Mastodawn

Show thread

Gabriel Heinrichs Feb 12

@lakens Perhaps peer review should start including #attorney1 in addition to #reviewer2

But seriously, curious to read whether Nelson discussed anti-SLAPP regulations that are currently in the making, AFAIK.

Show thread

Piia Bartos Feb 9

I have failed as #Reviewer2 and let the manuscript go with minor corrections.

Piia Bartos Feb 9

Next manuscript to review. I do what I must.

#AcademicChatter #Reviewer2 #Reviewer2isMe #reviewer2mustbestopped

RSS News Feed Feb 3

bsky.app:

#Academia #Reviewer2 [contains quote post or other embedded content]

🔗 Ver original

Dr Keith Wilson 💭 (@keithwilson.eu)

#Academia #Reviewer2 [contains quote post or other embedded content]

Bluesky Social

Dr Keith Wilson 💭Feb 3

#Academia #Reviewer2

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:tbuqmt45vauue7msmqcth2ay/post/3mdyg4c4ga22j

Laurent Duval Jan 29

RE: https://mastodon.social/@GRETSI_info/115977902557648123

Je fais mon #reviewer2 : belle initiative d'afficher 72 noms de femmes scientifiques, et je déplore une absence dans cette liste : la marquise du Châtelet, femme de lettres, mathématicienne et physicienne française, figure du Siècle des Lumières. Émilie Du Châtelet, un passeur scientifique au XVIIIe siècle
: https://journals.openedition.org/histoire-cnrs/7752

Madame Pres commandasaurus 🦖Dec 9

I get the most petty satisfaction at using papers I disagree with as literal fuel for the fire in my wood stove.

#Vermont #Reviewer2

Show thread

Tom Stoneham Dec 5

@the_roamer @jschauma
I was really disappointed by this article. It isn't exactly news since this has been happening globally for over a year now. And the analysis was superficial, not looking at wider economic and political factors making the ideal of the university challenging to sustain in a totally f**ked world. Whole thing stank of American exceptionalism and needed a bit of basic research outside the author's personal experience. So speaks #Reviewer2

petersuber Oct 26

"More than 20% of chemistry researchers have deliberately added information they believe to be incorrect into their manuscripts during the peer review process, in order to get their papers published."
https://cen.acs.org/policy/publishing/One-five-chemists-deliberately-added/103/web/2025/10

* Primary source
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08989621.2025.2564106
(#paywalled)

#AddedValue #Chemistry #PeerReview #Reviewer2 #ScholComm