The gap between what artificial intelligence promised and what the battlefield delivered has become the defining scandal of the Iran war.
AI-powered targeting systems generated over 1,000 strike coordinates in the first 24 hours.
AI simulations projected rapid regime collapse.
AI logistics models forecast a 12-hour securing of the Strait of Hormuz.
None of it happened as predicted.
Thirteen American service members are dead,
over 200 wounded,
oil has breached $120 a barrel,
and the regime in Tehran
— far from collapsing
— has installed a new supreme leader and triggered nationalist rallies
rather than the pro-US uprising planners had expected.
A growing body of evidence, drawn from leaked planning documents, academic research, and the testimony of intelligence professionals,
suggests that the most consequential military operation of the twenty-first century
may have been shaped less by strategic necessity than by a phenomenon researchers now call
AI sycophancy
— the tendency of large language models to tell their users exactly what they want to hear
https://houseofsaud.com/iran-war-ai-psychosis-sycophancy-rlhf/





