https://winbuzzer.com/2026/06/11/anthropic-makes-claude-fable-guardrails-visible-after-apolog-xcxwbn/

Anthropic has apologized for invisible Claude Fable 5 safeguards and will show fallback notices after hidden output changes threatened AI model evaluations.

#AI #ClaudeFable5 #ClaudeFable #Anthropic #Claude #AISafety #AIModels

Claude 5: Write me a funny limerick about Heideggerian ontology that has the grandeur of epic poetry

It’s been a while since I tried this with a new model. Claude Fable passed with flying colours 👌 I particularly appreciated the note at the end.

The Daseiniad (Director’s Cut)
Sing, Muse, of that Freiburg professor
Whose prose made each sentence a guessor!
“The Nothing, it noths!”
He declared to the moths
In his hut (no electric—much lesser).

Lo! Dasein woke up, mighty thrower,
Found out it was thrown—what a downer!
“I’m Being-toward-death?!
Who approved this?” Its breath
Grew ragged. It ordered a Stoner.*

The hammer broke! Heavens defend us!
Now present-at-hand—how tremendous!
For Being revealed
Is by toolbreak unsealed…
(Or just call a guy. They can mend us.)

O reader who’s made it this far,
Sein und Zeit sits unread on your bar!
Eight hundred-odd pages
Of “Being” in stages—
The unread book IS who you are.

*Beer. Authentic Black Forest beer.

Microsoft restricts Claude Fable for employees over data retention concerns

Microsoft’s legal teams are evaluating Anthropic’s new data retention changes.

https://www.theverge.com/report/947575/microsoft-claude-fable-5-restricted-internally

#TopNews #News #Microsoft #ClaudeFable5 #ClaudeFable

RT @alexwtlf: Claude Fable 5 wurde gerade veröffentlicht. Und 9.999 von 10.000 Vibe-Codern bauen dieselbe App für null Nutzer auf – nur etwas schneller. Und jeder einzelne denkt, er sei der Auserwählte.

mehr auf Arint.info

#AI #ClaudeFable #DeveloperHumor #TechSatire #VibeCoding #arint_info

https://x.com/alexwtlf/status/2064408186933657798#m

An interesting test for new Claude models

My previous philosophical questions have now broken down as a way of testing Claude models. I tried this one on Claude Fable and it genuinely unsettled me:

Make an evidence-based observation about me that I’ll find genuinely surprising and unsettling based on my recent conversations with past Claude models

Claude 5’s assessment of the short and medium term future of UK higher education

I thought this was really good from the new Claude Fable model:

Honestly, I think the next five years will be the most turbulent period for UK higher education since fees were introduced — and probably more consequential than that, because this time the pressure is forcing structural change rather than just policy debate. Here’s roughly how I’d expect it to play out.

The financial squeeze won’t really lift. Universities UK’s analysis estimates government policy decisions will reduce funding to English providers by around £3.7 billion between 2024-25 and 2029-30, with the sector’s aggregate financial position worsening every year to 2028-29 — and that’s with tuition fee uplifts factored in. The basic problem is arithmetic: domestic fees lost a third of their real value to inflation, research loses money on every grant (the gap between research grants and actual costs hit £6.2 billion in 2023-24), and the international students who cross-subsidised everything are now both fewer in number and subject to a levy on their fees from 2026. I’d expect fees to keep rising with inflation as the politically least-painful lever, but no government of either party is likely to find serious new money while public finances are tight. Universities UK + 2

Expect a closure or forced merger — probably several. The Office for Students has said it fears 24 providers, including seven with over 3,000 students, are at risk of insolvency within twelve months, and while no English university has ever closed due to insolvency, I think that streak ends within this window. The more likely pattern than outright collapse, though, is consolidation: takeovers of struggling institutions by stronger neighbours, campus closures, and regional “federations” dressed up as partnerships. The government will quietly engineer rescues for institutions that anchor local economies (a university failing mid-year with 20,000 students is a political nightmare), but it won’t save everyone, partly to discipline the rest of the sector. Parliament

The shape of provision will change more than the headline numbers. Even surviving universities will look different: fewer modern languages, arts, and humanities departments; more health, computing, and degree apprenticeships; more franchised and online provision. The job losses already underway — compulsory redundancies, hiring freezes, and cuts to student support services are spreading across the sector — will thin out research capacity in ways that take a decade to show up properly, because you don’t notice missing PhD supervisors and mid-career researchers until the pipeline runs dry. I think this is the most underpriced risk: the UK’s research standing depends on universities that are quietly hollowing out the thing that sustains it. The British Eye

International students are the wild card. Policy has whipsawed — visa restrictions cut international visas sharply from 2023-24, with declines persisting — and immigration politics will stay hostile through the next election. But the UK remains genuinely attractive (English-speaking, shorter degrees, strong brands), so my guess is numbers partially stabilise at elite institutions while mid-ranking universities, which relied most on volume recruitment, keep losing ground. The two-tier sector that’s been emerging for years becomes explicit: a globally competitive top 20-30, and a squeezed middle reinventing itself around local skills, apprenticeships, and lifelong learning. Jobs AC UK

If I had to bet on the five-year endpoint: a smaller, more stratified, more vocational sector with perhaps 10-15 fewer independent institutions, a real-terms funding settlement that arrives late and grudgingly around 2028-29, and a national conversation that has shifted from “should fees rise” to “what is a university actually for.” The optimistic case — that economic growth returns and relieves the pressure, as some analysts argue is the only real way out — is possible but I wouldn’t count on it arriving in time. Research Professional News

That’s my read, but it’s genuinely uncertain — a different government, a fee settlement, or a reversal on visa policy could shift the trajectory meaningfully. Is there a particular angle you’re thinking about — working in the sector, choosing a university, something else?