I am very sorry for you to need to cope with this:

the best option for private chatting TODAY when it comes to #security, usability/user-friendly, #resilience, #digitalindependence and #freedom is #DeltaChat a chat app that uses #SMTP + #IMAP at its backbone, not your favorite "perfect" chat protocol, you don't need new better protocols, you need tools that actually work for the people

#xmpp #matrix #simplex #signal

@adbenitez It's easy to say that one doesn't need better protocols after those better protocols have become so ubiquitous that you don't even realize how you're using them yourself.

Apple APNS and Google FCM use #XMPP technology to deliver push messages instantly. All the other messengers listed (#Signal, #Element, #DeltaChat) thus use XMPP technology. Everyone uses XMPP, but when it is about marketing, suddenly XMPP is not necessary.

@pixelschubsi @adbenitez new protocols are fine. The point may rather be that contrary to popular nerd belief protocols are only one part of an effort. What distinguishes #deltachat from #xmpp is that one is a cross-platform mass-user focused app with a consistent UX across the platforms and using standards under the hood, while the other is a set of specs with many different implementations and UX approaches on the various platforms, and sometimes tenuous compatibility between them.
@delta @adbenitez consistent UX, except when not.
@pixelschubsi @delta @adbenitez
It's not listed as an official client implementation
@darkcat09 @delta @adbenitez Official client implementation of what? Chatmail website also lists a lot of implementations with largely different UX: https://chatmail.at/clients
Chatmail: Clients

Chatmail provides FOSS infrastructure for interoperable, secure, speedy and reliable end-to-end encrypted messaging. Check out clients as Arcane Chat, Bots or Delta Chat today!

@pixelschubsi buddy, you are completely missing the point

yeah, sure anyone can create 3rd party clients that are not feature-complete, but you can always point people to the official Delta Chat client and that is something that exists stable in all platforms, you don't have such stable cross-platform client in XMPP

besides, even the most simple of the demo client has a backup format that is compatible across all clients and it is possible to move from one client to another, in XMPP this doesn't exist, you can't export a backup from Conversations and import it in Gajim, etc

nor can you recommend the same app for desktop, android and Apple users

more importantly: even the most basic of clients have the same audited encryption etc. than the official client, in xmpp you can often end up even without any encryption at all, and super easy to disable it, it is such a bizarre thing not even worth keep talking about, chao

@darkcat09 @delta

@adbenitez @darkcat09 @delta Again, you are comparing Delta Chat (software) with XMPP (protocol). That makes no sense.

Of course I can't recommend the XMPP app for desktop, Android and Apple, because there is no XMPP app. None. Zero.

There are just apps that use the XMPP protocol, typically among other protocols. And DeltaChat is technically such an app (via APNS and FCM). Just like DeltaChat is an app that uses IMAP and SMTP protocols.

@pixelschubsi @adbenitez @delta
But can you recommend a specific XMPP client with a really good UX both for mobile and desktop which would have consistent UI on both platforms?
@pixelschubsi @adbenitez @delta
Not trying to offend or ragebait, sorry, but every xmpp client i tried is extremely inconvenient. All maintained android clients are forks of Conversations so there's virtually no choice. Different clients implement different sets of XEPs, there's no such thing as a protocol version. Popular clients partially doesn't support such basic features as editing and deleting messages. UX of MUCs differs very much from what modern messengers offer as chats/groups, MUCs are more like IRC channels probably. File uploads are done over an HTTP API which must be explicitly enabled and configured on an XMPP server (well, why are you using http instead of The Supreme Xmpp?)