Hannah Clover

@HannahClover
277 Followers
171 Following
860 Posts
Hi, I'm Hannah Clover :) I like editing Wikipedia, running, nature photographs, knitting, and playing video games. I think the world would be a better place if we were all much kinder to one another.
WikipedianUser:Clovermoss
WOTYhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedian_of_the_Year
Microsoft Copilot terms of service have been updated to include this gem: "Copilot is for entertainment purposes only." https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/02/copilot_terms_of_service/
Even Microsoft knows Copilot shouldn't be trusted with anything important

: Terms admit it is for entertainment only and may get things wrong

The Register
why is baby globe dancing and wearing a party hat on the good friday article lmao
When someone says ā€žScientists do not want you to knowā€œ you can dismiss everything from there on. Scientists want you to know. They are desperate that you know. They can’t shut up about what they found out and want you to know.

"Research shows that the less you know about AI, the more likely you are to use it."

https://wapo.st/4luy1qI

Schools are teaching AI — and making a massive mistake

They should teach kids to have agency over the technology, not just how to use it.

The Washington Post

Want to improve book info on Wikimedia? Join #EveryBookItsReader 2026

Every Book Its Reader is a campaign to incentivise everyone to improve quality content about books through Wikipedia, Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikibooks, and Wikisource. It usually runs through the whole month of April. You can go to the campaign website and follow the instructions to link your Wikimedia account to the campaign and thus have your contributions counted.

This means you can create a new Wikipedia page for an author or book that doesn’t exist yet or, if you want to start with a less demanding task, you can search for Wikipedia articles about your favourite authors or books, read them and add information or add references for the information already published. You can also contribute to the other platforms of Wikimedia, like the Commons, the Wikibooks, or Wikisource (if you’re uploading an item, be sure to check if you have the copyright of the work or if it’s in public domain).

Another more easy option is to contribute to Wikidata (at least for me), a wiki of structured data. This means that once the data is there, you can ask (create queries) about what you want to know. Some examples:

You can also use the more easy visual query builder here. But to ask questions, we need the data there.

This year I thought I would add information about Elizabeth Fair books to Wikidata. There’s already an item for the author, but not her books. I started by creating an item for the work Bramton Wick, published in 1952. But I also wanted to add the 2017 edition by Dean Street Press, so I added a new item for that edition (one work can have several editions). And I wanted to describe it as much as possible: that it was published by DSP (there was not info about it, so I created a new item for the publisher), in the Furrowed Middlebrow collection (for which I also created an item) with an introduction by Elizabeth Crawford (that was already on Wikidata, so I linked to it directly). At the end, I went to the item about Elizabeth Fair, that was already on Wikidata, and was able to link Bramton Wick to her notable works. I’m linking here all the items to Wikidata, so if you have more info, you can go there and add to them.

So I’m hoping to find some time during this month to add at least Fair’s other books (yeah, I know you can tell I love her books šŸ˜).

In the 2024 campaign, I added to Wikidata information about (autolink, in Portuguese) titles to Agatha Christie’s books to solve a problem I (and probably many others that read in more than one language) face: the fact the same book can have very different titles, which means that you can find what it seems a new to you book by a given author, but it just has a different title of a book you already own or read.

Steven from @christie_in_translation at Instagram shares regularly different countries’ editions of Agatha Christie’s books and reflects about the different translations of her titles. In Christie’s case, we even have the same book in the same language (English) with a different title, depending if it was published in the UK or the US.

So this year I decided to extend it to new authors and I’m using a Portuguese collection of crime fiction (Colecção Vampiro) to add the Portuguese titles to the original items’ titles in Wikidata.

As you can see, you can go from simple to more complex contributions to the Every Book Its Reader, and each one is as much important as the other. So, why not give it a go?

#AgathaChristie #books #ColecçãoVampiro #CrimeFiction #DeanStreetPress #ElizabethFair #EveryBookItsReader #fiction #FurrowedMiddlebrow #Metadata #reading #Technology #Wikidata #Wikimedia
If anyone was curious what is going through my head when I'm creating an article, I made a YouTube video from start to finish showing that process: https://youtu.be/vSduOU0ftzg (I'll emphasize this is a walkthrough and not a guide, although I do explain what I'm doing as I'm doing it). #wikipedia #tech
Watch me create an article on Wikipedia

YouTube

"Does a defendant who used an AI translator retain attorney-client privilege?

Not according to a recent decision from a judge in the Southern District of New York. On Feb. 17, Judge Jed Rakoff issued a written opinion in United States v. Heppner. This first-of-its-kind ruling found that documents created by a criminal defendant using Claude are not protected by attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine."

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/ai-and-privilege-after-united-states-v.-heppner

AI and Privilege After United States v. Heppner

A recent flawed ruling on privilege threatens the access to legal services that AI tools can provide.

Default

new favourite Wikimedia Commons category: ā€œImproper electrical wiringā€

I beg you, PLEASE, contribute photos of the abominations you have encountered to this Commonscat :D

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Improper_electrical_wiring

Category:Improper electrical wiring - Wikimedia Commons

I've said it before, but this kind of journalism only made sense in an era where it was important to document what powerful people said because people might not be able to find it any other way Now? If you're not fact-checking or contextualizing comments like this, you are just doing free PR

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:xtg6uhgsy2j7k2a6qtcood2w/post/3miby2kohf22g
The visuals in this make me swoon. The idea of building my own bookcases sounds amazing: https://youtube.com/shorts/m-CHmbXVQQw
So am I a carpenter now? 🤣 #diyfurniture #diy

YouTube