Apologetics: Flippin’ Fatwa Friday – Muhammad was the Gayest Guy in Arabia Part 1: Dihyah al-Kalbi

It’s June and you know what that means – it’s Pride month. Thus, to take advantage of this month’s unwanted theme, we need to talk about something extremely embarrassing for Islam: the fact that there is significant evidence in the hadiths that Muhammad was not only bisexual, but was a cross-desser.

You read that right. According to the hadiths, the founder of the most antagonistic religion towards the LGBTQ+ community was LGBTQ+ himself. Thus, we’ll look at three of the most damning instances of this recorded in the hadiths over the course of the month, starting with the story of Dihyah al-Kalbi, (a.k.a Dihyah bin Khalifa), one of the strangest people in the hadiths.

Dihyah was a young man from Medina – about 30 years younger than Muhammad – who was known for his looks. Sahih al-Bukhari 3634 describes him as a “handsome person amongst the companions of the prophet” and it’s frequently commented upon in numerous hadiths (including the one quoted) that he looked like the angel Gabriel. For example:

Sahih al-Bukhari 4980:

I was informed that Gabriel came to the Prophet (ﷺ) while Um Salama was with him. Gabriel started talking (to the Prophet). Then the Prophet (ﷺ) asked Um Salama, “Who is this?” She replied, “He is Dihya (al-Kalbi).” When Gabriel had left, Um Salama said, “By Allah, I did not take him for anybody other than him (i.e. Dihya) till I heard the sermon of the Prophet (ﷺ) wherein he informed about the news of Gabriel.” The subnarrator asked Abu Uthman: From whom have you heard that? Abu Uthman said: From Usama bin Zaid.

 Sunan an-Nasa’i 4991:

“The Messenger of Allah [SAW] would sit among his Companions and if a stranger came, he would not know which of them was he (the Prophet [SAW]) until he asked. So we suggested to the Messenger of Allah [SAW] that we should make a dais for him so that any stranger would know him if he came to him. So we built for him a bench made of clay on which he used to sit. (One day) we were sitting and the Messenger of Allah [SAW] was sitting in his spot, when a man came along who was the most handsome and good-smelling of all people, and it was as if no dirt had ever touched his garments. He came near the edge of the rug and greeted him, saying: ‘Peace be upon you, O Muhammad!’ He returned the greeting, and he said: ‘Shall I come closer, O Muhammad?’ He came a little closer, and he kept telling him to come closer, until he put his hands on the knees of the Messenger of Allah [SAW]. He said: ‘O Muhammad, tell me, what is Islam?’ He said: ‘Islam means to worship Allah and not associate anything with Him; to establish Salah, to pay Zakah, to perform Hajj to the House, and to fast Ramadan.’ He said: ‘If I do that, will I have submitted (be a Muslim)?’ He said: ‘Yes.’ He said: ‘You have spoken the truth,’ we found it odd. He said: ‘O Muhammad, tell me, what is faith?’ He said: ‘To believe in Allah [SWT], His Angels, the Book, the Prophets, and to believe in the Divine Decree.’ He said: ‘If I do that, will I have believed?’ The Messenger of Allah [SAW] said: ‘Yes.’ He said: ‘You have spoken the truth.’ He said: ‘O Muhammad, tell me, what is Al-Ihsan?’ He said: ‘To worship Allah [SWT] as if you can see Him, for although you cannot see Him, He can see you.’ He said: ‘You have spoken the truth.’ He said: ‘O Muhammad, tell me about the Hour.’ He lowered his head and did not answer. Then he repeated the question, and he did not answer. Then he repeated the question (a third time) and he did not answer. Then he raised his head and said: ‘The one who is being asked does not know more than the one who is asking. But it has signs, by which it may be known. When you see the herdsmen competing in building tall buildings, when you see the barefoot and naked ruling the Earth, when you see a woman giving birth to her mistress. Five things which no one knows except Allah [SWT]. Verily, Allah, with Him (alone) is the knowledge of the Hour up to His saying: ‘Verily, Allah is All-Knower, All-Aware (of things).’ Then he said: ‘No, by the One who sent Muhammad with the truth, with guidance and glad tidings, I did not know him more than any man among you. That was Jibril, peace be upon you, who came down in the form of Dihyah Al-Kalbi.'”

 Ash-Shama’il Al-Muhammadiyah 13:

On the authority of Jabir ibn ‘Abdi’llah, that Allah’s Messenger said (Allah bless him and give him peace):

“The Prophets were presented to me, and there was Moses (peace be upon him), a specimen of the men of distinction, as if he were among the men of pure lineage and manly virtue [shanu’a]. I also saw Jesus the son of Mary (peace be upon him), and the nearest I have seen in resemblance to him is ‘Urwa ibn Mas’ud. I also saw Abraham (peace be upon him), and the nearest I have seen in resemblance to him is your Companion (meaning himself). I also saw Gabriel (peace be upon him), and the nearest I have seen in resemblance to him is Dihya.”

 This raises several questions. First of all, why would Gabriel be so vain as to appear in the form of the most handsome man in Arabia? Why not – as an angel – appear in a human form more beautiful than Dihyah if Gabriel was so intent on looking good?

Second, why appear as Dihyah at all when all it would do is just cause confusion? After all, in one account by Ibn Kathir, Gabriel passed by some people and when asked about it, they thought Dihyah had passed them. A similar account is also provided by Ibn Hisham. Wouldn’t it be easier if Gabriel appeared to people as a different dude?

Third, why would Gabriel appear to Muhammad as Dihyah? Why not appear to the prophet of Islam in his usual form? We know from Surah 53:5-18 and numerous hadiths about the revelation of this verse that Muhammad had seen Gabriel’s true form, so why didn’t Gabriel just go with that form?

Now, while the descriptions of Dihyah’s looks alone and the suspicious nature of Gabriel’s appearances as Dihyah don’t prove that Muhammad was bi, it does make this next hadith very suspicious. According to Sahih al-Bukhari 3227,  Sahih al-Bukhari 5960,  Sahih Muslim 2104a,  Sunan Abi Dawud 4157, Sahih Muslim 2105, Sunan Abi Dawud 4158, and other sahih (authentic) hadiths, Gabriel had promised to visit Muhammad at some point during the night. Muhammad waited, but Gabriel never showed up. Later, when Muhammad saw him again, Gabriel explained that he was prevented from coming into the house because there was a dog.

Already, this is very suspicious. Why would Gabriel be meeting Muhammad at night? And why would he be afraid of a dog when, if we’re to believe the Bible, angels aren’t afraid of animals at all?

Well, if we put together all the evidence that “Gabriel” was actually Dihyah al-Kalbi and take a closer look at this story, we can see that this likely wasn’t so much an angelic visit as a homosexual rendezvous. Why else would Dihyah, posing as Gabriel be coming to Muhammad’s house at night and be unable to enter because there was a dog? Likely, he was trying to be sneaky about it and didn’t want the dog barking, alerting everyone to his prescence.

Additional information that makes this story even more suspicious is that it was “Gabriel’s” tendency to visit Muhammad every night during Ramadan. Sahih al-Bukhari 3220 records:

Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) was the most generous of all the people, and he used to be more generous in the month of Ramadan when Gabriel used to meet him. Gabriel used to meet him every night in Ramadan to study the Holy Qur’an carefully together. Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) used to become more generous than the fast wind when he met Gabriel.

This event isn’t a standalone narration. Similar accounts are found throughout the hadiths, many of them sahih. I guess this was the original “study session,” if you catch my drift. The fact that this happened during Ramadan at night when the ban on fasting from food, drink, and intercourse was over makes this even more suspicious. It conveniently provided a religious cover for Muhammad and Dihyah while also allowing them to be together as everyone else was busy partying.

But trust me. This is only scratching the surface. We have yet to talk about Muhammad running around in Aisha’s mirt or the infamous night of al-Zutt.

Until next time,

M.J.

#Apologetics #Blog #DihyahAlKalbi #faith #Gabriel #hadith #history #Islam #jesus #LGBTQ #Muhammad #OpinionPeice #Polemics #PrideMonth #Quran #Writing

Apologetics: Flippin’ Fatwa Friday – No. Muhammad Isn’t in The Bible.

One of the impromptu series of shorts that I’m doing on my YouTube channel is one addressing the claim that the Bible prophesies the coming of Muhammad. Now, for any of us who have read the Bible, the claim that the Bible prophesies Muhammad’s coming is absurd. The closest the Bible comes to saying anything about Muhammad (or really any other “prophet”) is in the numerous verses and passages warning about false teachers. However, the Muslims keep pushing on with this utter lie, so let’s take a look at some of the most popular scriptures that they take out of context.

#1: Deut 18:18

Deuteronomy 18:18 is one of the passages that is constantly taken out of context by Muslims. This passage says:

18 I will raise up for them a prophet like you [Moses] from among their fellow Israelites, and I will put my words in his mouth. He will tell them everything I command him.

According to Muslims, Muhammad fits the bill. They claim that Muhammad was like Moses in that he spoke to God, led people, and established a sort of new covenant. As for the part about the person needed to be an Israelite, that’s irrelevant! After all, some translations of this verse say, “from among their brethren” instead of the vastly more specific “fellow Israelites.” Thus, since Ishmael, the father of the Arab people was Issac’s half-brother, it’s close enough, right?

Except it’s not.

The main issue here is that “from among their brethren” would have been understood by the Israelites as God specifying that the one to come must be an Israelite. Muhammad, however, was Arab, which, at best, made him a distant cousin of the Israelites through Ishmael. Because of that alone, he can’t be the one being spoken about, especially since nowhere in the Bible are the Ishmaelites considered brethren in any way.

Additionally, Muhammad fails to be a prophet like Moses in other ways. While he claimed to speak to Allah directly during the Night Journey, the vast majority of his revelations were received from Gabriel. Meanwhile, Moses never had any intermediary to give him messages from God. He spoke directly to Him. This means that Muhammad fails on two other accounts; he didn’t speak the words God directly put in his mouth, and it’s – at best – questionable if he ever spoke to God (or what he thought was God) face to face.

Even more damning is that while Moses performed miracles and signs and wonders, Muhammad did not. In fact, numerous times throughout the Quran, it denies that he ever performed any miracles. (On the off chance that it does say he performed a miracle such as the splitting of the moon, that’s yet another contradiction in the Quran.)

The final bit of evidence that Muhammad couldn’t be the prophet spoken about is the fact that in the same chapter of Deuteronomy, we find it saying this in verse 19-22:

19 And it shall be that whoever will not hear My words, which He speaks in My name, I will require it of him. 20 But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in My name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that prophet shall die.’ 21 And if you say in your heart, ‘How shall we know the word which the Lord has not spoken?’— 22 when a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord, if the thing does not happen or come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously; you shall not be afraid of him.

By this standard, Muhammad fails miserably, as according to numerous Islamic scholars, Muhammad recited the “Satanic Verses,” in which he told the people of Mecca that it was totally fine to pray to three goddesses already worshipped there for intercession with Allah. Later, when questioned about it, Muhammad replied that Satan had given him those verses. That’s also not even mentioning the various prophecies he made that never came true.

#2: John 14:16-17

Of all the worst places to try to arbitrarily shove Muhammad, the Gospel of John is easily the worst, as it’s the most overtly theological of all the Gospels.

According to Muslims, when Jesus talks about sending an advocate, that this advocate/”Spirit of Truth” is Muhammad. However, Jesus makes it very clear in John 14:26 that the advocate/”Spirit of Truth” is the Holy Spirit.

Because of this, the Muslims switch gears and say that the Holy Spirit is just another term for Gabriel. However, the issue with that is the Quran never supports this understanding. For example, in Surah 15:28-29 when Allah is creating Man, he says that he will breathe into it his spirit. If this spirit is to be understood as the Holy Spirit as found in the Bible, then it would seem that the Quran affirms the existence of the Holy Spirit (though it seems extremely disjointed in its understanding of it.) If this is Gabriel, however, then the question must be asked why Allah had a finite being help in creation.

Moreover, we can also look at how the Quran records Mary’s conception of Jesus. Once again, we see that Allah’s Spirit breathed into Mary to create Jesus. However, al-Tabari clarifies that this spirit was none other than Gabriel. Thus, if only Allah is capable of creation, then if his spirit is Gabriel, then Gabriel is Allah as he is an active participant in creating everything. Either the Spirit is Allah and not Gabriel, or the spirit is Gabriel, meaning that either Allah is Gabriel or there are multiple gods.

Even more damning is that the idea of Allah’s spirit doesn’t line up well with the Biblical understanding of the Holy Spirit. The Biblical understanding is that the Holy Spirit is God (as in the third person of the Trinity), and is referred to as personal, is omnipresent, omniscient, and omnipotent, is a person, is the author of regeneration, is creator, is Israel’s redeemer, etc. In the Bible whenever an angel appears, they never identify themselves with the Holy Spirit. The authors of the Old and New Testaments certainly didn’t consider the angels to be the Holy Spirit, as they always clarify that the being is an angel of God. Thus, this arguments falls flat on its face.

#3: John 16:7

See #2, as John 16:7 is part of the Farewell/Upper Room Discourse that Jesus gave during the Last Supper, which spans chapters 13-17 of the Gospel of John.

#4: Daniel 7:13

This is a less commonly used passage, but some Muslims will say that this is referring to the Night Journey. However, unless they think that you should worship Muhammad (as it’s said that the one prophesied will be worshipped by “all nations and peoples of every language,”) then this isn’t referring to Muhammad’s coming. This is clearly talking about Jesus and was why He called Himself the “Son of Man.”

#5: Isaiah 42:1-11

To say that this passage refers to Muhammad is not only an example of isogesis, but is simply bad hermeneutics. Isaiah 42:1-11 is part of the four Servant Songs and when all of them are taken into consideration, they paint a startlingly clear picture of the life and death of Jesus. Because of that, to use this passage to support the idea that Muhammad was prophesied in the Bible is a painfully dishonest argument, as it ignores the broader context of the chapter.

Until next time,

M.J.

#Apologetics #Bible #BiblicalProphecy #Blog #Christian #Christianity #faith #FlippinFatwaFriday #god #Islam #jesus #Muhammad #Muslim #OpinionPeice #Polemics #Prophecy #Writing

Apologetics: Flippin’ Fatwa Friday – A Comparison of Claims About the Insanity of Jesus and the Insanity of Muhammad. (Part 1)

One of the many questions critics of various religions ask when evaluating the validity of the religion’s claims is the question of its founder’s mental health. If it can be proven that the founder’s claims came from delusions, then the religion risks being dismissed as the ramblings of a madman. As C.S. Lewis put it in his famous trilemma regarding Jesus, “A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic – on a level with the man who says he is a poached egg or else he would be the Devil of Hell. […] Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse…You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon; or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God.” (Paragraph 1, sentences 3-4, 6) (17) A similar framework can be applied to Muhammad, as – like Jesus – he was accused of lunacy both by contemporaries and modern critics. Either Jesus and Muhammad were delusional but sincerely believed what they said, were charlatans, or one of them was telling the truth about who they were. Thus, this paper seeks to examine their lives to see if the accusations of insanity hold historical or psychological weight. 

To begin our investigation into if Jesus and Muhammad were insane, we must understand the various disorders that Muhammad and Jesus are believed to have had. Critics of both men have alleged based on various accounts of their lives that they could have had various mental or neurological disorders. (19) In fact, in 2012, a team of psychiatrists, behavioral psychologists, neurologists, and neuropsychiatrists from Harvard Medical School published research that suggested the development of a new diagnostic category of psychiatric disorders related to religious delusions and hyper-religiosity. (19) They claimed that Jesus, Muhammad, and others may have had anything ranging from schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, delusional disorder, delusions of grandeur, auditory-visual hallucinations, paranoia, Geschwind syndrome, or temporal lobe epilepsy. (19) Thus, we need to understand the symptoms of some of these disorders to compare them to what accounts of Jesus and Muhammad’s life may suggest. 

Because critics have long alleged that Jesus and Muhammad had epilepsy, we must understand what it is and understand its key manifestations before comparing them to the historical record. Epilepsy isn’t a mental illness, (4) but is a neurological condition that causes recurring seizures, (5) potentially leading to cognitive or psychological problems depending on its severity or if it’s left untreated. (4) It cannot be caused by volition, suggestion or hypnosis, (7) but is likely caused by genetic influences, head trauma, underlying factors in the brain, infections, injury before birth, or developmental issues. (5) Some potential triggers of epileptic fits include alcohol, flashing lights, drug use, lack of sleep, stress, dehydration, skipped meals, and illness. (5) Due to the unpredictability of epileptic seizures and the disorder’s stigmatized condition, epilepsy patients often experience poor self-esteem, discrimination, social withdrawal, and depression. (6) This was especially true in the ancient world, as Hasan Aziz writes, “The general perceptions then of those affected with epilepsy was of a tainted, incurable victim possessed by an evil spirit or devil, and the claim to Muhammad’s epilepsy was probably in response to this situation to slander him as a false prophet. Men of letters from the subsequent eras picked up these early narrations and quoted them per se without any verification, further substantiating these nonscientific works as the truth.” (Paragraph 9, sentence 3-4) (7) 

Epilepsy is diagnosed if the patient has had at least two seizures without a clear cause at least 24 hours apart. (5) In general, epileptic attacks last for a few seconds or a few minutes. (7) Symptoms vary depending on the type of seizure and how it affects different brain processes. (5) Epilepsy patients can experience staring spells, loss of awareness or consciousness, convulsions, muscle stiffness, fear and anxiety, behavioral changes, psychosis, or deja vu. (5) Seizures that cause deja vu or hallucinations usually last for a split second and lack verbal content. (7) Those that cause auditory hallucinations produce a machine-like buzzing or whistling sound. (7) Seizures can also cause repeated movements such as hand rubbing, chewing, swallowing, or walking in circles. (5) Patients usually have the same type of seizure every time they experience an epileptic fit. (5) 

On that note, there are different types of epilepsy diagnosed by what types of seizures the patient experiences and which part of the brain they affect. (5) Seizures are split into two groups with various subgroups, based on how they affect the brain. (5) Seizures that involve all areas of the brain are called generalized seizures and are further divided into absence, tonic, atonic, clonic, myclonic, and tonic-clonic seizures. (5) 

The second group of seizures are known as focal seizures and result from activity in one part of the brain, such as the temporal, frontal, or occipital lobe. (5) These seizures can be mistaken for migraines, narcolepsy, or mental illness. (5) Like with generalized seizures, these are split into two subcategories based on seizure symptoms. (5) These categories are called preserved or impaired consciousness. (5) During seizures with preserved consciousness, patients may have warning signs known as “auras.” (5) These auras may include a strange feeling in the stomach, fear, deja vu, a taste or smell, a visual effect such as steady or flashing light, color, or shape, dizziness, loss of balance, emotional changes, convulsions, tingling, dizziness, or hallucinations. (5) Seizures that impair consciousness, however, involve a change or loss of consciousness in the patient, sometimes leading to a dreamy state. (5) 

From looking at the accounts of Muhammad and Jesus’ lives; it doesn’t appear that they suffered from generalized seizures. If one is to say that either person suffered from epilepsy, they likely would have experienced focal seizures, pointing to a form of epilepsy, either affecting the frontal, occipital, or temporal lobe. Thus, symptoms from those specific seizures must be examined as well. 

Starting with occipital and frontal lobe seizures, seizures in the occipital lobe affect patients’ vision, sometimes causing hallucination or loss of some or all their vision. (5) Frontal lobe seizures, on the other hand, begin in the front of the brain and mainly affects motion. (5) Those experiencing a frontal lobe seizure may move their heads or eyes to one side, won’t respond when spoken to, may scream or laugh, extend one arm while flexing the other, or make repeated movements. (5)  

Temporal lobe seizures, however, occur in the lobes that process emotions and short-term memory. (5) They may cause a patient to lose awareness of their surroundings. (5) Temporal lobe epilepsy also brings with it a higher risk of developing psychiatric problems than in patients who have more generalized symptoms. (6) Short-term memory loss can come with it, too, potentially since these seizures impair the areas of the brain that process emotion. (4) 

Moreover, epilepsy and psychiatric disorders may have shared pathogenic mechanisms. (6) This could mean that, in some cases, the presence of psychiatric disorders may represent the premorbid phase of some epileptic syndromes due to shared neurobiological mechanisms. (6) Studies have found that epileptics have a 2-5 times increased risk of developing any psychiatric disorder with a third of patients having a lifetime psychiatric diagnosis. (6) Epilepsy can cause depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts and behaviors, (5) potentially from forcing specific behaviors such as maintaining regular sleep cycles, limited alcohol use, and other lifestyle changes, combined with preexisting stress, frustration, fear, and embarrassment from having seizures. (4) Data from prospective observational studies show that the relationship between epilepsy and psychiatric disorders goes both ways. (6) One study from the United Kingdom involving over 10 million subjects found that depression caused a 2.5-fold increased risk of developing epilepsy and suicide risk increased 2.9-fold even before diagnosis. (6) A meta-analysis of adults in 14 population-based studies that included over a million subjects also showed an overall prevalence of active depression in epilepsy patients of 23.1% with an increased risk of developing depression of 2.7 as compared to the general population. (6) As PubMed writes: “From a neurobiological perspective, neuroimaging studies in people with primary psychiatric conditions such as depression or schizophrenia have shown abnormalities in brain networks overlapping with those involved, for example, in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), particularly in the amygdala and the hippocampi.” (Paragraph 4, sentence 3) (6) 

Generalized anxiety disorder is another psychiatric issue that’s often present in epilepsy patients, with causes varying from the diagnosis, a symptom of seizures, fear stemming from the first seizure, and social isolation or rejection. (4) However, just like depression, causes of epilepsy can also contribute to anxiety symptoms. (4) One meta-analysis of 27 studies in over three thousand adults with epilepsy showed a pooled prevalence of anxiety disorders of 20.2%, with generalized anxiety disorder being the most common. (6) 

Epilepsy can also cause slowness, memory impairment, attention problems, and dementia. (4) Cognitive and intellectual problems caused by epilepsy are often related to it beginning at an early age, the number or frequency of seizures, poor seizure control, the length of the seizure, low oxygen levels, injury, infection at birth, or underlying brain lesions. (4) For young children, development can be delayed due to uncontrolled seizures, and in those with underlying cognitive problems, there are higher rates of brain abnormalities, which can result in different kinds of seizures. (4) 

Most concerningly, however, is epilepsy’s effect on psychosis. Psychiatric comorbidities are associated with premature mortality for a variety of reasons, such as an increased risk of substance or alcohol abuse, increased risk of injury, and suicidality. (6) A meta-analysis of 57 studies of psychosis and related disorders including over 40 thousand individuals showed a pooled prevalence of 5.6% in unselected individuals increasing to 7% and in those with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy having a greater risk of 7.8% compared to the general population. (6) These psychiatric symptoms are categorized as preictal, ictal, postictal, paraictal, and interictal according to their relationship with seizures. (6) 

Preictal symptoms precede a seizure and mostly occur during tonic-clonic seizures or temporal lobe epilepsy. (6) Preictal psychosis can include irritability, insomnia, and dysphoria that can last anywhere from a few hours to two days. (6) 

Ictal symptoms are manifestations of a seizure and may present as focal aware seizures. (6) These can cause nonmotor, emotional dysfunction (ictal fear or depression), and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (ictal psychosis). (6) 4% of epilepsy patients who experience complex partial seizures have religious experiences during psychosis called religious ictal seizures. (7) The symptoms of this vary, but those who experience this describe intense emotions of God’s presence, hearing his voice, feeling connected to the infinite, clairvoyance telepathy, repetition, or a visual hallucination of a religious figure. (7) Emotions felt during these events are generally indescribable. (7) There is also near total amnesia of all ictal events, and memory varies, with those events being followed by periods of sleep or blunted meditations, which distort memory, making it unreliable. (7) 

Postictal symptoms typically follow a bilateral tonic-clonic seizure but are also associated with temporal lobe epilepsy. (6) The resulting psychosis only affects about 2% of people. (6) Despite this, postictal psychosis is the most described and investigated form of psychosis and is also associated with temporal lobe epilepsy. (6) Postictal psychosis involves having florid, but brief psychotic episodes lasting hours or weeks, often described as worsening comorbid mood or anxiety disorders. (6) The onset of this psychosis is subtle, coming after 48 hours of lucid interval from the seizure and has a high mortality risk due to high suicidal ideation and violent behavior. (6)  

Paraictal symptoms involve forced normalization and behavior disturbance of acute or subacute onset. (6) This involves significant mood changes, anxiety, depersonalization or derealization, and psychogenic, nonepileptic attacks, as well as a reduction in the total number of spikes. (6) After paraictal symptoms have run their course, there can be a complete cessation of seizures for at least one week. (6) 

Finally, interictal symptoms can cause personality disorders like Geschwind syndrome characterized by obsessionality, increased philosophical or religious interests, hyposexuality, and hypergraphia. (6) Interictal symptoms – like ictal and postictal symptoms – are usually found in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. (6) It also involves schizophrenia-like, chronic psychosis with preserved affect and without progressive cognitive deterioration. (6) Interictal symptoms can also come with interictal dysphoric disorder with chronic affective somatoform syndrome, characterized by mood swings with irritability with multiple somatic symptoms. (6) 

Now that the symptoms of epilepsy have been laid out, one can move to determining if Jesus or Muhammad had symptoms resembling epilepsy. Starting with Jesus, if it could be proven that He had epilepsy that caused Him to believe that He was hearing from God, then it would cause a massive fracture in the validity of the Christian faith. (21) However, while psychiatrists and religious scholars and writers agree that Jesus was regarded as insane, delusional, or even demon possessed by family, friends, followers, and contemporaries (Mark 3:21, John 7:20, 10:19-21) (3, 19) there is no reference of Jesus ever having epilepsy or anything resembling it. The beliefs of critics such as Jean Meslier, David Straus, Lemuel K. Washburn, Oskar Holtzmann, Henry Leffmann, Georg Lomer, Oskar Panizza, Y.V. Mints, William Hirsh, and others that Jesus had epilepsy (19) are thus woefully unfounded. 

The same cannot be said about Muhammad, however. Muhammad was considered epileptic during the Byzantine period, about 200 years after his death. (7) Since then, this diagnosis has become a great theological and philosophical debate, raising questions about the validity of his prophethood, suggesting that he pretended his fits were revelation from Allah passed on through the angel Gabriel. (7, 13, 22) This was first brought up by Byzantine monk and early Greek chronicler, Theophanes, in the 8th century who suggested that Muhammad’s revelations were epileptic episodes. (7) Western historians, theologians, orientalists and physicians such as Humphrey Prideaux, Hottinger (a Swiss philologist and theologian), John Zonaras, Gustav Weil, (who was perhaps the first to probe into the oldest traditional biographies of Muhammad) Sir William Muir, and others believed this theory. (7)  

Modern-day, eminent neurologists have also agreed with this assessment, suggesting based on the writings of these orientalists, historians, and chronologists that Muhammad had temporal lobe epilepsy. (7) Prominent American neurologists such as William Gordon Lennox and Roy Freemon made significant contributions to this debate. (7) Lennox wrote in his book Epilepsy and Related Disorders that Muhammad had temporal lobe epilepsy based on hallucinatory auras recorded by Muir, including two losses of consciousness at age 2. (7) Freemon wrote what was possibly the first article on Muhammad’s epilepsy to be published in a scientific journal. (7) He concluded that Muhammad likely had psychomotor seizures from temporal lobe epilepsy, though historical knowledge of his brain function during altered states of consciousness doesn’t allow for an unequivocal diagnosis. (7) 

Furthermore, though some incorrect or erroneous translations have been found, reliable hadiths are available to provide evidence that Muhammad was potentially epileptic. (7) Starting with possible accounts of Muhammad having epilepsy from childhood, according to Sahih al-Bukhari 7571, Muhammad had a dream that Gabriel cut open his chest, took out his organs, veins, etc., washed them, put them back, and took him to visit heaven. (1) This hadith may be related to a similar account in Sahih Muslim, which says: “It is narrated on the authority of Anas b. Malik that the Messenger of Allah said: the angels came to me and took me to the Zamzam and my heart was opened and washed with the water of Zamzam and then I was left (at my place).” (Sahih Muslim 162b) (1) This account continues in Sahih Muslim 162c in more detail, saying, “Anas b. Malik reported that Gabriel came to the Messenger of Allah while he was playing with his playmates. He took hold of him and lay him prostrate on the ground and tore open his breast and took out the heart from it and said: That was the part of Satan in thee. And then he washed it with the water of Zamzam in a golden basin and then it was joined together and restored to its place. The boys came running to his mother, i.e. his nurse, and said: Verily Muhammad has been murdered. They all rushed toward him (and found him all right) his color was changed, Anas said. I myself saw the marks of needle on his breast.” (1) 

This event, known as Shaq al-Sadar (The Opening of the Chest), happened when Muhammad was a young child, out grazing cattle with his foster brother Abdullah ibn Harith. (10) Muhammad reportedly remembered the incident, as did Abdullah, Muhammad’s other foster siblings, and the other boys present. (10) One report also alleged that Halima, Muhammad’s wet-nurse and foster mother, had a dream about Shaq al-Sadar before it happened and had tried to stop Muhammad from going out. (10)   

As one author who calls himself Silas writes regarding Shaq al-Sadar, “Here is the story told by Muhammad’s wet-nurse, related in Guillaume’s translation of Ibn Ishaw, page 72: ‘His [Muhammad’s friends] father said to me, ‘I am afraid that this child has had a stroke, so take him back to his family before the result appears. … She [Muhammad’s mother] asked me what happened and gave me no peace until I told her. When she asked if I feared a demon had possessed him, I replied that I did.” (paragraph 4, sentence 2 – paragraph 5) (13) 

Interestingly, Islamic scholars such as al-Tabari and Ibn Sa’d used “fits,” “epilepsy,” “epileptic,” “falling sickness,” or “sara’a” in their chapters about Muhammad’s life, referring to the Shaq al-Sadar. (7) Tabari specifically called it a malady; Ibn Ishaw called it a stroke, and later writers such as Hisham and Sprenger called it an epileptic fit or hysteria respectively. (7) This is significant, as epilepsy was a condition known to Arab physicians at the time, and one hadith even mentions a person with epilepsy going to Muhammad for help, as recorded by Ibn Abbas. (7) William Muir, in his book, Life of Mahomet, similarly interpreted the story of 4-year-old Muhammad having his heart cut out by two angels (as told in Katib al Wackedi) as epilepsy. (7) He also added a comment from Halima’s husband that Muhammad “had a fit (omeeb) and advised his wife to return Muhammad to his mother.” (7) 

This is not the only instance where Muhammad had an experience that appears to be like epilepsy. Accounts of Muhammad’s initial revelation and later revelation from authoritative hadiths like Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim sound similar to epileptic symptoms. As written in Sahih Bukhari 4951, “Then Allah’s Messenger returned with that experience; and the muscles between his neck and shoulders were trembling till he came upon Khadija (his wife) and said, ‘Cover me!’ They covered him, and when the state of fear was over, he said to Khadija, ‘O Khadija! What is wrong with me? I was afraid that something bad might happen to me.” (1)  Sahih Bukhari 6982 also continues the story of the initial revelation, saying, ““But after a few days Waraqa died and the Divine Inspiration was also paused for a while and the Prophet became so sad as we have heard that he intended several times to throw himself from the tops of high mountains and every time he went to throw himself down, Gabriel would appear before him and say, “O Muhammad! You are indeed Allah’s messenger in truth” whereupon his heart would do as before, but when he used to reach the top of a mountain, Gabriel would appear before him and say to him what he had said before.” (1) From this account, Theophanes writes: “He had an epileptic seizure, and when his wife noticed this, she became very distressed, for she was noble and had now been joined to a man who was not only helpless but epileptic as well. He turned to conciliating her, saying, ‘I see a vision of the angel known as Gabriel, and faint and fall because I cannot bear up under the sight of him.” (paragraph 10, sentence 4-5) (7) 

Though the trembling could be explained as being caused by fear and the suicidality from depression about Waraqa’s death, that does not adequately explain other strange symptoms that came before later revelations. Muhammad’s wife, Aisha, is recorded asking Muhammad what it was like receiving revelation from Allah. (1) His response, recorded in Sahih Muslim 2333b was, ““[…] at times it comes to me like the ringing of a bell…” (1) This is statement is corroborated by Sahih Bukhari 2, which says, “Narrated Aisha: […] Al-Harith bin Hisham asked Allah’s Messenger ‘O Allah’s Messenger! How is the Divine Inspiration revealed to you?’ Allah’s Messenger replied, ‘Sometimes it is (revealed) like the ringing of a bell, this form of Inspiration is the hardest of all and then this state passes off after I have grasped what is inspired.’” (1) Sunan an-Nasa’i 933 also records this event. (1) 

Already, this is strange, but other pre-revelation symptoms include phobic states such as anxiety, sweating, palpitations, trembling, visual and auditory hallucinations, and fainting. (7) As one hadith records: “At the moment of inspiration, anxiety pressed upon the Prophet and his countenance was troubled. He fell to the ground like an inebriate, or one overcome by sleep. On the coldest day his forehead would be bedewed with large drops of perspiration…To outward appearance inspiration descended unexpectedly, without any previous warning to the Prophet.” (paragraph 18, sentence 3-5) (7) Once again, Sahih Bukhari 2 also corroborates this, with Aisha saying, “Verily I saw the Prophet being inspired divinely on a very cold day and noticed that sweat dropping from his forehead (as the Inspiration was over).” (1) 

Muslim apologists argue that these pre-revelation symptoms are simply general discomfort that is to be expected during divine-to-human transfer. (7) However, despite the evidence so closely mirrors temporal-lobe epileptic auras that it’s no surprise that Ibn Sa’d devoted an entire chapter in Tabqat-al-Kabir to the symptoms associated with revelations, from which Freemon based his conclusions that Muhammad had temporal lobe epilepsy. (7) From this, Prideaux’s theory that Muhammad had epileptic fits that he used to compile chapters (surahs) of the Quran becomes plausible. (7)  

In response to this, Muslims have several arguments to the contrary. On the Shaq al-Sadar, Hasan Aziz says, “From neurological or any other perspective, this episode extraordinaire of a child surviving splitting open of his chest or belly to be closed within minutes and later relating the details himself or witnessed by his foster [sibling] is probably paranormal and cannot be accepted as epilepsy or any human happening.” (Paragraph 14, sentence 6) (7) Aziz also writes concerning the physical accompaniments of Muhammad’s revelations, quote, “On some occasions at least, there were some physical accompaniments. He would be gripped by a feeling of pain, and in his ears, there would be a noise like the reverberation of a bell. Even on a very cold day the bystanders would see great pearls of sweat on his forehead as the revelation descended upon him. Such accounts led some Western critics to suggest that he had epilepsy, but there are no real grounds for such a view. Epilepsy leads to physical and mental degeneration, and there are no signs of that in Muhammad; on the contrary, he was in full possession of his faculties to the very end of life.” (paragraph 21, sentence 3-7) (7)  

Another point that Aziz makes is that after every pre-revelation event, there was a Quranic revelation. (7) He argues that had it been a result of an epileptic attack, the revelations should not have been remembered as epileptic attacks are commonly followed by stupor, confusion, and amnesia. (7) It’s also reported in some hadiths that a buzzing could be heard by others before Muhammad went into one of his revelatory swoons, further refuting the idea that he was simply experiencing epileptic hallucinations. (7) 

Further arguments against the idea that Muhammad had epilepsy are that some of the translations of the hadiths are flawed. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, a scholar of the Arabic language, worked on validating translations of the hadiths, finding inaccuracies and mistranslations. (7) When reviewing Muir’s translation of the Shaq al-Sadar, he pointed out that Muir’s translation of “omeeb” was incorrect, as it’s a word found in no Arabic lexicon and had no meaning. (7) The actual word was oseeb, which has many connotations that express dismay or affliction. (7)  Khan also commented on the per se translation of Abilfeda’s work into English by Dr. Edward Pococke, saying that his work was flawed as he added “hypochondriacal” to make the sentence flow more logically and grammatically in Latin, but changed the meaning of the entire sentence. (7) From there, since Prideaux had based his conclusions on Pococke’s work, Khan believed that Prideaux had reached a faulty conclusion from a faulty translation. (7) English historian Edward Gibbon also rejected Theophanes’ statements about Muhammad having epilepsy, calling them “an absurd calumny of the Greeks.” (7) Thomas Carlyle and William Montgomery Watts similarly rejected it, with Carlyle going so far as to paint Muhammad as a hero. (7)  

However, though epilepsy could be, at best a plausible explanation for Muhammad’s behavior, there are other explanations to take into account, such as his mental health, which will be discussed in part two.

Until next time,

M.J.

#Apologetics #Bible #Blog #Christian #Christianity #Epilepsy #faith #FlippinFatwaFriday #god #hadith #history #Islam #jesus #Medicine #MentalHealth #Muhammad #Muslim #OpinionPeice #Polemics #Quran #Research #Writing

John of Damascus

Born Yahya ibn Mansur. He was born into a wealthy Christian family in Damascus, which had fallen under the rule of the Umayyad Caliphate. He inherited his dad’s post as a high-ranking tax official (or “Grand Vizier, this was also Jafar’s title in Disney’s Aladdin) for the Caliph Abd al-Malik.

His grandpa, Mansur ibn Sarjun, was a prominent Byzantine official of Damascus, who’d been responsible for the taxes of the region during the reign of Emperor Heraclius & also served under Emperor Maurice. Mansur seems to have played a role in the capitulation of Damascus to the troops of Khalid ibn al-Walid in 635 after securing favorable conditions of surrender.

Because John lived in the Umayyad Caliphate, the Byzantine Emperor couldn’t touch him. John could talk smack about the Emperor’s theology from the safety of Damascus & Jerusalem. John spoke Arabic & Greek fluently. Around 706 CE, he left the worldly life of the Damascus court to become a monk at the Monastery of Mar Saba near Jerusalem.

He was a polymath whose fields of interest, & contribution, included law, theology, philosophy, & music. He was given the by-name of Chrysorroas (literally “streaming with gold”). John’s most notable historical contribution was his defense of: Icons. In the 720s, Byzantine Emperor Leo III began the “Iconoclasm” (image-breaking) Movement, ordering the destruction of all religious art. Leo argued that icons were idols & that God couldn’t be pictured.

John made a crucial distinction that still the difference between Catholic/Orthodox & some Protestant views on art today:

  • Latreia (Adoration): Worship reserved for God alone.
  • Doulia (Veneration): Honor or respect paid to a created thing (like a flag, a photograph of a loved one, or an icon.

“I do not worship matter, I worship the Creator of matter who became matter for my sake… & through accomplished my salvation.”

John was the 1st person to “systematize” Christian theology. Before him, theology was found in letters, sermons, & poems. John organized it like a modern textbook:

  • The Fountain of Knowledge:
    • His magnus opus. The 3rd part, The Orthodox Faith, became the gold standard for theology in the East & later influenced Thomas Aquinas in the West.
  • The Heresies in Epitome:
    • A list of 100 Heresies. Interestingly, number 100 was the “Heresies of the Ishmaelites” (Islam), providing 1 of the earliest Christian critiques of the new religion.
  • Hymnography:
    • He’s credited with writing much of the Octoechos – the book of 8 tones used in Orthodox liturgical singing.

Because John lived among Muslims, his perspective on Islam is a vital historical document. He didn’t see Islam as a completely “new” religion. But rather as a Christian heresy, a “mutilated” version of the faith. John praised their monotheism. He critiqued their view of Jesus (which he saw as ironically Docetic, as the Quran suggests Jesus only appeared to be crucified).

His writings formed the basis of Christian-Muslim polemics for the next 1,000 years. He remains a hero to those who believe that the physical world is capable of carrying the divine.

Make a one-time donation

Your contribution is appreciated.

Donate

Make a monthly donation

Your contribution is appreciated.

Donate monthly

Make a yearly donation

Your contribution is appreciated.

Donate yearly

#706CE #720s #Aladdin #Arabic #Byzantine #ByzantineEmperorLeoIII #CaliphAbdAlMalik #Catholic #Christian #Chrysorroas #Damascus #Docetic #Doulia #GrandVizier #Greek #HeresiesOfTheIsmaelites #Hymnography #Iconoclasm #Icons #Islam #Jerusalem #JohnOfDamascus #Latreia #MansurIbnSarjun #MarSaba #Muslim #Octoechos #Orthodox #Polemics #Polymath #TheFountainOfKnowledge #TheHeresiesInEpitome #TheOrthodoxFaith #ThomasAquinas #UmayyadCaliphate #YahyaIbnMansur

Gotta say, this is possibly the most beautifully-written #polemics against our current #CompSci state of insanity I've ever read.
Mapping Quotient Vectors on Five Fundamental Axes of Discourse

I am fairly confident that, between the five axes of human discourse that I refer to below, useful models can be constructed of psychological, sociological, and political viewpoint analysis.

John’s Substack

If you want good policy, there's decades of actual literature from #PoliticalScience and #Economics on what actually works.

You want less total plastic? Tax plastic by weight. Want fewer plastic items? Tax plastic by item. Want both? #Tax both.

#PigouvianTaxes actually work!

Tax #bioplastic _less_ than plastic. Because it actually causes less harm.

You know what you can do with that money? Compensate #poor people who are disproportionally impacted by the tax. Though, say, #grocery #subsidies.

I find it really hard to believe that our #politicians don't know any of this. I believe that, instead, the just care a ton more about the #optics of their policies than they care about the #environment or about #poverty.

When #polemics substitutes for #policy it dooms us all.

5/5

Save the date! Our annual Celebration of Collections is taking place on November 9, featuring some heavily annotated books belonging to Yaakov Emden, a 14th century Masoretic Bible on parchment, and polemics in Ladino that were separated and reunited!

https://facebook.com/events/s/norman-e-alexander-celebration/215883144812987/?mibextid=Gg3lNB

#hebrewmss #polemics #mazeldon @bookhistodons

@cbeunas
Let me be the first to say that #WaPo is not a "source" 😀

But the article was one the first to "agglomerate" such a two-third figure from ~activists.
It was in 2008 and then Eric #Zemmour took it to help grow his showing 😠

#FRPol #polemics #commOdon #racePolitics

Dieci righe 20

Considero la #religione il rifugio di coloro che hanno paura: affidarsi a qualcosa, a "qualcuno" di superiore significa aver timore che l'uomo non sap...

Transit