@heidilifeldman

Thanks, Professor. I was going to ask you if there was a similar article on the #14thAmendmentSectionThree but written post Trump v. Anderson, but have already found one - also by Baude & Paulsen - written post Anderson and forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review. "Sweeping Section Three under the Rug: A Comment on Trump v. Anderson" is available here:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4952397

A boost from you would be helpful if you think it appropriate.

#USPol #USPolitics #14thNow #RIPJimmy

Sweeping Section Three under the Rug: A Comment on Trump v. Anderson

<p><span>In Trump v. Anderson, the Supreme Court was confronted with the explosive question of whether former President Donald Trump was constitutionally disqua

@yuhasz01

As I noted originally, there *is* a growing body of legal opinion that views the now #PresidentElect to be Constitutionally #disqualified from holding office. As might be expected, this body of opinion is now being added to: some of the opinion is as current as today where, in a YouTube discussion with Brian Tyler Cohen, former federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner re-states his view that #Trump has been adjudicated as an insurrectionist by: i) the state of Colorado; ii) #Congress (in the second #impeachment trial); iii) the #Jan6 Committee (1). #Insurrection – & not treason – is the relevant yardstick for #14thAmendmentSectionThree

Cohen & Kirschner also discuss a Dec 26 article by Evan A. Davis & David M. Schulte (“Congress has the Power to Stop Trump from Taking Office…”) where legal scholars Davis & Schulte argue that despite the implications of Trump v. Anderson (the Colorado case in #SCOTUS), Trump is still disqualified due to legal precedent & his Electoral College votes may be objected to in Congress on that basis under the Electoral Count Act (2).

I further note that there are other mechanisms available for Congress to ‘trigger’ disqualification (or to “remove such disability”) under #AmendmentXIV (see Kaitlyn Bird, “King Trump is not Inevitable” (3), Jessica Denson’s YouTube channel (4) & bibliography of legal opinion (5)): mechanisms that also fall within SCOTUS’ determination in Trump v. Anderson.

I’m not a US citizen but I care about the country (to the point that I wrote a book about it) & this is my reading of the up-to-date (as of today) legal thinking on the left. I still think that you have an ‘out’: but that this ‘out’ is going to expire on #InaugurationDay After that, all bets are off.

(1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XI5-s6NIcys
(2) https://thehill.com/opinion/congress-blog/5055171-constitution-insurrection-trump-disqualification/
(3) https://www.damemagazine.com/2024/12/03/king-trump-is-not-inevitable/
(4) https://www.youtube.com/@JessicaDenson07/videos
(5) https://nowmarch.org/legal-authority/

#USPol #USPolitics #DonaldJTrump #RuleOfLaw #14thNow #RIPJimmy

Prosecutor on whether Congress can BLOCK Trump's certification

YouTube
Thank you @desertbus! Enjoy your burgers! #burgersquad #ripjimmy #db2023 #dbfh2023
A Pirate Looks At Forty

YouTube

🎶
Yes, I am a pirate
two hundred years too late
The cannons don't thunder
there's nothin' to plunder
I'm an over-forty victim of fate
Arriving too late, arriving too late

#ProcrastinateASong
#HashTagGames
#RIPJimmy 🦜

Nibblin' on sponge cake
Watchin' the sun bake

#LastMinuteSummerPlans
#HashtagGames
#RIPJimmy

@ClintEssential loved listening to his music. #RIPJimmy
I feel like a member of my family died or a part of me died. I'm very sad. #RIPJimmy
Wir brauchen nicht nur ein Digitalministerium. Ich fordere das Jimmy-Schulz-Ministerium für Digitales. #ripjimmy