Teenager in court for ‘Googly eyes on public-space sculpture known as ‘Blue Blob’.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1wl5jp94eno.amp
I hope she manages to find a lawyer who is familiar with ‘Art restoration’ damages.
My first thoughts here was ‘What due diligence did the contracted restorers and council do to ensure that the googly eyes would be safely removed?’
‘Did they attempt to contact the alleged offender to ask what type of adhesive was used?’
‘What research did they do to determine the safest method of removing the item?’
If there was no due diligence, why should the Teenager be held responsible for the damages caused by the failures of the contracted Restorer?
Lastly, if she is found responsible for some or all of the damages, I hope the sentence is in the form of community service - like cleaning graffiti.
#SALaw