@vwbusguy @Natasha_Jay @Meerkat26 Iβd take her more serious without the two (!) crosses on extra display.
Around 2:40 she loses the plot. Yes, age 8, but thereβs still the possibility of having acquired knowledge from the household, and we all are sad that knowledge from those times was not generally preserved in writing (or whatever writing was on hasnβt endured, or was burnt by people like her, etc).
I would be interested in UPG from people-with-some-credibility about these, though.
What she does here is try to approach this with a double-role of christian scholar and evidence-based historian. Everything else does not count in her eyes.
Around 3:40 she completely loses it again.
As for rabbits, mediæval people associated them with the Virgin Mary because mediæval people thought that rabbits experienced virgin birth.
I have been assured by farm-type people, lady, that people living in such a setting (mediΓ¦val farm-type) know intimately well where offspring (especially of lifestock) comes from. (Now, people whoβve grown up in cloisters from age 8β¦ might not know well, unless they were assigned to the section (out of sight, out of mind) who cared for theirs, instead of being their scholars and historians.) (This point does of course not prove a connection between rabbits and Δostre-or-what-have you, but it does sow sufficient doubt in the presentation of a whole and her methods. (And, in fact, the whole rabbits-and-eggs to fertility link never sat well with me anyway, but hips (think of that Venus-of-someplace statue from prehistoric times) and thingsβ¦ are.)
Roughly a thousand years after the conversation to Christianity
Sheβs not aware ofβ¦
- conversation because the higher-ups say so, but we believe anyway
- folk belief
- β¦
β¦, is she? She sounds like one of these evangelical narrow-minded ivy tower preachers here. (Again, not arguing in favour of that specific link. But, substrates exist, as does merging of βlocal traditionsβ (nice euphemism) and βchristianβ holidays.)
β¦ I cannot believe I didnβt DNF this.