Full open access coming soon, if you experience access issues please contact me directly.
#edutoot #education #eduresearch #stem # engineeringeducation @OtwartaNauka @openscience @edutooters
| Google Scholar | https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=wqHFlV4AAAAJ&hl=en |
| ORCiD | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9082-7380 |
| Media | https://www.rte.ie/author/948763-jason-power/ |
Our concluding chapter in the International Handbook of Engineering Education Research is out now and #openaccess : https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-edit/10.4324/9781003287483/international-handbook-engineering-education-research-aditya-johri?_ga=427718455.1688221894&_gl=1*182t6r6*_ga*NDI3NzE4NDU1LjE2ODgyMjE4OTQ.*_ga_0HYE8YG0M6*MTY4ODIyMTg5Ni4xLjAuMTY4ODIyMTg5Ni4wLjAuMA
#edutoot #education #eduresearch #stem # engineeringeducation @OtwartaNauka @openscience @edutooters
In this paper we look at the benefits and drawbacks of peer/self assessment when used by university engineering students. We examine the benefits and drawbacks of this strategy, as well as ways to optimise its use.
#edutoot #education #eduresearch #stem # engineeringeducation @OtwartaNauka @openscience @edutooters
Check out my new article with RTE looking at how EV batteries can support the national grid and may soon be able to save, or even earn, money when parked at home
https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2023/0301/1359581-electric-cars-vehicles-home-load-grid-v2h-v2l-v2g/
We are seeking an EU partner for an Erasmus Capacity Building grant application. Ideally with experience of professional development for university level STEM educators. Funding would be workpackage based (100-200k) over 4 years. DM any questions
#edutoot #education #eduresearch @OtwartaNauka @openscience @edutooters
In this article I consider the drive for efficency within EV design and manufacture
In this paper we examine changes in student teacher beliefs around #onlinelearning as they engage in the medium for the first time. DM or email if you experience acces issues.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2022.2061565
#edutoot #education #eduresearch @OtwartaNauka @openscience @edutooters
Framed from a socio-cognitive perspective, and the contemporary increased salience of digital learning readiness and competence, the purpose of this study was two-fold: to validate Online Learner R...
Incentives for academics have become increasingly perverse over the last 50 years, according to this 2017 article by Edwards and Roy
The table below neatly summarizes their key findings ⬇️
Expanding the talent pipeline of students from underrepresented backgrounds in STEM has been a priority in the United States for decades. However, potential solutions to increase the number of such students in STEM academic pathways, measured using longitudinal randomized controlled trials in real-world contexts, have been limited. Here, we expand on an earlier investigation that reported results from a longitudinal field experiment in which undergraduate female students (N = 150) interested in engineering at college entry were randomly assigned a female peer mentor in engineering, a male peer mentor in engineering, or not assigned a mentor for their first year of college. While an earlier article presented findings from participants’ first two years of college, the current article reports the same participants’ academic experiences for each year in college through college graduation and one year post-graduation. Compared to the male peer mentor and no mentor condition, having a female peer mentor was associated with a significant improvement in participants’ psychological experiences in engineering, aspirations to pursue postgraduate engineering degrees, and emotional well-being. It was also associated with participants’ success in securing engineering internships and retention in STEM majors through college graduation. In sum, a low-cost, short peer mentoring intervention demonstrates benefits in promoting female students’ success in engineering from college entry, through one-year post-graduation. The authors report findings from their study of female student participants interested in engineering at college entry who were randomly assigned to a female peer mentor, male mentor, or no mentor for their first year of college. The authors show that students assigned to a female peer mentor show benefits in psychological experiences in engineering, aspirations to pursue postgraduate engineering degrees, and emotional well-being, which persists up to one year after graduation.