@randomwizard @lkh @mhd @FrankBlack78 I wonder if there's a way to configure Open Street Map (e.g. via OsmAnd) such that it produces a map without streets, without buildings, etc.

@yora I was a huge fan of it!

@yora Here in Switzerland the people even vote against tax increases for the rich. 😓

@Sandra As far as I understand this Magic the Gathering lesson 13, I disagree with it. It is absolutely the task of the players to find joy in the collaborative activity of playing the game. I am not the only entertainer at the table, I am the referee and we hopefully entertain each other. If the players want to discuss philosophy with patrons at the guest house I might speak a few sentences in direct speech, then summarise a point or two as far as it relates to the game at hand, and then I might ask directly: Where do you want to go from here? There is no more game-related information to be had, they told you all they know. At that point I'm refusing to make something fun that isn't part of the game, from my point of view. It is the player's job to pick a course of action that is the right kind of challenging. If they go to level 3 of the dungeon with their level 10 characters, it's interesting for a session or two but then I might ask them: Are you sure? This is probably not interesting anymore. Let's leave this to expeditions with low-level characters. To me, being able to make these choices, and sometimes make the wrong choice, is all part of the freedom of action that I enjoy. I suspect that Magic the Gathering lesson 13 is for game designers, not referees. If D&D is about combat, for example, D&D combat should be fun, I agree with that. But I doubt the lesson applies to me running adventure games.