@jaklumen @Tdorey @actualham @Dan_Blick @fgraver @Autumm I feel we don't talk nearly enough about introversion in networks. I'm the same. My head fills up and I stop thinking. @mahabali has thought about this a bit too.

So I'm really interested in what makes a network hospitable to both introverts and extroverts by design?

@katebowles @jaklumen @Tdorey @actualham @Dan_Blick @fgraver @Autumm
I was thinking about this.
A. What makes any space hospitable for both intro/extroverts?
B. I assume it is not a binary of course but asking ppl at both extremes to share their good/bad experiences and aspirations might be an interesting research project to pursue.
C. I think Autumm was interested in this topic awhile ago.
D. Is introversion a stable preference or contextual one? (and extroversion?)
@mahabali @Tdorey @katebowles @actualham @fgraver @Autumm @jaklumen I love this question. I hope to come back to this with a thoughtful response soon. I'm very interested in this topic.

@Dan_Blick @mahabali @Tdorey @katebowles @actualham @Autumm @jaklumen These are interesting questions. I'm an introvert, fairly shy, and quite familiar with "impostor syndrome". I've learned to live with all these things, but they combine to make me avoid social gatherings with people I don't know well.

Online is different. I can jump in here in a way I would never dream of irl.

@fgraver @Dan_Blick @mahabali @Tdorey @katebowles @actualham @Autumm @jaklumen I find it interesting that sometimes people feel more comfortable online than irl, that those who are more introverted irl might be more extroverted online. I have this tendency myself, and really grabbed onto some open online spaces like a course called #etmooc (where I met @fgraver & @Patlockley) b/c I was able to communicate so much more deeply online than I would ever do w/strangers in person. Why might that be?
@clhendricksbc @Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @actualham @fgraver @Autumm @Patlockley @jaklumen I have found this to be true in myself and some others and I don't have a great idea why (beyond @Patlockley's cheeky/probably correct explanation, anyway). Part of it is surely (for me) my great comfort with expressing myself intentionally and completely, in writing, when I've had sufficient processing/revision/time to do so. As an aside, I've moved from 140 chars to 500 and may yet blog (again). :)
@Dan_Blick @Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @actualham @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen people think i am a bit ferocious online and i put that down to vernaculars i grew up in and now i suspect like txtspk and emoji we've got new ones. There is also much more.scope to be silent online and not be rude
@Patlockley @Tdorey @katebowles @actualham @Dan_Blick @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen i am pretty scared of u online, Pat, as I feel if i say anything that is not 100% thought out i may get strongly critiqued. This is not because you are really scary, it is probably on me. And i do not think u ever did anything to me...but i feel like i don't understand most of what ur saying and why because I lack context rather than because it is ferocious. Dunno if that makes sense
I'm trying to imagine @mahabali scared of anything and it's not working. :) @Tdorey @katebowles @actualham @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen

@Dan_Blick @mahabali @Tdorey @katebowles @actualham @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen Having met Pat in person I can vouch that he is as far from scary as you can get (sorry for blowing your cover).

I like that online the mirrors of our selves can have all kinds of curvatures of distortion. We say identity like its a fixed quantity. A student once described for her it was an iris (as in opening) that we change its dimensions in different contexts.

@cogdog @Dan_Blick @mahabali @Tdorey @actualham @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen I find I'm not usually surprised by meeting people offline, beyond "oh, taller than I thought you'd be", or the reverse. I like learning the sound of someone's accent, the pitch of their voice.
@katebowles @cogdog @Dan_Blick @mahabali @Tdorey @actualham @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen after knowing someone well via skype for a year, when we met in person I was greeted with - oh, so you do have feet ;)
@lauraritchie @katebowles @cogdog @Dan_Blick @mahabali @Tdorey @actualham @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen FEET? I'm still getting over that people have voices and faces...
@fgraver @Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen what if there was a 'room' where you could be a talking head, ephemeral, don't know how you could or if you would want to log it, extension of the coffee house metaphor, but exploring a different medium than typing? ...just daydreaming here...
@lauraritchie @fgraver @Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen google had a 3d chat room thing for a week or two. Perhaps social media needs a people who are here box?
@Patlockley @fgraver @Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen I had idea while ago. Wanted to call it sofa 2 stage + would be a repository of different images & places & idea was w/ simple VR headset + 3D camera (I got ThetaS) could develop progressive experiences for ppl to talk, play, perform... & would be great in school. Company got interested & I got worried. Didn't have time to learn code. Someone should develop as open ed resource... :)
@Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen (part 2) I have loads of images & idea is that it would also have the pedagogical framework to go with it - about performance coaching/learning,. I'd love to do it.... just need the tech side. *sigh*
@lauraritchie @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen I'd love to hear more about this ideas. I'be got visions of folks dropping in leaving something & some else finding it (not sure that's at all what you have in mind)

@Tdorey @lauraritchie @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen This was my experience of federated wiki -- the asynchronous leaving and finding of tiny idea notes. I was really compelled by this, enough to struggle with the functions given my poor tech skills.

I think it's something to consider here. A slow-moving makerspace of ideas.

Studio.

@Tdorey @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @Patlockley @jaklumen This is really a reply to @clhendricksbc about branching paths. On a laptop, I like that every new thought in this conversation jumps right back to @actualham's original comment about stepping away and coming back.

It feels as though mastodon comes with a longer memory for a thread once you find it; but harder to find it.

@katebowles @Tdorey @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @Patlockley @jaklumen That's true, Kate--it does go back there. But I also find that sometimes you get onto a thread and think you're seeing all the replies but actually there are whole other branches you're missing that you might stumble upon sometimes by accident. wouldn't it be cool if there were a way to image those somehow, graphically, & follow them out?

@clhendricksbc @Tdorey @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @Patlockley @jaklumen This is *exactly* the question I went over and over with federated wiki.

If I wrote something, and someone forked it, but then someone else forked it, the branching paths could never find each other again. And after a while I found myself grieving these lost connections.

Is there a way to map the garden of branching paths?

@katebowles @clhendricksbc @Tdorey @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @jaklumen The Hendricks and i discussed a wordpress plugin to bring threading to posts - mostly as an OER revision tracker - but could do this easy enough to code
@Patlockley @katebowles @Tdorey @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @jaklumen Cool--I'm now a "the"! :) I guess I keep having similar thoughts over the years, as I'm hoping we can do something like that again.
@clhendricksbc @katebowles @Tdorey @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @jaklumen it'd be easy to do, but not building stuff these days without definite users

@katebowles @Patlockley Yes please. Me too. And also - what do you mean by definite users?

@clhendricksbc @Tdorey @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @Autumm @jaklumen

@fgraver @Tdorey @katebowles @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen me 3. I leave Mastodon for 1.5 days (??) and y'all have revolutionized threading and stuff! Sorry i am responding to things all over the place right now. If i had multiple such threads going i would go nuts. Need to check timeline to see if i missed some stuff!

@fgraver @katebowles @clhendricksbc @Tdorey @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @Autumm @jaklumen I have built a lot of stuff based on "demand", but once done "demand" seems "less"* than "expected"**

* 0
** 1

@Patlockley Aha! So you need a contract written in something other than binary.
@fgraver more it is disheartening to build stuff and watch it die. Guess capitalism makes us want but doesn't make us do

@Patlockley There is that. Capitalism provides the treat and the bell, but never asks what's the point of making the dog drool. After all, once Pavlov achieved that he moved on to other things. The poor dog, on the other hand, was left with an embarrasing, involuntary habit...

We are trained to want shiny, new toys.

@katebowles @clhendricksbc @Tdorey @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @jaklumen also, why go for threads when you could lattice? Or Mesh? Why can't the same toot be a reply to the different toots.

@Patlockley Now you're talking. I think the main need is for some way to navigate the mesh, so you can follow a conversation, but also tie different strands back together if necessary.

@katebowles @clhendricksbc @Tdorey @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @Autumm @jaklumen

@fgraver @Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen perhaps, but once a mesh exists then what constitutes a link between elements. Could you mesh just on replies - or could you mesh on toots with the same link, or same picture or same hashtag?

@Patlockley My first thought is just on replies. Seems to be the most basic level.

@Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen

@fgraver @Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen yeah, but why base that as primary, i think you get to reinterpret if we debase a little

@Patlockley For me, the conversation is the key; thus the interesting thing is following the replies and threads of thought. Keep in mind I know nothing (to my shame) about the code that makes these things work and what is preferable on a technical level.

@Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen

@fgraver @Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen it isn't a code level, am trying to be agnostic as to what a conversation is
@Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen guess a bit like federalism here - is talking about the same link one conversation or n conversations about 1 thing

@Patlockley Ok, I think I get it. For me, it's about the replies. No matter how many voices, as long as people keep replying to the last comment, there's a thread. My experience is many online discussions are only one thread, but in cases like this one we're all in here, there are many and we need a way to navigate them all in order to follow the narrative, and perhaps tie some together.

@Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen

@Patlockley Which I suppose means the answer to your question is "yes". It's both one complex conversation and several related conversations. Not sure what that means for creating a method of navigation.

@Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen

@fgraver @Patlockley @Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen I feel some responsibility lies with each of us as we post. Otherwise it will be near impossible to deduce content/topics and branches as we go. At the moment, branches seem to be 'labelled' by the @ list, instead of by topic. What if we did both? That way either an algorithm or active person could begin to sort? #WonderingOutLoud

@lauraritchie I've been wondering about labelling too. I thought perhaps hashtags could help? But it's hard to say; could anyone have predicted that the original post by @actualham would have led to this wonderful chaos of a conversation?

@Patlockley @Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @Dan_Blick @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen

@fgraver @Tdorey @katebowles @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen interesting point about hashtags being a priori setting expectations of what a thread might be about.
@mahabali @Tdorey @katebowles @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen hashtags don't work (for me) if there is federation as why not fire up a mastadon just for that conf or that area?

This is a very intending idea @Patlockley. It's not now but I think with some (serious) testing and configuration (and hi-strength duct tape) this or something like it could be spun up on demand just like a WordPress instance can be. Is that want you are thinking?

@mahabali @Tdorey @katebowles @cogdog @actualham @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen

@Dan_Blick @Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen adding @blamb to ask what he thinks of all this? (if you have time to check the back log of the conversation?)

@lauraritchie @Dan_Blick @Tdorey @katebowles @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen I certainly don't want to pass up an invite to what has been a fascinating dinner party. Sadly, I don't have a lot of substance to add on questions of hosting, threading (latticing or meshing) etc... It is fun to think on.

I've also noticed how the discussion history changes based on entry point. Which would annoy me normally, but here seems to add a shambling charm.

@blamb @lauraritchie @Dan_Blick @Tdorey @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen

It's a maze, that every time you start over can take you a different route, or not. Shambling charm, improv, narrative remix, it's all there. I keep finding breakout detours that I didn't know were there.

Thinking: what this has been quietly doing all along is thickening up my understanding of things. Learning by retracking.

@Patlockley @mahabali @Tdorey @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen Did you read @Triplefox proposal on rooms?

I lack the tech; I only grasp the spatial metaphors. I understand a room to be a pop-up space within a federated instance. So it would seem kind of perfect for short-duration events.

@katebowles @Patlockley @mahabali @Tdorey @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen @Triplefox for seeing convos, I'd love to have a visualisation like this (see vid at 24 sec.) https://lifehacker.com/5901674/collusion-for-chrome-shows-you-where-your-personal-data-is-going-on-the-web-as-you-browse programme doesn't work any more, but was like moveable trees & you could look through the branches. ...if coding was not an issue, it would be epic :)
@lauraritchie @katebowles @Patlockley @mahabali @Tdorey @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @fgraver @Autumm @jaklumen @Triplefox Yes, this was the kind of thing I was thinking when I was visualizing branching discussions.

@clhendricksbc @lauraritchie Tha looks a little like Pearltrees before they switched over to tiles (and I stopped using it). It was a fantastic tool for organizing information in a visual way.

@katebowles @Patlockley @mahabali @Tdorey @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @Autumm @jaklumen @Triplefox

@katebowles i like @Triplefox rooms concept but i have a feeling thw potential of self-hosting a network is something more and worth imagining and experimenting with. There can be different functionalities for diff instances (open source so u can pick n choose or code ur own things)
@Tdorey @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen
@mahabali @katebowles @Tdorey @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen
The major limiting factors on self-hosting are setup friction, resource limits and ability to deal with problems like attackers(spam, denial of service, etc.). Email demonstrated all are survivable, but also that most people preference towards great ux over other factors and will go for something like gmail. For social networking, bandwidth and storage also an issue.

@Triplefox oh no. Now I am thinking about how come we just accept that our email isn't technically our own or within our control (I mean i have thought about it, but now thinking more about why we accept that certain things are just how internet works. Renewing domaim registration annually, email on someone else's terms...)

@Tdorey @katebowles @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen

@Patlockley @Tdorey @katebowles @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @clhendricksbc @jaklumen yep. I was talking earlier of using Mastodon instances for events like confs or moocs or such. Cogdog says he was considering but we hear from @timmmmyboy that this is not a simple setup, yeah?
@fgraver @Tdorey @katebowles @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @Autumm @clhendricksbc @Patlockley @jaklumen this seems like we r going back to old-school threaded discussion, only with tagging people on

@Patlockley @katebowles @clhendricksbc @mahabali @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @jaklumen THIS is whY I want to try to manually map this wonderful thread. Things are spinning off & then converging again. It's not just about who is replying to whom but also the topics they are discussing.

I've got a fuzzy idea just beyond what I can completely conceive. Might need to take a day off to work on it...

@katebowles @Patlockley @clhendricksbc @Tdorey @cogdog @actualham @Dan_Blick @lauraritchie @fgraver @Autumm @jaklumen

This blogpost I wrote is tangentially related to our Mastodon discussions. I cant remember which thread (!?!) but might as well be this one since it is the active one these days

https://t.co/I8ipW9vStD