You know there's something wrong with US politics when NASA is forced to communicate in Imperial measurements.

"Orion’s main engine provides up to 6,000 pounds of thrust, enough to accelerate a car from 0 to 60 mph in about 2.7 seconds. At the time of the burn, Orion’s mass was 58,000 pounds and burned approximately 1,000 pounds of fuel during the firing."

https://www.nasa.gov/blogs/missions/2026/04/02/artemis-ii-flight-day-2-orion-completes-tli-burn-crew-begins-journey-to-the-moon/

#space #artemis #nasa

Artemis II Flight Day 2: Orion Completes TLI Burn, Crew Begins Journey to the Moon - NASA

NASA’s Artemis II crew is on the way to the Moon.

NASA

OFFS "On the station, crews rely on more than 4,000 pounds of exercise hardware spread across roughly 850 cubic feet." 🙄

#science #nasa #artemis

NASA's use of Imperial measurements is similar to if US biologists started using species names in the Texas dialect instead of in Latin.

#science #nasa #artemis #space

I can't overstate this. NASA's use of pounds and cubic feet in its outreach efforts does not come across to science-literate people, inside or outside the US, as a sign that the country is a badass superpower that can do what it likes and ignore everyone else.

Instead it suggests that the US is a provincial nation of dungaree-wearing banjo players.

#science #nasa #artemis #space

@mrundkvist I actually wear dungarees and play a banjo.
@btrinen @mrundkvist hahaha me too except it's the cello instead of the banjo although I would very much like to learn the banjo.
@douglasvb @btrinen @mrundkvist yeah of all the things I'm prepared to be ashamed of, giving the world blue jeans and bluegrass is...uh, nowhere on the list
@btrinen @mrundkvist the Artemis rocket is the height of 147 banjos laid end to end

@mrundkvist Worse, NASA lost a spacecraft due to this oractice. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Climate_Orbiter

I don’t see it as superpower bravado but rather the inability to adapt and the low values the public places I. Science and engineering.

Mars Climate Orbiter - Wikipedia

@tsrams @mrundkvist

Having incompatible measurement units can lead to bizarre situations. One of these is the story of the Gimli Glider, a Boeing 767 which, after its fuel density was calculated in pounds per litre instead of kilograms per litre, had to land with no engines on a decommissioned runway on which a motorsport event was taking place.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider

#metric

Gimli Glider - Wikipedia

@Anne_Delong @tsrams @mrundkvist why would you even?
Lucky it wasn’t forced to land in the middle of the North Atlantic.
There are vast swathes where there simply are no motorsports events.
@OneInterestingFact @Anne_Delong @tsrams @mrundkvist Did you read the description of the accident?
@SalemsLot @Anne_Delong @tsrams @mrundkvist
Certainly.
Someone decided to use the wrong units. At a national scale.
Ended up only putting 45% of the fuel they meant into the tanks. Luckily it wasn’t a flight to Europe.
@OneInterestingFact @Anne_Delong @tsrams @mrundkvist Yes. But there was no possibility to have foreseen the usage of a closed military Airport for Motorsports. And certainly not possible to check that in a timeframe of 17 minutes.

@SalemsLot @Anne_Delong @tsrams @mrundkvist

I think we may, in our own way, be making the same point.

@OneInterestingFact @Anne_Delong @tsrams @mrundkvist

Because it was the only runway within hundreds of kilometers. So that, or a dirt field which would nearly guarantee a cataclysmic crash landing.

The Canadian prairies are sparsely populated - probably very sparsely by the standards of wherever you live.

@Anne_Delong @tsrams @mrundkvist Ahh yes, the Gimli Glider, a famously American cock-up on the American Air Canada airline operating between the noted American cities of Montréal and Edmonton.

@dresstokilt @tsrams @mrundkvist

Sorry, I didn't intend to imply that it was an American issue, just that dealing with two different measuring systems can lead to mistakes.

@Anne_Delong @dresstokilt @tsrams @mrundkvist

It was was one of the reasons Canada smartened up and switched to metric.

@chu @dresstokilt @tsrams @mrundkvist

Aside from the fuel issue, it seems that the pilots had not been trained on what to do if both engines were not working, and there was no item in the emergency manual about it. Only because the pilot flew gliders as a hobby did the plane get to the runway (which had a guardrail down the middle for safety during drag races).

@Anne_Delong @dresstokilt @tsrams @mrundkvist

We learnt about the glimi glider in flight school.

It was a long time ago in aviation terms. The industry was not as mature as it is now. It is important to remember that all safety regulations and protocols are written in blood. In general, until sometime fatal (or near fatal happens), things don't get regulated due to lack of information or just lack of understanding.

This was one of those incidents that added to the rule books.

@chu @Anne_Delong @tsrams @mrundkvist We're not even going to talk about the tragedy that was the Legolas Glider.
A Powerless Boeing Falls From The Sky! | Gimli Glider | FULL EPISODE | Mayday: Air Disaster

YouTube
@tsrams @mrundkvist Also without an international view.
@mrundkvist It is frustrating as well for the hundreds of millions of Americans who had no choice of measurement standards in school or everyday life, most of whom neither wear dungarees nor play banjo. Every day I am applying complex conversion formulae just to get by in Mexico. I still don't have an innate sense of either metric sizes or celsius temperatures. Metric is easier, but still a struggle. Poor me.

@farbel @mrundkvist I mean, it's not like we don't have inches and feet in Europe either. I've had to do conversions all my life too because they're commonly used in many contexts. Since the default is metric, I do the conversion the other way of course, but at the end of the day, it's still an additional cognitive load.

I was just discussing wind speed with my brother, who works at an airport. I'm used to metres per second wind speeds, but they use knots.

@veronica @farbel @mrundkvist in Europe? After Brexit? Ireland is (fairly) metric since 2005, isn’t it?

@Tho99 @veronica @farbel @mrundkvist

Ah, aviation...

Altitude is still measured in Flight Levels which are enumerated in thousands of feet (though they're actually a pressure altitude). Even metric flight levels in Russia named that way though the actual altitude varies slightly because of the difference between the metric flight levels and everybody else's feet-based flight levels. So planes may have to adjust their altitude slightly when entering or leaving Russia.

@resuna @Tho99 @farbel @mrundkvist I can think of at least 5 areas for myself. I grew up around boats, and they're still referred to in feet. I've also been around carpentry all my life and although everything is sold in millimetres, it's still often referred to as 2by4, 2by6, 4 inch nails, etc. In my church going days I did sound engineering, where everything is in inches, and I worked in electronics where it's all decimal inches. I also worked in IT where hardware is all inches as well.
@veronica @resuna @Tho99 @mrundkvist I worked with a Swiss carpenter in Tucson for a couple years as his helper. He would use inches, but 1 1/8 would be 1.1. 1 3/16 would be 1.15. Drove me crazy at first, but I got used to it.

@veronica @resuna @Tho99 @farbel @mrundkvist
A 2x4 is 1½ x 3½ inches
A 2x6 is 1½ x 5½ inches

My old house had an addition built by someone who didn't know that, and as a result there's an approximately 1-inch jog where one wall of the addition meets the original house.

@veronica @resuna @Tho99 @farbel @mrundkvist Unless it’s a racing sailboat, and then it’s in meters, which was very confusing.

@Tho99 @veronica @farbel @mrundkvist

PS: I once had to modify some software to deal with flight tracking reports that could be in regular or metric flight levels.

@Tho99 @veronica @farbel @mrundkvist Ireland uses SI and has done for a long time. The pint is the most frequently encountered imperial unit but it's defined in SI units. Distances on road signs are in Km. In NI, still part of the UK, they're in miles.

Brexit has made no difference. A proposal by an arch clown politician in the UK to (Jacob Rees Mogg, aka the minister for the 18th century) revert to Imperial units was essentially laughed out of town.

@samueljohnson @Tho99 @farbel @mrundkvist Yeah, I wasn't referring to the official standards. It's the same here in Norway. Everything is labelled in metric. A 2-by-4 is labelled 48 by 98 mm, and a 3 inch nail is labelled 75 mm, but a lot of things are still made according to inches, and often referred to by the old units.

Not sure if our feet and inches were exactly the same as the imperial, but all of the old units are standardised and rounded to metric units these days.

@samueljohnson @Tho99 @farbel @mrundkvist I owned a house built in 1938, and it was really annoying renovating it because it was built with 3-by-3 and 3-by-6 inch lumber, but not using the 25.4 mm inches. The 3 inch stuff was around 79 mm I think.
@veronica @samueljohnson @Tho99 @farbel @mrundkvist My house in Canada was built in the 1920s, but has undergone a number of renovations since. The walls contain a mix of 2-inch-by-four-inch 2x4s, modern shrunken 2x4s, and in a few places even-more-modern bent-sheet-metal studs. Not mixed in the same wall, fortunately.
@veronica @samueljohnson @Tho99 @mrundkvist The joke is, a 2x4 isn't even a 2x4, at least not in the US. It is a 2x4 prior to milling, so in reality measures more like 1 1/2x3 1/2, or 38mmx89mm.
@farbel We have 1.5-by-4 and 1.5-by-3 too, which are common for interior walls. At least when I renovated. I seem to remember they were 36x98 and 36x68 mm, respectively. I remember it being annoying that two 1.5-by-3 did not make a square, but 72x68 mm.
@veronica @farbel @mrundkvist I’ll concede knots and nautical miles as they’re based on arc segments and genuinely useful for long distance travel on a sphere, but the use of feet for altitude is an aspect of American imperialism that absolutely sticks in my craw.
@sendai @veronica @mrundkvist I suppose if it hadn't been the US and UK who developed aviation, we might use meters today. China and Russia do.
@farbel @veronica @mrundkvist Haa, yes, but sorta no. Aviation in China uses metric flight levels, but for safety considerations now uses an adapted imperial flight levels between 8900–12500m.
@sendai @veronica @mrundkvist That has to be confusing as all getout.
@farbel @mrundkvist I feel you. I've spent significant time living outside the US, and celsius temps are still all but meaningless to me.

@drhoopoe @farbel @mrundkvist I moved to Canada 35 years ago, but it took me only a year or so to become comfortable with Celsius in everyday life. You just have to learn new numeric names for things like `really cold', `chilly', `warm', `too damn hot'.

But I had the unfair advantage of being interested in science and studying physics for a time back in my US days.

@oclsc @drhoopoe @mrundkvist I think the biggest difficulty for me is that the difference between numbers is double that of Farenheit. I'll figure it out.
@farbel @drhoopoe @mrundkvist Yeah, you get used to it. In either system one mostly just thinks about the nearest round number. e.g. it's over 70 == it's over 20 == it's unreasonably warm (to my taste). 22 or 74 means it's a a bit warmer.
@farbel @drhoopoe @mrundkvist Or to take an active example, I wish the damn facilities people at work would replace the thermostat in my office, which keeps jumping up to 24.9 on its own, winter or summer. At this point I don't really expect them to fix it before I throw in the towel and retire (not for that reason, though).
@mrundkvist You know all of our standards are metric then converted to imperial? When you buy a pound of cheese, you’re really getting just under half a kilo.
@Mutedog @mrundkvist Yeah, though how “science literate” are people who can’t do the conversion when they need to.
@gdinwiddie @Mutedog @mrundkvist Yes one can do it, but it's extra load. I used to write about the Oil & Gas business and everyone measures oil in barrels. Which in the US are 50 gallons but only 45 in the UK, not because of barrels are smaller but because our gallons are bigger. Then there are tons. US ton = 2000 pounds, UK ton 2240 pounds so the US version is sometimes called a short ton. The SI tonne is 1000Kg which is almost the same as a UK ton
@pthane @gdinwiddie @mrundkvist hahaha, I meant both as in a super power country and also full of banjo playing yokels

@pthane @Mutedog @mrundkvist
@aumalatj

Which means that you should choose the units with an eye to the use, not that there should be one set of units required for every measure.

For NASA communicating with the American public, imperial measures will communicate with the least friction.

@pthane @Mutedog @mrundkvist
Another consideration for choosing units of measure is the precision needed. I once read an article that made a good argument to use units that resulted in useful numbers with two significant digits to the left of the decimal point. This allows easy reasoning without calculations.

This article pointed out that the best unit for studying the migration of tortoises was "furlongs per fortnight."

@mrundkvist Don't give them ideas now ...
@mrundkvist I'm reminded of American country lawyers' pronunciations of French and Latin legal terms of art