In case you missed it, last November a vulnerability in OpenReview led to a #dataleak of 10,000 confidential submissions to the International Conference on Learning and Representation (ICLR).
Leaked data included detailed reviewer information and no-longer-anonymous reviews.
Women are underrepresented in academia, especially in STEMM fields, at top institutions, and in senior positions. This study analyzes millions of biomedical and life science articles, revealing that female-authored articles spend longer under review than comparable male-authored articles, across most fields.
#PeerReviewing in the times of #AI and #llm 🤖 💻 🔬 :
#ChatGPT #AI #Code #Development #OpenAI #Google #Gemini #PairReview #Testing
- Update mirror integration tests to use probe_remote_reachable - Refactor branch action tests to mock git command helpers instead of run_git - Align changelog tests with get_changelog query API - ...
Deux des fondateurs de #PeerCommunityIn, Denis Bourguet et Thomas Guillemaud, plaident pour des décisions claires d’acceptation ou de rejet des #Préprints peer-reviewés car ⚠️ #PeerReviewing et Curation ne sont pas nécessairement des validations
➡️ https://www.coalition-s.org/blog/peer-reviewed-preprints-and-the-publish-review-curate-model/
<p>The traditional scientific publication model, characterized by gate-keeping editorial decisions, has come under increasing criticism. Opponents argue that it is too slow, opaque, unfair, lacking in qualifications, dominated by a small group of individuals, inefficient, and even obsolete. In response to these critiques, two alternatives have gained traction: peer-reviewed preprints and the Publish-Review-Curate (PRC) model […]</p>
#Vanity Journals, Conflicts of Interest, and the Quest for #Research #Integrity
👉 "November 2024 has been another intriguing month for the forensic #scientometrics community. A particular gem of a sentence from a paper in the 'International Journal of Hydrogen Energy’ has been making the rounds on social media and PubPeer, prompting lively discussions."
https://fosci.substack.com/p/vanity-journals-conflicts-of-interest
#VanityJournals #journals #publishing #academicpublishing #ScholComm #ethics #Elsevier #science #peerreviewing
AI-generated content has been discovered in prominent journals. Should peer reviewers be expected to find AI text in manuscripts? Where in the publication workflow should these checks be done?
Martin Robillard
gmcs
Kevin Veen-Birkenbach
Katharine O'Moore-Klopf, ELS
ndocist
Open Science Pasteur
François Renaville 🇺🇦🇪🇺
(((@amarois)))