval 80.5mm f/1.9 lens I reviewed previously, the 55mm f/1.7 Mark II Lens was created with discerning photographers and filmmakers in mind and designed to allow full creative flexibility, with its seven levels of Bokeh Control and Dual Aperture system. According to the company, the 55mm lens features an improved design and a maximum aperture of f/1.7 that produces a "subtle, almost painterly” rendering when shooting at larger apertures.

After using the lens for a few weeks now, Lomography described the bokeh delivery of the lens quite accurately.

The lens is available in three different color options with the Brass and Black Aluminum options priced at $449 and the Black Brass priced at $499. Also just like the 80.5mm DSLR version, this mirrorless 55mm lens has the ability to control the amount of swirly bokeh effect in the images through an integrated Bokeh Control Ring which has seven settings, where level one is barely noticeable and level seven grants maximum bokeh.

Even though this is a new lens designed for the most recent camera systems on the market, it still holds on to its "steampunk" vibe that the Petzval lenses are known for, especially since the body of the lens is all-metal and the operation is entirely manual.

Build Quality and Design

While the two black versions of the 55mm Petzval lens look the same as any other lens, the brass version that I tested will definitely stand out and draw some eyes. The layout of the lens is similar to its 80.5mm sibling with its clickless focus, aperture, and bokeh intensity ring. All three controls shift smoothly and have enough tension in them to hold their zoons without having to worry about any drifting issues while shooting. That being said, when shooting with a system like this, it is always a good idea to double-check your settings before taking any important shots, just to be sure nothing got bumped or inadvertently adjusted.

Aesthetically, while the brass lens is rugged, it felt much easier to scratch and scuff than the black versions, and dust, hair, and smudges are very quick to appear if you are not diligent in keeping the lens body clean. When you have a lens as shiny as this one, you want to keep it sparkling clean to truly show it off and as a dog owner, I had to reach for my lens pens, air dusters, and microfiber cloths far more than usual -- a small price to pay in the grand scheme of things since the brass version of this lens really looks great.

Despite the great look of the 55mm Mark II lens, it lacks any true weather sealing or protection like the rest of the Petzval lens lineup. This lack of sealing and the drop-in bokeh pattern inserts it offers leads me to believe you should be extra cautious when using this lens outside in the "elements" just to be sure no water gets inside of it, and definitely make sure you have it insured.

The 55mm Mark II f/1.7 Bokeh Control lens has a built-in lens hood and a 67mm filter thread inside of it, making it quite difficult to get on, and off should you choose to use them. From conversations with other Petzval users, you can pretty much count on covering the filter in fingerprints while adding or removing them, so keep those microfiber cloths handy. I didn't have any need for the ND filters during my testing, but I can absolutely envision situations where an ND filter would come in handy shooting wide open with a lens like this.

Focus and Aperture

The lens has a dual aperture system with eight blades capable of a range of f/1.7 to f/22 with a secondary "waterhouse" plate aperture system for special bokeh effects that include a sun, snowflake, heart, star, and the default circle. While shooting at f/4 to f/22 (and the bokeh set to minium), the lens shot and behaved like any other manual 50mm lens on the market with just the smallest tell-tale signs of the swirly bokeh design on the very outer edges of the frame.

But while you can use it as though it is just like any other lens, why would you? This system is meant to be shot wide open to take advantage of the dreamy, painting-like swirls.

Shooting at f/3.5 or shallower, you start to see where this lens truly stands out, and unlike its 80.5mm sibling, the difference between the bokeh increments is much more noticeable. That includes a subtle "zoom" as you go deeper into the bokeh application.

I appreciate that the lens is capable of being used like a "normal" lens as well as providing some rather extreme bokeh effects though. As I said in the 80.5mm review, the fact it can be either adds value and usability to the lens since you are able to flip back into a "normal" lens should you be in the middle of a shoot and need to capture something a little sharper and less dramatic.

Also of note, thanks to the design of the optics, focusing is achievable from about two feet (0.6 meters) away, which lets you get a little closer to your subjects and creates some different perspectives.

As you might expect, when using the lens in its bokeh-rich modes, the "safe zone" for your subjects is pretty much dead center of the frame. Even if your camera shows you a focus peaking value that is in focus, if the subject is in the outer edges of the frame, the actual finishe dimage will be blurry or soft when you open it up on your computer. Be prepared to take lots of extra safety shots if you have never worked with a lens like this before, as there is going to be a pretty steep learning curve when it comes to controlling the bokeh.

Subject not centered equals blurry foreheads

Like the 80.5mm version, this lens equally threw my composition game for a loop. I will admit that there were a lot of deleted shots in the review process. Since I wanted to treat this like a vintage-style lens and get the most out of the bokeh I could, I shot at f/1.7 and dialed the bokeh dial all the way up to seven.

The Petzval lens forced me to throw the conventional training for composition completely out the window and start center focusing on everything I wanted to capture. You need to forget the "rule of thirds" and ensure your subject is dead center in the frame since the borders will be filled with swirl and bokeh. Once you let go of the rules, you will start to have an actual blast while working with this lens capturing everything from plant life to people in the street.

Image Quality

As mentioned above, if you do decide to shoot with this lens at f/4 or higher, it will return results similar to any other 50mm lenses at that aperture do with just minimal swirls on the very outer edges of the frame. Once you start to dial up the bokeh, you can see the swirl start to show up and become much more pronounced starting along the outer edge.

Minimal Bokeh at f/3.5 Maximum Bokeh at f/3.5

As long as you nail your focus, the image will be sharp. Much like its sibling, the colors from this lens come out of the camera a little bit on the cooler side than normal, but that is easily compensated for in post if you want to warm things back up. Check the images below to view the patterns you can get when using the different bokeh inserts at different intensities from the mid-range to the maximum.

Sun Max Sun Mid Star Max Star Mid Snowflake Max Snowflake Mid Heart Max Heart - Mid Normal - Mid Normal - Max

As you can see from the above examples, the difference between the bokeh levels in this lens is pretty extreme and personally I definitely love the look of photos taken at the extreme end. Just remember to always shoot with this lens focusing on the "center mass" in order to actually be in focus. If you do this, your shots will be swirly, dreamy, and full of incredible bokeh.

Sample Images

>

A Portrait Photographer's Secret Weapon

At $450, the Petzval 55mm f/1.7 MKII Brass lens isn't particularly expensive, and that price puts it somewhere around the middle to lower end of other "normal" 50 to 58mm lenses on the market. The price feels more than fair, even if the lens lacks autofocus.

For portrait and product photographers, this lens can be an amazing "secret weapon" to have tucked away in your gear bag. It's not the kind of lens you would necessarily use for an entire session, but it is one that will give you a few results to include with the rest of your set that will very likely delight portrait clients.

Are There Alternatives?

The Petzval lenses are a niche style with the only real rival for something else as unique and interesting as the Lomography lenses would be the Lensbaby lineup. While Lensbaby has some incredibly fun and interesting products, I don't believe they have anything that truly competes or compares to the Petzval bokeh patterns, nor this lens's flexibility or sharpness. Additionally, you could try finding some older 19th-century lenses from your local camera shops or auction sites. You may even get lucky and find some for incredibly cheap, however, you will still be left searching for a compatible adapter to use on modern mirrorless systems.

Should You Buy It?

Yes. Maybe it was the gorgeous brass design, maybe it was the fact it was easier to focus manually on my Nikon Z6 body than the 80.5mm Petzval, but either way, the Petzval 55mm f/1.7 MKII Brass Lens is useful in both professional and creative situations. The vintage-looking lens is a great conversation piece and just a ton of fun to shoot with on both sides of the camera. I actually enjoyed working with the 55mm f/1.7 MKII Petzval lens for mirrorless so much, after finishing the review I ended up ordering one for myself.

#equipment #reviews #55mm #art #artlens #bokeh #bokehcontrol #canon #lens #manual #manualfocus #mirrorless #nikon #petzval #review #vintage

Petzval 55mm f/1.7 Review: A Lovely Lens For Pro or Creative Use

A portrait photographer's secret weapon.

Leica 24-70mm f/2.8 Versus Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8: Is There a Difference?

While reviewing the Leica 24-70mm f/2.8, I was able to spend some time with a lens from Sigma that has been accused of being the exact same lens in a rehoused body. But is it?

_Editor 's note: The following evaluation is meant to be viewed after reading the full review of the Leica 24-70mm f/2.8, as most of the information below focuses on showing how the Sigma lens performs in comparison to those results and is written from the assumption that readers have familiarized themselves with the same assessment of the Leica lens.

Special thanks to LensRentals for providing the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN for the purposes of this comparison._

Side by side, the Leica Vario-Elmarit-SL 24-70mm f/2.8 ASPH lens is very similar to the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art Lens: the focus and zoom rings appear to be practically identical. The main visible differences lie in the shape and material of the lens hoods, the shape of the barrel near the lens mount, the presence of an AF/MF switch that is only found on the Sigma, and the solid metal material that is unique to the Leica.

As mentioned in the Leica 24-70mm review, when using the Leica lens on a Leica system, you can simply override the autofocus by adjusting the manual focus ring which arguably removes the need for the AF/MF toggle switch. Even if the optics are the same as both lenses, the Leica version does have a slight advantage in the durability department that comes from having a metal housing, but that makes it slightly heavier than the Sigma version as a result.

The Sigma lens weighs about 100 grams less than the Leica version, and while this isn't really a significant difference, it does at least seem noticeable when hand-holding the camera, since the system is just that much less front-heavy. As for the comfort and ergonomics, both feel very much the same. Sleek, responsive, smooth to the touch, with both versions of the lenses focus and zoom rings responding at nearly identical speeds.

Visually, it does feel like more of the "status symbol" when shooting with the Leica Vario-Elmarit-SL version mounted versus the more subtle Sigma lens. Even though the camera was always the Leica SL-2, the system as a whole felt less flashy when I used the Sigma Art lens. There is just something about seeing the yellow text on the side of the lens that stands out.

Before We Test…

To test these lenses, I used a Leica SL-2 and found that, effectively, the images from both of these lenses were incredibly similar to one other, but there were some noticeable performance differences when using the Sigma lens on the Leica SL-2 body that I will get to in a moment. It is also worth noting that for the purpose of this comparison, no lens-profile adjustments were made to the images shown in this post, so the corner behavior can be plainly seen from lens to lens. I also want to mention that in my testing, simply applying the lens profile for the Sigma lens in post-production makes the RAW images look nearly identical to one another.

Performance & Bokeh

As far as image quality, colors, and sharpness are concerned, both lenses perform incredibly well with nearly identical images coming out of each lens. Where they differ, however, is most noticeable while actually shooting. While the autofocus on the SL-2 is nowhere near as fast as the new generation of mirrorless systems From Nikon, Sony, or Canon, there is a significant performance difference between each of these lenses on a Leica camera.

For instance, if for example, an autofocus task were to take 0.5 to one second to lock on to an object with the Leica lens, the Sigma lens would take 1.5 to 2.5 seconds in the identical situation. This behavior was consistent regardless of the environment or lighting.

The images all came out sharp and clean in both cases, but the time to autofocus with the Sigma lens always took noticeably longer. On a Leica SL-2, this delay made using the Sigma version almost unusable when I attempted to shoot a moving subject wide open.

Sigma 24-70mm DG DN Art at 24mm and f/8 Leica Vario 24-70mm f/2.8 at 24mm and f/8

I also noticed that the camera was slower to boot up when I used the Sigma lens versus the Leica lens, which leads me to believe these issues are caused by firmware that could, theoretically, be adjusted by Leica in the future. Additionally, the Sigma lens does have very noticeable distortion and vignetting present (on the wide focal lengths) in the RAW files when compared to the same shots using the Leica lens. These issues are quickly and easily removed with the built-in lens profiles in editing applications like Capture One and Adobe Lightroom, but the issue definitely stands out when you compare the RAW files side by side.

Leica Vario 24mm at f/2.8 Sigma Art 24mm at f/2.8

While the bokeh patterns appear very similar between the Leica and Sigma lenses, what is also apparent is that there is a difference in the "bokeh zone" between these two lenses. Below is an example of a photo shot at the minimum focus distance at f/2.8 with both lenses with the (camera left) eye as the focal point. You may notice the Sigma lens is a little more front-focused.

Sigma 70mm at f/2.8 Leica 70mm at f/2.8

Beyond this short list of differences, as noted the lenses are otherwise quite similar.

Additional Sample Images

Leica 70mm at f/2.8 Sigma 70mm at f/2.8 Leica 70mm at f/8 Sigma 70mm at f/8 Leica 24mm at f/8 Sigma 24mm at f/8 Sigma 70mm at f/2.8 Leica 70mm at f/2.8 Leica 70mm at f/8 Sigma 70mm at f/8

Strengths and Weaknesses

Both of the lenses score well in the overall image quality department in my opinion. However, the Leica outperforms the Sigma lens significantly in autofocus speed on the Leica SL-2 system. This is probably not an issue that extends beyond Leica camera bodies, though. Even though both lenses have "slower" autofocus performance than other full-frame mirrorless systems on the market, if speed is important to you, then the Leica version is definitely the winner here if you plan to use it on a Leica camera.

If you use these lenses on an L-mount system other than Leica, the ability to quickly change the AF/MF mode using the button(s) on the Sigma lens is a definite advantage.

One thing is clear though: as much as the optical formula appears to be the same on both lenses, they certainly have some notable differences that make it difficult to label the Leica just a "rehoused" Sigma. While optically identical, there are other factors to consider.

Sigma Strengths

  • Slightly less weight
  • Costs significantly less money than the Leica lens
  • More subtle than the Leica lens for travel/street photography
  • AF/MF, Lock, and programmable button available on the Sigma lens

Leica Strengths

  • Leica's metal lens looks and feels better than the Sigma plastic version
  • "Lens Profile" seems to be applied automatically with the Leica system
  • Looks and feels more professional than Sigma version
  • Works better on Leica cameras

The Same, But Different

Over the course of testing these lenses, other than the physical differences (since we can compensate for the vignetting in post quickly), the only real variations between these lenses seem to be the prices and the autofocus speed performance on Leica cameras. Another big difference is the price: the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art Lens for Leica L is available for just $1,099 while the Leica Vario-Elmarit-SL 24-70 f/2.8 ASPH Lens is $2,795. If you're shooting on Leica, that might be worth it for superior autofocus speed. Everyone else will find very few reasons to select the Leica over the Sigma, especially when the latter is available for almost three times less.

The Verdict

While the Sigma lens may have a few additional features with the AF/MF switch and button, the lenses have basically the same performance. Optically speaking, the images are nearly identical with only very subtle differences when shot at the lens's respective focal and aperture extremes, so you won't be making a bad choice either way. In the end, you'll just have to make your decisions based on personal preference, the intended use of the lens, and how much you want to spend.

#comparisons #equipment #reviews #2470mm #artlens #comparison #lmount #leica #leicavario #leicavssigma #lenscomparison #review #sigma #sigma2470mmf28dgdnart #sigmavsleica

Leica 24-70mm f/2.8 Versus Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8: Is There a Difference?

Is the Leica really just a rehoused Sigma?