Yellow Flag

@WPalant@infosec.exchange
3.3K Followers
41 Following
5.5K Posts

Wladimir Palant, software developer and security researcher, browser extensions expert. / searchable

#infosec #cybersecurty #cryptography #privacy

Websitehttps://palant.info/
PronounsHe/him

Software is political. Open source is completely irrelevant if we allow Nazis, misogynists, abusers, racists, and ableists to thrive while people who believe in human rights and accessibility are made to feel unwelcome and unsafe.

Refusing to use commercial software does not make you a good person.

here is a non-exhaustive list of people who have been defended in open source communities:
– serial rapists. Yes, that's a plural.
– people convicted of possessing child abuse materials.
– people defending lower ages of consent
– a guy with a massive Nazi swastika tattoo on his chest.
– people who have made blatantly dehumanizing statements about people with disabilities.
– people who have made blatantly racist statements in public
– People who are the system administrators for far right terrorist groups.
– people who have doxxed and swatted women for existing in public, developing free video games, or documenting hatred of Black women online

for every one of these cartoonishly evil people, there is an army of "both sides" defenders who oppose the existence of a code of conduct of any kind. For every one of these cartoonishly evil people, there are men (and a fair number of white women) who defended them and kept their jobs in positions in open source communities, while everyone who spoke up for human rights was ostracized.

I don't care about your open-source license unless you get your attitude towards human beings in order.

I do not know where you live but chances are that you are currently living through the famous Martin Niemöller poem. I hope you are familiar with it: https://hmd.org.uk/resource/first-they-came-by-pastor-martin-niemoller/. No, this isn’t just about the USA, similar stuff is going on everywhere I look.

To be clear: resistance is not the job of minorities and other groups who are at the top of the Nazis’ target list. They will resist of course, because what else can they do? But without support from the general population they will ultimately fail.

So if you belong to a privileged group (typically that’s something like white, cis, male, native to your country) then you should be looking at how you can leverage your privilege to protect those less fortunate than you.

You can generally look at the newspapers to see who the favorite scapegoat today is. Foreigners? Muslims? Jews? Black people? Trans people? Poor people? Disabled people? They all have the same rights as you do. None of them should be made a scapegoat for your society’s problems. Yes, even if a few people in this group misbehave – it’s human nature that every group of people always has the entire range: good, bad, and everything in between.

So if you are in a position of privilege and you choose to do nothing then I am totally judging you. And I don’t care about your reasons. Whatever the risk is for you, for other people that risk is a lot higher. And they cannot even choose to ignore the situation that is unfolding. You don’t have to change the world, but there is always something you can do.

I’ve already received a “shame on you” for that stance today. Well, I can live with that. Can you live with your choices?

Holocaust Memorial Day Trust | First They Came – by Pastor Martin Niemöller

First They Came is a poem by Pastor Martin Niemoller

Holocaust Memorial Day Trust

I’m going to say this slowly.

If Andrew Tate & his ilk were right about ANYTHING they’d have no audience.

Guys would listen briefly, apply advice, & be WAY too busy with their new gfs, side-pieces, & high income hustles to bother tuning in.

It’s the Tinder principle: if you’re happy, they lose a customer.

Their business model is your unending misery.

I grew up steeped in the "I would die for my country" or "I would die for my children" or "He died for our sins" where death was the ultimate showing of love...

...I have to sit with that.

But what I want to know is... Would you live for your country? Would you build for your children (and their children)? Would you help out your neighbor even if they don't follow your god?

Would you fix. Would you love. Would you grow, heal, and cherish for those around you?

Death is easy. Life is hard.

The greatest showing of love is to live and to help others live and to increase that quality of life.

The sexiest thing a man can do is to reject right-wing manosphere redpill ideology in favor of empathy, kindness, and moral goodness.
Apparently all kids now need to know "AI". It was not long ago that all kids needed to know how to code.

I believe this: all kids need to know they are loved.

That is both a challenge to achieve that we can work on, and makes actual sense. And will have way more impact than a tech fantasy.

The cruelty is the point.

The whole purpose of the news cycle appears to be instilling fear, uncertainty, and confusion. Leaving people dumbstruck until the next thing hits. Endlessly.

But I do not want to allow others to control my attention.
I do not want to succumb to fear and concern.
I do not want to react.
I want to act.

I want to believe in a better future.
I want to support and care.
I want to learn and rejoice.
I will resist.

And so it's important, when Chris Krebs is being attacked from what's been called "the bully pulpit," that we advocate for Mr. Krebs, but not because we like him or think he's a fine fellow, or even because he's under attack. (Although those are reasonable reasons to come to his defense.)

We advocate for Mr. Krebs because he did his job professionally, took in the available facts, and made a judgement call. Any penalty for that call should be carefully adjudicated.

There's no evidence that he made that call in violation of professional norms. There's no evidence he was wrong. There are plenty of people (such as the aforementioned Ellis and Giuliani) who have cause to dig for such evidence. But none exists.

If this logical chain holds, then this isn't a political question. It's a question of: do you want to be able to call yourself a professional?

I do, and I stand with Mr. Krebs.

(5/5)

Companies are refusing to hire or even laying off plumbers because hucksters backed by massive unicorn-chasing investment money told them they can build plumbing faster and cheaper out of cardboard.

A few years from now, there’s going to be a hell of a market for people who can replace cardboard toilets with real ones.

And also for people who can replace carpets. And walls and floors.

This is a post about LLM-generated code.

By the way, I still think this paragraph I wrote is a pretty good paragraph.