Much like ACAB, even "good" corporations are still fucking corporations.
Brand loyalty is a parasocial relationship.
Much like ACAB, even "good" corporations are still fucking corporations.
Brand loyalty is a parasocial relationship.
@alice At first I read the last sentence as "a parasitic relationship" and I was like yeah that sounds about right
But also yes, all of this
@alice 100% Corporations are not people. They do not have rights. They should be politically neutral. We shouldn't have to practice social activism based upon where we buy plywood.
Honestly corporations shouldn't exist at all.
@MikeStok @Darkasvim @alice @mralancooper
They should exist, but they should be owned by their workers. This system is already up and running. It just needs to scale up. Worker self-owned, worker self managed workplaces not only exist, but in most cases they’re thriving. They range in size from a single pizza joint run by a handful of hippies to a multi-million dollar, multi-national holding company.
See:
Time for all the corporations to be broken up
"Good" corporations?
With a cop, I guess if they're nice and seem somewhat anti-authoritarian, I understand why one would make that faulty assumption.
But how in the world could one ever mistake a corporation for "good"?
@alice Some are outright bad; some are not outright bad, but the best you're going to get is: totally uninterested in any of your concerns.
"Good" corporations would have peoples' interests aligned with their own. So, yes. All corporations are bastards.
that's because corps value ethics and morality only in the context of profit.
this is by design.
(nice how the same acronym works for both of them too isn't it? Dovetails nicely cause, yk, one enables and protects the other, and all...)
We call their fans/enablers corpo's for plural and corpo for singular, right?
I get that it can be hard, due to nostalgia and what not to step out of those parasocial relationships. Yet you should
Because they didn't get there by playing fair all the way, and all the time. None have, none will.
@Aprazeth @alice honestly, brand loyalty feels weird though... I don't get what's hard about using corporations and their products as yools, either suited or unsuited to your current needs
(including the need to do minimum harm)
corporations are machines created to make money, and havingparasocial relationships with them is odd 
@OctaviaConAmore
For most people is not the corporation they develop that with - it is with their products. Especially nostalgia.
The brand and type of cookies wr got when visiting our friends/family when we were a kid. The instant noodles that were the only thing people could afford during tough times, and so on.
That all said: if the only thing people can afford is corporation owned, and they need it for survival: do not feel pressured or shamed to change until safe to do so
I doubt some coporations too.
@alice Sadly "no ethical consumption..."
Sure none of them are "good", but boy howdy are there layers of bad
I always think of The Good Place when having this conversation with people...
There's actually nothing truly ethical when we live in a society like ours.
@alice
Publicly owned corporations are evil by default.
iirc there was a study where someone did a psychological study of corporations and concluded that all publicly owned ones are sociopaths/psychopaths.
Privately owned ones depend on the owner.
@alice It has taken me a long time to realize I need to break some habits like saying "let me google that" or etc. It's hard to break that one in particular, yet if there is anyone who truly deserves to be broken, it's Google...
And OMG the Apple fanatics...