So ist es bei mir wenn ich surfe: "Schalte den #Adblocker aus, damit du die Seite betrachten kannst." Ich: Goodbye. 😂

Bildquelle: #System32Comics

#notracking #unplugbigtech #unplugbigdata #marketing #seo #usertracking #onlinemarketing #bigdata #cookies #nocookies #dsgvo #adblock #ublock #ublockOrigin #origin #peehole #adblockplus #adaway #tracking

EasyList is planning to remove a large number of adservers at or around 6 AM European time Monday next week.

There have been concerns raised about if MV3 extensions can handle removing this many filters: https://github.com/w3c/webextensions/issues/319#issuecomment-4094568592

Both AdGuard and uBlock Origin have confirmed this should not be a problem for their extensions, as they bundle the rules with the extension rather than loading them dynamically.
The AdBlock Plus developers have requested EasyList remove the filters in chunks, due to concerns about issues.

#MV3 #AdBlockPlus #uBlockOrigin #AdGuard

Increase the maximum number of dynamic rules to 30,000 · Issue #319 · w3c/webextensions

In the case of ad blockers, dynamic rules can serve several purposes: Differential updates for the static rulesets. Allowing users to add custom filter lists which are not included into the extensi...

GitHub
Hey #AdblockPlus, is this an "acceptable", or "nonintrusive" advert?
In an installed PWA app, covering scrolling content.

@cgudrian

#YouTube #AdblockPlus

Nimm halt einen anderen AdBlock - es sollte genug Auswahl geben.

WTF? #YouTube deaktiviert jetzt eigenmächtig #AdblockPlus?!?

youtube.com wird jetzt automatisch der Allow-List hinzugefügt. Das ist einigermaßen kacke.

#Cromite bendición 🙏
Ya con esto, no necesitas nada más (quizá el #AdBlockPlus integrado, por eso de los scripts, pero redunda un poco ya que uso #DNSOverTLS privado de bonito.cafe)

Que si #firefox tiene extensiones? Sí, pero sólo pocas para la versión movil

#YaDuermanALaZorra

有人测试,开了adblockplus Pro还会显示他自己网站的cookie banner吗 

#cookie #adblockplus #adblock

I almost forgot an upcoming anniversary. 20 years ago I wrote this comment complaining about the state of the AdBlock extension: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315754#c12. I’m trying to reconstruct from my emails what happened later (I didn’t archive IRC discussions unfortunately).

While the AdBlock devs claimed that everything was fine, on 2005-11-29 Mozilla was contacting everyone listed as an AdBlock contributor (myself included), trying to find someone who could update it for the Firefox 1.5 release. Mozilla already made the necessary adjustments on addons.mozilla.org but back then update manifests were self-hosted, and somebody had to modify the file on the AdBlock website. The only person with the necessary access was rue, the project maintainer at the time, everybody else could only stand by helplessly.

At some point over the next two weeks I convinced rue to let me improve code quality of AdBlock, with improved maintainability as one of the goals. I’m not sure when I started this work which turned into a complete rewrite (yes, the codebase was that bad) but on 2005-12-16 I was looking for people to help me test it, saying that the extension would be ready by tomorrow. It actually took one day longer, on 2005-12-18 I posted an almost finished version in a Russian-language web developers forum: https://web.archive.org/web/20061011145831/http://xpoint.ru/forums/programming/XUL/thread/34705.xhtml

That’s when rue got cold feet, they considered the changes too extensive. Things went quickly downhill from there, and I think one of the closing comments from them went along the lines of “developing a browser extension for millions of users takes more than a big mouth.” I don’t think AdBlock ever had millions of users.

On 2005-12-19 I was already trying to see where Mozilla stands on yet another AdBlock fork being published (a fork called Adblock Plus already existed, though it wasn’t listed on addons.mozilla.org). On 2005-12-21 I contacted the developers of Adblock Plus, asking them whether they would allow me to use the name of their project so that there aren’t two competing AdBlock forks around.

By 2006-01-10 I was done rewriting the rest of the code, and an allowlist functionality was added as well (originally I was prohibited from adding this feature, it being planned for AdBlock 0.6 which never got released). This is the changelog which I was sharing at that point: https://palant.info/temp/ABP_changelog.txt

On 2006-01-13 I got a permission from Adblock Plus devs to publish my code as Adblock Plus 0.6, sort of as an update to their project. At the same time rue seemed to have a change of heart once again, saying that I would be allowed to publish my rewrite as AdBlock 0.7. I didn’t quite trust this arrangement (rightfully so), so on 2006-01-14 I submitted an application for an Adblock Plus project page on mozdev.org.

Adblock Plus 0.6 has finally been published on 2006-01-17. The rest is history…

#Adblock #AdblockPlus #history #Mozilla #extensions

315754 - Adblock 0.5.2.039 is buggy and needs update on a.m.o

RESOLVED (Bugzilla-alanjstrBugs) in addons.mozilla.org Graveyard - Public Pages. Last updated 2016-02-04.

🛑 Oh hello there, AdBlockPlus 🛑

So you've just opened another tab in my browser & switched focus to that - to once again advertise to me... that you've blocked however many ads?

F*ck off.

I am going to replace you with a raspberry pi in short order

#adblockplus #pihole