New documentary asks if we are doomed by AI
A deep cinematic look into the existential timeline. Featuring intense interviews with top global researchers and safety advocates, the project investigates whether accelerating corporate competition will irrevocably shatter safety alignment protocols before governance models can adapt.
#AIEthics #Documentary #TechPolicy #ExistentialRisk #AISafety #CinematicNews
https://www.technology-news-channel.com/new-documentary-asks-if-we-are-doomed-by-ai/
New documentary asks if we are doomed by AI

"The AI Doc: Or How I Became an Apocaloptimist" is a new documentary exploring the future of Artificial Intelligence and[...]

Technology News

Everything You’ve Been Told About Pre-History is Wrong

It’s the question that will come to define our lives: is our society going to collapse? But the field of collapse research is fragmented, chaotic, and often just plain deranged. Who can you trust?

Luke Kemp is the author of Goliath’s Curse and a Research Affiliate at the Cambridge University Centre for the Study of Existential Risk. And he’s also a political radical

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMrXbRuovY8

#prehistory #LukeKemp #research #ExistentialRisk

Everything You’ve Been Told About Pre-History is Wrong

YouTube

Novara Media | You Can’t Have Billionaires and Democracy. Ancient Collapse Proves It. by Novara Media

AI generated summary, Read the full article for complete information.

The new Novara Media series “Do Your Own Research” investigates whether modern societies are headed toward collapse, drawing parallels with past empires. Host Richard Hames talks with Luke Kemp—author of *Goliath’s Curse* and a research affiliate at Cambridge University’s Centre for the Study of Existential Risk—who warns that we are near the same tipping point that toppled earlier empires, describing states as criminal gangs in disguise and likening ancient Rome to a modern ISIS, while arguing that billionaire power undermines democracy; the show, featuring music by Iglooghost, was published on 25 April 2026.

Read more: https://novaramedia.com/2026/04/25/you-cant-have-billionaires-and-democracy-ancient-collapse-proves-it/

#RichardHames #LukeKemp #ExistentialRisk

You Can’t Have Billionaires and Democracy. Ancient Collapse Proves It.

Collapse is the most likely outcome.

Novara Media
I thought the Ronan Farrow/Andrew Marantz New Yorker article on OpenAI and Sam Altman in particular reveals many important details and helps settle several speculations (e.g. about what happened when Altman was briefly fired from OpenAI). The overall portrayal of Altman as frankly a compulsive liar is much needed.

However, like many Farrow and Marantz seem to take the so-called "existential risk" framing of AI seriously. I really wish people would stop doing that. In this case it makes the article feel incoherent in places.

This technology by itself does not pose a unique risk. It's the people, organizations, and governments around it, and their behavior with respect to it, that generate risk. Treating the technology alone as uniquely existentially risky provides cover for a wide variety of bad actors to both continue doing their work as well as to shrug and say "oops" if something goes catastrophically wrong or if smaller harms accumulate into intolerably large ones. The very framing provides an accountability shield, which by my read contradicts what Farrow himself suggests is needed, namely more accountability. I take this from this article, his previous work, and comments he makes in interviews (e.g., this one with Decoder.

We need to stop catastrophizing. It's thought and action terminating.

#AI #GenAI #GenerativeAI #OpenAI #SamAltman #RonanFarrow #AndrewMarantz #NewYorker #xrisk #ExistentialRisk #AISafety
Ronan Farrow on Sam Altman's strained relationship with the truth | Decoder

YouTube
Watch the OER Foundation's urgent take on AI's existential risks at UNESCO's 3rd World OER Congress. Must-see scenarios & a companion paper — essential for educators, policy makers, and open ed advocates. #OER #AI #AIethics #UNESCO #OpenEducation #Education #EdTech #ExistentialRisk #English
https://vid.fossdle.org/videos/watch/c695b13a-3507-46cb-9f63-908d30a568c4
OER's existential AI risks: OERF's Contribution to UNESCO 3rd World OER Congress

PeerTube

Who actually shapes global risk?

One common answer is to focus on individual apocalyptic actors, like terrorists aiming to end the world. But are these groups really what we should be on the lookout for most? Or should we not also consider institutional actors, like states, large militaries, or companies, who actually have the power and resources to meaningfully tip the global balance?

Find out more in post: https://existentialcrunch.substack.com/p/who-shapes-global-risk

#GlobalCatastrophicRisk #ExistentialRisk #Terrorism #Military

What if we create conscious systems without realizing it?Consciousness is no longer just philosophy. Scientists say it’s now central to ethics, AI safety, and human responsibility.
#Consciousness
#ExistentialRisk
#AIethics
#Neurotechnology
#Neuroscience
#CognitiveScience
https://www.scientificworldinfo.com/2026/02/why-scientists-are-rushing-to-understand-consciousness.html
Why Scientists Are Rushing to Understand Consciousness Right Now

Scientists Say Ignoring Consciousness Could Lead to Serious Ethical Risks Scientists say technology is moving faster than our ability to und...

Blogger

The Great Silence: The Fermi Paradox, the Great Filter, and the Fate of Humanity

🌌 If the universe is teeming with stars, where is everybody? The Fermi Paradox remains one of the greatest mysteries of science. Are we the first, the rare, or are we facing a "Great Filter" in our future? Explore the intersection of astrophysics and philosophy as we look for our place in the cosmic silence. #FermiParadox #GreatFilter #SpacePhilosophy #ExistentialRisk #TheBorealTimes

https://borealtimes.org/the-fermi-paradox/

The Great Silence: The Fermi Paradox, the Great Filter, and the Fate of Humanity - The Boreal Times

Why are we alone? Dive into the Fermi Paradox and the Great Filter. Analyze the scientific and philosophical implications of the "Great Silence" for our future.

Boreal Times

The Great Silence: The Fermi Paradox, the Great Filter, and the Fate of Humanity

The Fermi Paradox and the Great Filter

For as long as humans have looked at the night sky, we have asked the same question: “Are we alone?” In the mid-20th century, physicist Enrico Fermi famously formalized this curiosity into what we now call the Fermi Paradox. He noted that given the age of the universe (nearly 14 billion years) and the staggering number of stars and potentially habitable planets, it is statistically probable that intelligent civilizations should have emerged and colonized the galaxy by now. Yet, as of 2026, our most advanced telescopes and sensors have met nothing but an eerie, persistent silence.

This “Great Silence” is not just an astronomical puzzle; it is an existential mirror. To explain the lack of contact, scientists have proposed the “Great Filter” hypothesis—the idea that somewhere along the timeline from a single-cell organism to a galaxy-spanning civilization, there is a barrier so difficult to cross that it eliminates almost everyone who tries. The critical question for us in the 21st century is: Is the Filter behind us, or is it waiting in our future?

The Empirical Scale of the Mystery

To appreciate the paradox, one must look at the numbers. The Milky Way alone contains between 100 and 400 billion stars. Recent data from missions like Kepler and TESS suggest that nearly every star hosts at least one planet, and billions of these reside in the “habitable zone” where liquid water can exist.

If even a tiny fraction of these planets developed life, and a tiny fraction of that life became intelligent, there should be thousands of civilizations in our galaxy. Even with sub-light-speed travel, a civilization could colonize the entire Milky Way in a few tens of millions of years—a mere “blink” in cosmic time. Empirically, the galaxy should be teeming with radio signals, megastructures like Dyson Spheres, or at the very least, the chemical signatures of industrial activity. The fact that we see none of these suggests that a “Filter” is at work.

The Filter in the Rearview Mirror: Are We the Lucky Ones?

The most optimistic resolution to the paradox is that the Great Filter lies in our evolutionary past. This theory suggests that the transition from simple life to complex, technological intelligence is far more difficult than we imagine.

Several potential “filters” have been identified in Earth’s history:

  • Abiogenesis: The spark of life itself might be a fluke of chemistry that happens only once in a billion galaxies.
  • The Prokaryote-Eukaryote Jump: On Earth, it took two billion years for simple cells to develop a nucleus and complex structures. This suggests that complex life might be an extremely improbable “bottleneck.”
  • Technological Intelligence: While many species on Earth are “smart,” only one has developed the ability to use fire, mathematics, and radio waves.

If the Filter is behind us, it means humanity is a “cosmic outlier”—a rare exception that has managed to navigate a series of impossible odds. In this view, we have a profound responsibility to survive, as we may be the only consciousness the universe has ever produced.

The Filter Ahead: The Precipice of Self-Destruction

The more sobering possibility is that the Great Filter lies in our future. This suggests that civilizations tend to reach our current level of technological development but then succumb to an “existential catastrophe” before they can become multi-planetary.

In 2026, we are staring at several “anthropogenic” (human-caused) risks that could act as our own Filter:

  • Unchecked Artificial Intelligence: The risk of a “superintelligence” whose goals are not aligned with human survival.
  • Climate Collapse and Resource Depletion: A civilization might exhaust its planet’s energy and ecological capacity before it has the technology to leave.
  • Nuclear or Biological Warfare: As technology advances, the power to destroy an entire species becomes accessible to smaller and smaller groups.

The “Great Filter” in the future acts as a structural barrier. It implies that there is a “technological trap” where the power of our tools outpaces our social and ethical wisdom. This connects deeply with the Oslo Meet philosophy: the need to unite solutions and experiences to navigate the complexities of our shared future.

Astrosociology and the Dark Forest

Another perspective emerging in 2026 is “Astrosociology”—the study of how extraterrestrial societies might behave. Some theorists suggest that the silence is not due to the absence of life, but due to a deliberate choice.

The Dark Forest Theory (popularized by Liu Cixin) suggests that the universe is a place of predator and prey. In this scenario, any civilization that reveals its location is immediately viewed as a threat by others and eliminated. Therefore, the “smart” civilizations stay quiet. While this is speculative, it provides an empirical framework for why we might see plenty of habitable planets but no signals: the cost of being “loud” in the cosmos might be extinction.

Why This Matters: The Ethics of Survival

The Fermi Paradox is more than a scientific debate; it is a call to action. If the Great Filter is a real phenomenon, then humanity is currently at its most dangerous phase of development. We have developed the “bones and clubs” of the nuclear and digital age, but we have not yet established the “safety nets” required to survive them.

Studying the Great Filter forces us to prioritize Longtermism—the ethical view that protecting the future of humanity is our most important task today. Every effort to reduce light pollution, protect our orbital environment, or build sustainable economies on Earth is, in a sense, an attempt to “push back” against the Filter.

The Stewardship of the Light

The “Great Silence” is not a reason for despair, but for a renewed sense of purpose. Whether we are the first, the only, or one of many survivors, our position in the universe is unique. We are the only species we know of that can contemplate the paradox and work to overcome it.

As we continue to build our home observatories and search for exoplanets with IA, we are not just looking for “aliens.” We are looking for a reflection of our own potential. By solving the challenges of sustainability and peace on Earth, we are proving that a civilization can pass through the Filter. The sky may be silent for now, but that silence gives us the room to write our own story—a story that, hopefully, will one day be heard across the stars.

References and Empirical Studies

👉 Share your thoughts in the comments, and explore more insights on our Journal and Magazine. Please consider becoming a subscriber, thank you: https://borealtimes.org/subscriptions – Follow The Boreal Times on social media. Join the Oslo Meet by connecting experiences and uniting solutions: https://oslomeet.org

#Astrosociology #CosmicSilence #ExistentialRisk #FermiParadox #GreatFilterTheory