In his first 150 days, Mayor Mamdani has:
- closed a $12B deficit
- collected $9M in unpaid fines from Bezos
- recovered $5M in stolen wages for gig workers
- raised minimum wage to $30/hr
- drove violent crime to record lows
- marched for trans rights

I don't ever want to hear an excuse from a single Democrat ever again. Turns out the "radical leftist agenda" is just competent representation.

@Lana

Please be so kind as to make a few Mamdani clones and lend them to us.

Kind regards from Germany. 🤗

@SG800 @Lana +9001%

Or pit the funding aside to get some good folks into a similar position…

https://tech.lgbt/@Netzblockierer/116701551906269058

Netzblockierer (@[email protected])

Content warning: USpol

LGBTQIA+ and Tech
@SG800 @Lana You don't need clones. You need to elect the good people you've already got.

@rupert @SG800 @Lana

Sadly the haphazard early vote last year got us Merz and Reiche. It's not that they're malicious. They're just total incompetent in every measurable dimension. Unfortunately the saying about stupidity and malice goes both ways, i.e. their actions are indistinguishable from intentional malice.

@datenwolf sorry, but they are clearly malicious
@SG800 @Lana We are desperate for one in Oklahoma as well.
@Lana he is the only beacon of light left glowing from the dark corrupt core that is the USA. We see him in Australia as one of the last gleaming's of what the USA should be, not what it is now.
SG800 (@[email protected])

@[email protected] Please be so kind as to make a few Mamdani clones and lend them to us. Kind regards from Germany. 🤗

norden.social

@Lana EXACTLY THAT!

I think the USA needs AOC as POTUS!

  • She may not be the one the US "deserves" [amidst Trump being voted in twice!] but certainly the one the US "needs", cuz I don't see anyone else even remotely able to unfuck the mess the Orange Tyrant created in less than 4+ terms!

Also Mamdani shows the need for EVERY POLITICAN to go outside to constituents and literally "touch grass" to the point that I'd not be surprised if he were to setup a public picnic in Central Park, sitting down in the lawn, taking notes and listening to what people say.

  • Instead of being some corporate ghoul with more seccies around himself than public appearances during the calendar year…

#USpol #AOC #POTUS #OrangeTyrant #Trump #Mamdani #Democrats #Dems #TouchGrass #TouchingGrass

@Lana

I had trouble swallowing the $9 milski from Bezos; looked it up & found it was traffic violations for Amazon delivery trucks. Same pockets I guess. ha

@Lana

And the best part is he is not playing favorites, hes is doing what he is doing for everyone. He does not get up on a podium and bash the "other" side, he just works for the people. ALL the people.
He is a beautiful representation of "Speak softly and carry a big stick".

@Lana this is how you lead.

@Lana

Mamdani's a light in the darkness for sure.

Crazy hysterical language from the media though, up until Reagan what today's media call radical leftism would have been seen as fairly mainstream centrism in the 1970s. We're seeing the same media hysteria in the UK against the leader of our resurgent Green Party.

@TenPastTwo @Lana

Re: Reagan, check out these charts highlighting the changes he made:

https://eldritch.cafe/@SallyStrange/112035379837222783

A few years ago, my started-voting-in-the-1960s Republican mom wondered how she ever raised a Democrat daughter. I rolled my eyes and said that the way things were going, I'd be a socialist in not too long.

Yay Mamdani!

Sally Strange (@[email protected])

Attached: 4 images The Reagan series

Eldritch Café

@Lana

And the democrats fought against him, tooth and nail.

Understanding that unlocks a pathway forward.

@vervain
> And the democrats fought against

What is in the R party had stolen the words Conservative, Right.

What is in the D party had stolen the words Progressive, Left.

On both sides' NCs we have oligarchs sharing the principle to preserve "our god given rights to what we got off the serfs".

Where they differ is in the means to briddle their livestock, us.

@Lana

@Lana
That is double the minimum wage of germany!
@gebastel @Lana
Though the cost of living in NYC is something else.
@martin_ueding
Yes. And when comparing revenues across borders you also need to account for healthcare, unemployment benefits, retirement and so on. I'm no expert on those things in Germany but I bet Germans hav'em better than USians.
@gebastel @Lana

@ScriptFanix @martin_ueding @gebastel @Lana

Middle-aged American here, lived in Germany half my life (though not currently), can confirm.

@gebastel ...which is a scandal given the standard of living in Germany

@Lana

if i can add one more line item:
- the bar for what leftist leadership in the United States

@Lana
That's what “radical leftist agenda” always has been.
@dzwiedziu
I mean, it has also been antifa (NOT "anti-fascist") violence and tyranny. But if OP is right then I celebrate him too, depending on what "trans rights" exactly mean.
@Lana

@light
Bruh, “antifa” is short for “antifascism”, and it's much more akin to anarchism (as in political ideology, not “chaos”) than tyranny.

And if you're not sure what “trans rights” are then ask a trans organisation what it means.

@Lana

@dzwiedziu @Lana
And "DPRK" is short for "Democratic People's Republic of Korea". Your point?
>ask a trans organisation what [“trans rights”] means.
How am I supposed to do that?
None of the sources online, which are usually from various activist orgs, have told me anything meaningful so far.
Why don't you tell me what it means?
I have tried and failed to think of any rights that people are actually entitled to that trans people are unfairly lacking. Now it's your (trans activists) turn.

@light
> And "DPRK" is short for "Democratic People's Republic of Korea". Your point?

Nominal determinism is fake.
DPRK is not doing democracy.
Antifa is doing antifascism.

Which orgs and what did you read? Because if you think that trans people don't lack any rights, then you've read TERF propaganda.

One example that you can easier get T for male gender affirmation therapies than HRT.

So if you're not willing to listen to trans activists, then just leave trans people alone.

@Lana

@dzwiedziu Are we having a debate here or are we having a performative shit-flinging contest? Because if it's the latter then I'd rather not.

@dzwiedziu
>One example that you can easier get T for male gender affirmation therapies than HRT.
How and source?

>leave trans people alone
Already do. But they don't leave me alone.

@light
Search “HRT ban”.

Let me guess, they won't leave you alone, because they exist?

That's why I'm not willing to engage in a debate. I've already noted you as a transphobe a few months ago, and now you're just slowly going there.

Bugger off

@dzwiedziu
>Let me guess, they won't leave you alone, because they exist?
Nope. Because they demand I agree with them that they are literally the opposite gender/sex, not just that I accept their right to modify their body or behaviour (which I am completely willing to do btw).
But of course you don't care about that. You just want to join a movement, feel like you and your gang are right about everything, and attack everyone else.
FUCK. YOU.
@dzwiedziu
>accept their right to modify their body or behaviour (which I am completely willing to do btw)
In fact, I have already done so. It was never an issue.

@light
So you're okay with body modification, but only to the point that *you* accept.

Okay, transphobe.

@dzwiedziu I said "completely", you dunce. That means "completely".

@dzwiedziu It's debatable whether modifying your body into the form of a man or woman actually makes you that sex. I would argue that with the tech we have (which IIRC is basically just cosmetic surgery) it does not.
But that opinion doesn't mean that I don't think they should be allowed to undergo that surgery, you nuance-free fool.

Their body, their choice.
My mind, my choice.

Freedom to express yourself, whether it's your gender-stereotyped style or your philosophical beliefs.

Deal?

@light
I'm sorry, you're calling me a “dunce” and a “nuance-free fool” and expect me to make a “deal” with you?

You're breaking Popper's Paradox (as a social contract) and expect me to meet you half way?

Gender expression includes social gender, so no deals with transphobes.

@dzwiedziu
>I'm sorry, you're calling me a “dunce” and a “nuance-free fool” and expect me to make a “deal” with you?
You called me a "transphobe" first. So fine, don't then. But I'm telling you, people are getting sick of your idpol shit. ~~There will be~~ There is already a reckoning underway. I don't like it; you don't like. But this is what happens when you antagonise people with your identarian tyranny.
@dzwiedziu
>You're breaking Popper's Paradox (as a social contract)
How am I doing that? Wasn't Popper's Paradox about violence? How is anything I'm doing violent?
And it's not intolerant either: I tolerate trans people perfectly well; it's you who don't tolerate my philosophical opinions.

@light
Yeah, you “completely” agree to body modding up to the point you set.

And beyond that you're a transphobe.

No need to prove that further.

@dzwiedziu Ok. Let's try something. Which "point" did I set? Since it is supposedly so clear, it should be easy to point it out, right?

@light
> they demand I agree with them that they are literally the opposite gender/sex

Social gender

@dzwiedziu Is that body-modding? I thought social gender was more about being "accepted" as the opposite gender/sex. That's more like mind-modding than body-modding, and not your own mind at that, other people's minds. Another word for that is thought control.
So if people didn't give you a hard time about pronouns, you would be totally supportive of transsexual body modification. It's an odd hill to die on.
@cy
I *am* totally supportive of transsexual body modification. But I am not at all supportive of pronoun authoritarianism.
Why is this so hard to understand?
I just call people whatever they want. They don't have to know I think they're very silly for caring about it.

@Lana

Imagine this guy becoming president in the US.

@Lana @v_d_richards he’s not born in the USA, he can’t be
@teslawf
People are also constitutionally barred from a third term. Is that stopping the right from campaigning for Trump getting one?
@Lana @v_d_richards
@Lana @Blort @v_d_richards afaik it’s not in the constitution but just because Washington refused to serve a third term?
Roosevelt did 3 terms in a row.

@teslawf @Lana @Blort @v_d_richards

FDR was elected president a whopping 4 times, he just happened to die in office in 1945. The 22nd Amendment to limit it to 2 terms was put into place shortly after.

@Lana The Dems as a whole, lack courage...and have lost their principles.
@Tooden they have no interest in winning because they serve the same masters as the republican candidates. It’s just that MAGA is bringing on the Epsteinite apocalypse much faster and efficiently than anticipated, and such the Dems can just pose themselves as bringing about the end of days in steadier hands than actually caring to do literally anything to pull us out of our imperial decline.
@Tooden which thus makes their positioning doubly absurd as why would the billionaire class want any of this very lucrative venture (the apocalypse) to NOT go any faster? The corporate dems have 0 appeal to their primary demographic, the donor class! If ever there was a moment to dump the corporate overlords this is it! Their power base in the billionaire class is fully leaving for MAGA while the voting public is more progressive than ever.