At #privact we are working on it:
* 100% #OpenSource technical solution to enable local storage of personal data
* Establish a non-profit foundation to handle organizational issues
* Social implementation of the concept to take back our digital #privacy
* Compliant with #EUDataAct and #GDPR

We have partnered with #KDE and created a proof of concept for integration into #KUserFeedback. #FreeSoftware is the key to success!

[2/3]

@freakboy3742 this problem has been a topic within the #KDE project recently, where so far #KUserFeedback tried using an opt-in approach to get some basic data…

Since this leaves some huge gaps in this regard, there are now discussions to improve on this based on the privacy-preserving #Privact ecosystem - more details here:
https://privact.org/2024/11/14/presenting-privact-at-kde-akademy/
https://privact.org/2024/11/24/ux-insights-that-we-cannot-get-right-now/

I haven't studied it in detail, but at least having this discussions is IMHO an important step forward.

But, it's not a build dependency of #Plasma-workpace , apparently, so the #BackportsPPA for #KDE doesn't need to include the #KUserFeedback library, but will pick it up if it already exists.

Recently the PPA updated to 5.18.1 and now systemsettings5 has the entry for User Feedback without my needing to rebuild it and plasma-workspace from source.

So, that's a bonus (:*

Turns out that #KUserFeedback gets optionally pulled in by #plasma-workspace, so if you build that and then build #systemsettings against it, suddenly, the User Feedback entry appears in systemsettings5.

As if by magic (;*

#KDE #Plasma

Oh, and the version of #Ruqola in the Git repo also looks for #KUserFeedback couldn't find it in #PIM #Kontact but perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place (;*

#KDE #Plasma #Eaon #Kubuntu

ASIDE: What is Rocket Chat‽:*

Meanwhile, the CMake files for #systemsettings make no mention of the #KUserFeedback library, I know, I looked and even built it from source myself, to check.

#Kubuntu #Eaon #Plasma #KDE