Read an article (which, alas I cannot find) which made an interesting comparison between Australian and US attitudes towards success and history. History isn't quite the right word but... storytelling of events of recent history, perhaps. The US, he said, treats everything as a performance - it must be perfect, it must be shiny, it must be dramatic, it must be inspirational; it must be retold to highlight the glory of the heroes (and one must obfuscate or suppress those stories where there are no heroes). Australia, by contrast, is pragmatic in its stories; history is a source of lessons to remember, not legends to aspire to. Laugh at your failures (and remember what didn't work), play down your successes (because what worked is more important than who did it). That's why we remember and laugh at the Emu Wars; why we celebrate a defeat (Gallipoli), why we prefer down-to-earth effectiveness over polished prettiness.
Some of the anecdotes related... a guy who told of falling asleep on a country train, woke up to find he'd missed his stop by 300 kilometres, got off, bought some lunch, caught the next train back.
The American was expecting some dramatic punchline, and asked the Aussie "Why didn't you complain?"
The Aussie looked at him blankly. "It wasn't the train's fault I missed the stop."
This explains so much.



