Four Palestine Action activists have been sentenced not on the basis of the convictions for criminal damage (through a jury trial) but on the basis their crime *really* was terrorism (a subsequent decision by the presiding judge).

This not only violates the sanctity of jury trials (the jury was not informed of this possibility), it also is a retrospective legal decision, essentially violating the Rule of Law.

Its a direct attack on civil liberties!

#politics #protest
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce950111xk7o

Palestine Action activists jailed over Bristol Elbit factory raid

The case is believed to be the first time that convictions for criminal damage have been classified as terrorism.

BBC News
@ChrisMayLA6
I don't understand how this is legal, it's certainly not moral. Surely justice can only be served if in possession of ALL the facts?

@Sarahw

Under section 69 of the Sentencing Act the Judge can use their discretion to declare a crime was intended to influence the Govt. and was *actually* terrorism; its doing exactly what it was intended to do; allow a judge to sentence on the basis of an accusation of terrorism that would've been unlikely to have been sustained by a jury (who would might well acquit on that basis)... so an attack on jury's powers of decision & an attack on the norm against retrospective legal findings

@ChrisMayLA6
“Intended to influence the Government” seems like a dangerously low bar. Will spraying political graffiti count as terrorism in future trials, for example?

@KimSJ

Indeed, it does; and essentially makes all protest potentially terrorism.... which even if it was not intended to be so broad, can so easily be interpreted in that way, its a wonder that its taken this long for it to come to pass.

@KimSJ @ChrisMayLA6 I think it already has in the case of those who sprayed an aircraft.....
@KimSJ @ChrisMayLA6
"If voting could change anything"

@ChrisMayLA6 @Sarahw

The hired gun problem, you give them a brief, they do their professional best with it, but zero requirement for them to engage with it on a personal level, just an intellectual one.

@ChrisMayLA6 @Sarahw I wonder what the European courts will say when it gets there.
@TimWardCam @ChrisMayLA6 @Sarahw “we, too, are zionist pederasts,” most likely
@ChrisMayLA6
"The judge said their actions had aimed to influence the government."
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
@Havoc_online @ChrisMayLA6 We're entitled to influence the government, at least as much as the Corporates do.
@llanciawn @Havoc_online @ChrisMayLA6 The government, in a democracy, works FOR the people.

@NickSchwanck @llanciawn @Havoc_online

What heresy is this.... the Govt. works *for* the people... whatever next? /s

@ChrisMayLA6 @llanciawn @Havoc_online Well...back in MY day. And, I suspect, yours...

@Havoc_online @ChrisMayLA6

Isn't voting also an attempt to influence the government, if you want to take a broad definition?

@PetraPhoenix @Havoc_online

Yes, of course: voting is terrorism = no elections... for whoever makes the connection (Labour now, or ReformUK later?)

@ChrisMayLA6 @PetraPhoenix @Havoc_online

surely under this delicious logic of attempting to influence the government, donations and think tanks are all terrorists as well?

@Thebratdragon @ChrisMayLA6 @Havoc_online

That does seem to be a logical conclusion.

@Thebratdragon @ChrisMayLA6 @PetraPhoenix @Havoc_online Also, lobbying = terrorism. All lobbying groups should now be proscribed as terrorist organisations.

@Havoc_online @ChrisMayLA6

Is giving someone £5m, 'aimed to influence the government'?

@Havoc_online @ChrisMayLA6 I suppose when I vote, if I choose to vote anything other than Labour, as I am trying to influence the government, I am a terrorist. Lets hope there are plenty of terrorists at every election until this law is revoked and declared unlawful.
@epistatacadam @Havoc_online @ChrisMayLA6 no government right of labour will be doing any such revocations, this law is a very convenient one for fascists

@Havoc_online @ChrisMayLA6 Could be worse - they could have wanted to *overthrow* the government, not just "influence" it.

Like many, many thousands of political activists do every day. Including, at the moment, plenty in the Labour party.

(Of course you "aim to influence the government" every time you fill in a consultation response.)

@Havoc_online @ChrisMayLA6 influencing the government to stop state terrorism and ensure the country obligations towards stopping genocide
@ChrisMayLA6 it's about time these Nazi terrorists finally faced consequences.

@walsonde

That is an odd comment, are you sure you understand what you are responding to?

@houba are you? it is absolutely impossible to ask me this question without downplaying that antisemitic terrorism like from those Hamas Nazis who broke in to the factory. I feel compelled to consider you a Hamas Nazi supporter, since otherwise you would be condemning the terrorists instead of me.

#IBlockNazis

@walsonde

Well that was a nice drive-by and block from a supposed 'anti-fascist' calling me a Nazi.

Well done.

I guess antifa.style has a problem with genocide apologia, all style no substance.

@ChrisMayLA6

next step is declared a terrorist without ever being convicted of anything and imprisoned, I think that is coming later this year.

WE are hurtling into authoritarianism.

@Thebratdragon

yes, the threshold is lowering, mind you given Farmers demonstrated with the clear intent of influencing the Govt. perhaps farmers will also be declared terrorists... which would be an interesting turn of events

@ChrisMayLA6 Farmers will be fine. Farage is on their side so Keir will under no circumstances further upset them or the Daily Mail will call him names.
@ChrisMayLA6 yes, except farmers never get arrested despite breaching the anti -protest provisions on disruption, excess noise, etc so we’ll never know…
@ChrisMayLA6 sending weapons to a genocidal settler colonial power is the real terrorism