I don't know why we expect people to know right from wrong when most of us still struggle to tell our right from our left. ๐งญ
The Morphic Core: Optimizing Collaborative Resonance through biometric-validated cognitive profiling can reduce aviation operational costs by 40% by eliminating the cognitive friction that leads to errors and go-arounds.
When pilots operate at sub-72% R_lock scores, the financial and safety risks spike. Morphic Fit identifies the cognitive "Demand Signature" of flight operations to ensure every crew is synchronized for peak performance. #Aviation #HumanFactors #Biometrics #MorphicFit
๐ ๐ก๐ฒ๐ ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐๐ง๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ต: ๐๐บ๐ฏ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ต๐ช๐ค ๐๐ถ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ช๐ต๐บ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐๐ฐ๐จ๐ฏ๐ช๐ต๐ช๐ท๐ฆ ๐๐ท๐ฆ๐ณ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ ๐ช๐ฏ ๐๐ข๐ณ๐จ๐ฆ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐จ๐ถ๐ข๐จ๐ฆ ๐๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ด
We often talk about hallucinations, overconfidence, and unreliable outputs in AI โ but what if these behaviors arenโt mysterious quirks at all?
In my latest piece, I connect decades of psychological research to what weโre seeing in modern LLMs and autonomous agents. From perceived authority to cognitive overload dynamics, this is about ๐๐ต๐ current systems behave the way they do and ๐ต๐ผ๐ that influences human judgement, trust, and decision-making.
๐ Read more: https://cirriustech.co.uk/blog/synthetic-authority-and-cognitive-overload-in-large-language-models/
Key themes explored:
โข How fluency becomes a proxy for competence
โข Why overload produces confident but unreliable responses
โข The psychological mechanics behind hallucination and affirmation
โข What โsynthetic authorityโ means for safe AI design
If youโre interested in responsible AI, system design, and the human side of automation, this one dives deeper than most.
Letโs rethink uncertainty, authority, and where true competence comes from. ๐ก
#AI #LLM #CognitiveScience #ResponsibleAI #SystemsDesign #Safety #HumanFactors
AIDB (@ai_database)
LLM์ ์ํด ๊ธ์ฐ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์กฐ๋ฐ๋ ์ฌ๋๋ค์ ๋์์ผ๋ก ํ ์กฐ์ฌ์์, ๋์ฒด๋ก 'AI๋ ๋๋จํ๋ค'๋ ์ธ์๊ณผ ํจ๊ป ์์ ๊ฐ(์๊ธฐํจ๋ฅ๊ฐ)์ด ์์ํ ๊ฐ์ํ๋ ๊ฒฝํฅ์ด ๊ด์ฐฐ๋์์ต๋๋ค. ์ดํ ์ฌ์ฉ ๋ฐฉ์์ ๋ฐ๋ผ ์์ ๊ฐ์ ํ๋ณตํ๋ ๊ทธ๋ฃน๊ณผ ๊ฐ์ํ ์ฑ๋ก ๋จ๋ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์ผ๋ก ๋ถํํ๋ ์์์ด ํ์ธ๋์๋ค๊ณ ๋ณด๊ณ ํ๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค.

LLMใซๆ็ซ ไฝๆใๆไผใฃใฆใใใฃใฆใใไบบใๅฏพ่ฑกใซ่ชฟๆปใใ็ตๆใใAIใฏใใใใใ่ชๅใฏใใใใชใใใจ่ชไฟกใใใใใๅใใใๅพๅใๅ ฑ้ใใฆใฟใใใพใใใ ใใใใใฎๅพใฎใไฝฟใๆนใๆฌก็ฌฌใงใ่ชไฟกใๅคฑใใใใพใพใฎไบบใจ่ชไฟกใใจใๆปใไบบใซๅใใใใใจใ็ขบ่ชใใใจๅ ฑๅใใใฆใใพใใ
Today marks 40 years since the Space Challenge disaster. 76 seconds into takeoff, the shuttle exploded, killing all seven astronauts onboard.
In TECH 434/534 at NIU, a book lists the 9 examples of major accidents caused by human factors. Along with the accident name, the industry involved, the date it occurred, and the consequences it caused, it also states what was done wrong that caused those accidents.
Was listening to one of the supernerds, he was framing this as "Every individual has multi-dimensional performance characteristics" and the skill lies in using those to work together.
So, you think you're super smart?
Well, you suck at engineering, project management, food prep, comforting they who fall behind.
Everyone is shit at something, and you are super shit at far more things than you're good at.