A real character is Callum. Undaunted.

"A great reminder that in antenna building, the weak point isn’t always where you expect — and sometimes failure is the best teacher."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQvp3yK-lm8

#HamRadio #antennas #StructuralEngineering #rope

I was not expecting this new throw line cube to be so tricky to unfold. I take this as confirmation I need to work on my line skills. ⬛

#ThrowLine #Throwing #AmateurRadio #HamRadio #Meshcore #portable #antennas

Isn’t every quarter-wave antenna really a half-wave antenna?

It’s a bit early for April Fool’s jokes so this is a perfectly serious discussion. Just maybe, the distinction between a quarter-wave and a half-wave antenna is a bit more obscure than we thought. Which is better; a quarter-wave or a half-wave antenna? Does it even matter if indeed every quarter-wave antenna really is a half-wave antenna? The answer is not straightforward and we will explore why in this week’s post.

Let’s all use our noddles

An expert could be defined as somebody who knows at least a little more about a subject than most other people. I am not an expert, but I do have a very inquiring mind. Don’t accept anything you read here without question. Science is the process of submitting a hypothesis which can be challenged, refuted, updated or even discarded. New hypotheses can replace old ones as further studies are completed. Treat everything you read here as a hypothesis; it might be completely wrong, partially right or even brilliantly correct. Challenge it with your own critical thought because I thought I was wrong once – but I was mistaken 😉

How to improve the efficiency of an antenna by burying half of it in the ground

Sounds ridiculous doesn’t it? But isn’t that exactly what we do when we erect a ground-mounted quarter-wave whip with a set of radials? What role do the radials play? Do they reflect the signal away from the ground? “Experts” say no, so my hypothesis suggests that an efficient set of radials establishes a ground plane that is better (or worse) than the actual ground itself.

The Good Earth

The problem with “the good Earth” is that it isn’t always. It depends on the conductivity of whatever our antenna is mounted on. Seawater could be considered the best ground plane but it has an unfortunate habit of being a slightly unreliable support for antennas. Moving inland a little we have sand, nice firm sand. The sea is still close by and helps with antenna efficiency and directionality, that is if you wish to send your signal in the direction of where the sea is.

Unfortunately for me, the closest sea (James Bay in the near Arctic) is over a thousand kilometers to the north and is frozen for much of the year. So I have to rely on the conductivity of the soil in my area. I live in the Great Lakes region and I am surrounded on three sides by the waters of mighty Lake Huron. Pure freshwater is almost a perfect insulator, but I have the advantage of living on the Niagara Escarpment and water from my well contains over 2000 parts per million of dissolved solids. That may improve my soil conductivity for ham radio purposes but it cost me a small fortune in water treatment equipment to get rid of those dissolved solids to make the water drinkable.

Whenever I wish to deploy a ground-mounted antenna I have to rely on ground radials because sometimes my portable operations take me to locations where I set up on the ancient bedrock of the Canadian Shield, or sandy lakeside beaches where the ground conductivity is not so good.

How do ground radials really work?

I hypothesized earlier that radials establish a ground plane. Their purpose is to give the antenna – and it’s image in the ground – a zero reference point. If this ground plane is efficient (i.e. lots of radials) the current in both the ground and the antenna will increase. Higher current in the antenna means more signal is radiated. And what about that higher current in the ground? The earthworms will thank you for the extra warmth.

By the way, counterpoise or radials?

The two terms are often confused. When I use the term “counterpoise” I use it to mean “the other half of the antenna” which may be made up of a set of radial wires, or a blanket of Faraday cloth, or AA1AR, Bruce’s copper mesh.

What’s to be done?

If half our signal is warming the winter nightcrawlers what can we do to redirect the crown joules in a more useful direction? First, let’s examine the current distribution in a half-wave antenna wire.

Let’s call it a “voltage-fed” antenna because a lot of half-wave antennas are end-fed. It could equally be a center-fed dipole which is also a half wavelength long. There are several different ways to erect an End-Fed Half-Wave antenna:

• Vertical
• Flat top
• Inverted-V
• Inverted-L
• Sloper

Notice that however we erect it, the entire antenna remains above ground. Some online advice suggests the ends of the wire can be placed close to the ground because there is almost no current there. Others disagree and note that the ends of a half-wave wire are high voltage points and should be kept above head height. And it isn’t just for safety reasons. What are the effects of placing a high voltage point close to ground? Could there be some ground interaction that affects the antenna performance. Any experts care to comment?

Enter the Dipole

A dipole or an EFHW can be erected vertically. Let’s talk about the dipole. It is a center-fed half-wave (a CFHW if you like acronyms). A vertical dipole could be described as a quarter-wave vertical antenna with a quarter-wave counterpoise. Can’t see it? Suppose the counterpoise section is tilted away from vertical. Now it looks more like quarter-wave with a counterpoise. But, the whole antenna is still a half-wave, isn’t it?

Bifurcate that counterpoise

A bifurcated counterpoise is a fancy way of saying split it in two, or in other words, duplicate it. Why? Well again, this is my personal theory. The lower half of a vertical dipole may come close to ground unless it is raised high enough. Ground effects may distort the radiation pattern. If we add an extra wire to the counterpoise section the antenna looks like an Inverted-Y and the current in the counterpoise is split between two conductors. If the current in each conductor is half that of a single conductor the resistive loss in the counterpoise section will be lower, and any ground interaction may be mitigated.

I have occasionally used an Inverted-Y for many years. It was one of the earliest antennas I ever built and performs well. An Inverted-Y built for 20m has to be erected at a height of at least 30 feet (~10m). At that height the feedpoint sits about 13ft above ground and the two radials must be spread at quite a wide angle to remain clear of the ground. I wonder whether we could make this antenna more stealthy? A 30ft mast in a busy public place tempts unwelcome attention from passers-by and park officials. Some ideas rattling around in my old, grey noddle are:

• Lower the apex by shortening the radiating element with a low-loss capacitance hat at the apex
• Reduce the length of the radiating element AND the radial wires using linear loading (folding the wires back on themselves with a small spacing)

Any other ideas from readers would be most welcome. Let me know what you think in the comments.

Help support HamRadioOutsidetheBox

No “tip-jar”, “buy me a coffee”, Patreon, or Amazon links here. I enjoy my hobby and I enjoy writing about it. If you would like to support this blog please follow/subscribe using the link at the bottom of my home page, or like, comment (links at the bottom of each post), repost or share links to my posts on social media. If you would like to email me directly you will find my email address on my QRZ.com page. Thank you!

The following copyright notice applies to all content on this blog.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

I've update my antenna tripod to a 4.8m version from Rollei. ufb! unfortunately this kind of light stand doesn't offer adjustable legs for uneven terrains. So I made this two little helper. Files can be found on Printables.com:

https://www.printables.com/model/1645522-bulls-eye-level-for-rollei-light-stand-tripod

https://www.printables.com/model/1645334-adjustable-leg-adapter-for-rollei-light-stand-trip

#hamradio #antennas #pota #amateurfunk

Right after birth, the still blind ‘horn kitten’ seeks out a place to hide, typically a horn antenna.
The antenna and cat forms a symbiosis, and grow together, until finally, around age 2, a fully grown cat and an L-Band horn settles a life long relationship.

Occasionally two kittens settles in the same horn, forming a ‘Vivaldi pair’ and they’ll stay together like that for the remainder of their life.

This picture is extremely rare - as David Attenborough was once quoted, “It’s absolutely astounding”

#antennas #kitty #rfengineering

A short and maybe not-so-sweet HF antenna

A lot of information has been posted online recently about very short portable vertical antennas. There must be some magic in how they work, surely, since they appear to disobey the laws of physics. I used to own one called a “Miracle Antenna”; it was manufactured in Quebec, Canada. It comprised a 57-inch telescoping whip mounted on a remarkably well-engineered toroidal loading coil with many taps selectable by means of a rotary switch. The Miracle Antenna could be used from 80m up to 70cm with a suitable counterpoise. The loading coil switch had a bypass position so that the antenna could be used as an unloaded whip for VHF/UHF. The 57-inch (~1.5m) whip is a three-quarter wavelength on 2m; 70cm could be selected by shortening the whip.

I made lots of contacts!

I was thoroughly impressed by my Miracle Whip; I made lots of contacts with it. Really; it worked remarkably well – but only on VHF. Perhaps if I had tried harder with it I could have snagged some QSOs on HF too, but that never happened. It was relegated to the role of a great 2m band antenna used for accessing my local repeater.

So what’s up with very short antennas?

First, let me dispel one myth about them. With a suitable transmatch (tuner) or adjustable loading coil, a nice low SWR can be obtained even from the shortest of shorties. Let’s say you can tune for 1:1 SWR on multiple bands. Great! Now key up and start working the pile-ups! Yes? Or no?

Whoa … Not so fast pilgrim!

The SWR that the radio sees results from a private negotiation between the transmatch and the radio; the antenna doesn’t enter into it. Compare it to a wild west cowboy town. The local sheriff maintains law and order inside the town, but outside the town it’s still the untamed wild west.

The SWR at the feedpoint of a very short vertical antenna (excluding loading coil) is very high. That high SWR is presented to the “tuner” as a high impedance that the “tuner” transforms to 50 ohms resistive, or close to that value. That “varmint” of a shortie antenna remains a wild, untamed, high SWR beastie. Why is that?

There is another factor to consider and it is critically important. It’s called Radiation Resistance (Rrad). Rrad is a strange animal in that a high Rrad results in higher efficiency of the antenna. Very short antennas have a very low Rrad. I set up a 57-inch whip on a tripod and attached a 17ft counterpoise, them measured the Resistance and Reactance on the 20m band. The numbers I obtained were 1.98 – j53 ohms. The reactance value (X = -j53) was actually a lot better than I expected and I have a theory about why that is. I will explain later in this post.

Now let’s look at how antenna efficiency is calculated. An antenna has two types of resistance; Radiation Resistance (which is good) and Loss Resistance (Rloss which is bad, very, very bad). Loss resistance includes every connection between components in the antenna system, ohmic loss in any loading coils as well as ground loss in the counterpoise system. Efficiency is the ratio between Radiation Resistance and total resistance:

Efficiency = Rrad/(Rrad+Rloss)

Lets assume the Rrad value is equal to the real component of the antenna’s impedance; in the example given above that’s 1.98 (let’s call it 2) ohms. Determining the value of the total loss resistance is not easy. There will be a few ohms of resistance in all the connection points and definitely in the loading coil – especially for a base-loaded vertical since the current is at a maximum at the antenna feedpoint. But the biggest losses may come in the ground system.

Typically, from accounts I have read, operators often lay just a single counterpoise wire on the ground. The current in this wire will be the same as the current in the radiating element and will be almost totally lost in the ground.

Now, let’s look at how my experimental shortie vertical antenna would perform if I took it out to the field. And, also, let’s assume I used a base loading coil to resonate it instead of a tuner. If I adjusted the coil to give a 1:1 SWR guess what? That would be VERY BAD, VERY VERY BAD. Here is why:

We can insert the value I measured for Rrad into the efficiency formula given above:

Efficiency = Rrad/(Rrad+Rloss) – inserting measured value of Rrad: Efficiency = 2/(2+Rlos).

Since we have also measured an SWR of 1:1 the feedpoint impedance is 50 ohms (resistive) comprising the total of Rrad + Rloss.

Now we can deduce the value of Rloss as the difference between the 50 ohm resistive impedance at the feedpoint minus Rrad. Rloss = 50 – 2 = 48 ohms.

So the efficiency of our shortie antenna can be calculated as 2/50 = 4%.

Gadzooks!!!

If little shortie is used with a QRP radio putting out 5 watts into the antenna, the actual radiated power will be only 4% of 5 watts = 200 milliwatts. That’s sad.

Hey Jude, don’t make it bad

“Take a sad antenna and make it better”. There are two ways to make an antenna better. We can increase its radiation resistance or reduce its loss resistance. The first way is very easy; the second is more difficult. To increase its radiation resistance all we have to do is make it longer. We know that a half wave antenna has an endpoint impedance that is resistive and very high – typically 2000 ohms or more. If we plug that into the equation we get an efficiency of 2000/2000+48 = 98%.

“What a load of horse feathers, I still make plenty of contacts with my short vertical”

Yes, of course your 200 milliwatts will still be heard and you will still make contacts. Let’s introduce another bit of physics to explain why. It’s called the Inverse Square Law. It states that the strength of your signal is proportional to the square of the distance between the transmitting station and the receiving station. Modern HF receivers are very sensitive and can receive signals down into the microvolt range. If the receiving station has “big ears”, i.e. a big efficient antenna, it has a better chance of picking up very weak signals and will hear your 200mW signal. But at a certain distance the Inverse Square Law dictates that the strength of your signal will have fallen below the threshold at which even Big Ears can detect you. But, the Inverse Square Law applied to stations closer to you means your 200mW will still be heard.

If the DX can hear you, can he still work you?

Now let’s look at another situation in which Big Ears can hear you fine business and replies to your call. Now yet another bit of physics comes into play – it’s called the Reciprocity Principle. Simply put it states that an antenna’s transmit efficiency is the same as its receive efficiency. So Big Ears is calling you but you may not be able to hear him.

There’s no free lunch

There are lots of shortie antennas available. If you choose to build, or buy one you will have to accept that, while you may have fun with it, it has limitations. When propagation is good you may even get some pleasant surprises.

Oh, I see, that’s why …

Finally, I wrote earlier in this post that I was surprised at the relatively low capacitive reactance of the shortie antenna I put up for testing. I think I can explain why. At my home QTH in southern Ontario, Canada, winter hasn’t finished its dastardly doings yet. It was way too cold and windy outside to venture out onto the planet’s surface for antenna experiments, so I set up my 57-inch whip on a tripod inside the house and laid 17 feet of wire across the floor as a counterpoise. It is possible that this appeared as an ungrounded Off Center Fed antenna to my RigExpert antenna analyzer. The total length was just under 22 feet which is about 2/3 of a half wavelength on 20m. The analyzer might then have perceived this as a less inefficient antenna than a short vertical (0.075 wavelengths on 20m) worked against an electrical ground.

Help support HamRadioOutsidetheBox

No “tip-jar”, “buy me a coffee”, Patreon, or Amazon links here. I enjoy my hobby and I enjoy writing about it. If you would like to support this blog please follow/subscribe using the link at the bottom of my home page, or like, comment (links at the bottom of each post), repost or share links to my posts on social media. If you would like to email me directly you will find my email address on my QRZ.com page. Thank you!

The following copyright notice applies to all content on this blog.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

I’ve skated on my one arborist bag throwing lesson from @beckett long enough.

I think I’m going to have to break down and watch some youtoob videos on technique. My willow oak humbled me today 😅

Recommendations, Mastodon.radio?

#NewHam #NewHams #Throwing #Antennas #Portable #pota #AmateurRadio #hamradio