So I've found that #Qwen35's training data knows everything about #Artemis up to this launch, #Artemis2. Knew the astronaut names, etc.
I only had vague notions about future missions, so I asked about it. And it mentioned the "Lunar Gateway". I looked that up on Wikipedia and it was quite accurate. However... it had no way to know the Gateway (an orbiting lunar support station) was axed by the Trump administration in favor of going directly towards building a lunar base.
Sounds to me like some orange baby said _"I want my admin to put a base on the moon, not just another lame ISS! DO IT OR YOU DON'T GET FUNDING!!"_ 🤷
But I'm open to different interpretations, of course. I'm just skeptical and ignorant of the actual science needs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Gateway
> On July 4, 2025, President Donald Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law, allocating $2.6 billion for the program and requiring at least $750 million annually from FY 2026 through FY 2028.
>
> In early 2026, reports indicated that references to the station had been removed from congressional funding legislation. On February 26, 2026, reporting suggested that NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman was considering restructuring the program toward a lunar surface base effort in Houston.
>
> In March 2026, NASA announced it would no longer build the station and would instead focus on a lunar surface base between 2029 and 2036, repurposing Gateway hardware and partner contributions where possible. Carlos Garcia-Galan, NASA's program manager for the Lunar Gateway, was reassigned to lead the surface base effort but stated that a lunar orbiting outpost "has value in our overall exploration goals" and that NASA may consider it later, but that the agency is now focused on the surface.
#nasa #llm #localLLM