A thing being repeated across businesses worldwide, including at Microsoft, is C level execs struggling to know why most staff aren’t using Copilot for M365, despite how much it costs.
Because most staff don’t spend all day in Teams meetings reading out PowerPoint slides to people who pretend to care. They have actual jobs. Doing work. Which they know how to do. Because it is their job.
GenAI is a plausible bullshit generator. If it can replace your work, guess what your work always was?
I'll wait... I know the cognitive damage genAI use causes.
I feel I have to add this is solidly targeted at high payed bullshitters.
I have full compassion for people doing menial bullshit work.
We all know we should just go for UBI and move away from the "earn a living" horror, but that would inconvenience our Neo-feudal overlords, so good for you for just phoning it in.
@logorok @avuko @GossiTheDog universal base image
Or the actual answer is universal basic income
@GossiTheDog If they want to replace a person it would imply giving someone the same access as the person you are trying to replace.
And even though a AI can probably manage to login to a Palo Alto with MFA after some effort, and parse some logs. I'd wonder if it would just fix it with a any-any rule.
Not even considering the human conversation where they tell you they only need port X. 😉
@GossiTheDog Certainly for software development there seems to be an underlying belief with non-engineers (especially management “I wrote a website once” types) that writing software “is just typing”.
What you describe fits that theory pretty well IMO
@thirstybear @GossiTheDog we saw lots of:
# add 1 to x
x = x + 1
@caskfan @thirstybear @GossiTheDog Yes also misapplication of coding standards, such as to avoid unnamed constants in the code.
i = i + 1;
becomes
#define ONE 1
i = i + ONE;
and the code passes review.
@caskfan @GossiTheDog I honestly thought we had grown out of that as an industry back in the 80s/90s because it simply does not work.
AI seems to be dragging us back: “Ooh! Look at all the code we can now generate! We can get applications done twice as quickly with fewer people! Never mind the quality, feel the width!” 🤦♂️
@caskfan @GossiTheDog Finally got around to watching this video and suddenly some more things start to make sense.
Batten down the hatches, folks, it's going to be a rough ride for a few years.
This is a really quite interesting point of view that makes some kind of perverted sense. Certainly food for thought. Rory Sutherland (VC, Ogilvy UK) 2026 predictions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SXCJhqXubU
Type 2 AI Psychosis 😕
Having had the pleasure (or really torture) of observing Large Corporate [attempted] Software Development (with SAFe) recently, I've started to wonder if …
“The main objective of software development teams these days is to produce impressive-looking management reports. Not reliable working software.”
💢
😢