@claudius @grumpygamer it's a solution in search of a problem, like most of the other dumb shit corps keep trying
yeah, there are definitely people using it. the numbers aren't inspiring, especially for recurring users. it's been tried at least a half dozen times with pretty much zero lasting success.
from sensorama to headsight to videoplace to virtuality to virtual boy to the current devices. it's just not a useful format. that's why it keeps failing. existing interfaces work better.
@danibarca @grumpygamer @claudius
Well, it's not like it is the first attempt to establish VR.
@danibarca @grumpygamer @claudius
For games, teaching people how to drive and a few other things it might have real potential BUT it is not how people are going to want to interface with the world or even their devices on a regular basis,.
@danibarca @grumpygamer @claudius except for the fact that touchscreens were immediately useful the second they were introduced. palm pilots were hugely popular, lots of places adopted touchscreens for POS, even in CRT, these things actually had applications and met needs.
VR has been around for 70+ years and has not had any lasting use case. and it's been tried dozens of times. when will it be ready? billions have been thrown at the technology.
VR is a self-licking ice cream cone.
@danibarca @grumpygamer @claudius again, touchscreens were immediately useful the moment they were introduced. they had actual use cases. that has yet to arise for VR.
i mention timescale and prior attempts in the hope that it's instructive. this technology does not solve any actual problem.
"millions" is - at best - extreme. look at steam charts. even the alltime peaks are <500k people. the current peaks are <85k people in even the most popular applications
@dank @danibarca @grumpygamer @claudius
> VR has not had any lasting use case
That's just plain false, unless you only consider a "use case" what makes you big money.
I am glad that Meta invested so much in VR and even more glad that the "Metaverse" BS failed, because now VR is still left as a niche (less people = slower enshittification) but with much better tech than 10 years ago.
At the same time VR tech is still advancing and being pushed by smaller companies, which is also a good thing.
@grumpygamer but there is a subset of people who don't fit into any of those groups. It will never be main stream in its current form, but there is definitely a niche audience out there. I'm friends with a few of them.
The Idea that people would live their entire day in a headset was incredibly stupid. The mountain of money burned on it was disgusting.
@claudius @grumpygamer I'm afraid it won't thrive much. The only ones pumping money into it were Meta because of their Metaverse dream.
Let's what Valve has in store, but I'm not holding my breath.
If Mark Zuckerberg wants to spend $75,000,000,000 on βAIβ then Iβm all for it. Contact me for my bank account details and Iβll spend it all on βAIβ.
When we grew up we just had imaginary friends and they didn't waste massive amounts of water and energy.
βThe accidental Dunning-Kruger "expert".
Correct and successful once and therefore believes every next big idea must be the next big thing, even when they fail.
@grumpygamer VR is a cool medium though and a growing market, just not the hype everyone said and out of all people he misunderstood it most lol. Everything people really wanted he ignored but hey floating hands and torso are still good in his book lol.
But him crying in LLM will be funny as hell.
I seem to recall this guy saying anyone over the age of 30 shouldn't try to start new companies.
...like so many hyperwealhy people π
@grumpygamer that's a pretty unkind thing to say...
...against typical idiots.
He needs something beyond "<< made my billions from an ogling website>>
Satya Nadella 'bet the company' on Mixed Reality in 2016. Now he's 'betting the company' on AI, which is surprising because he lost it in the last bet so it isn't his anymore.
He also bet "Mobile First, Cloud First" in 2014 - and the cloud part really took off
The cloud bit is doing pretty well. M365 is a big earner and Azure made it to the number two spot. Mobile much less so, Windows Phone died and the mobile versions of the Office apps are just about usable.
Amy Hood has talked about how great it is that MS's revenue is diversified. But the rest of the SLT seems to think this means 'stop investing in anything that produces revenue today, and try to add more things'. And that works really well in the short term.
Thank you, I've been making this point as well.
Zuccs has never had a good idea, unless you consider ripping off those two goofball crypto twins to repackage hot or not for college campuses a good idea.
Outside that, all he has done for the last decade or so is set billions of dollars on fire. He bought and then proceeded to start destroying Instagram to avoid competition. Which, I guess was kind of smart, but also a really crummy thing to do.
Why people still listen to him is beyond me. He's also shilling those dork-ass privacy crushing glasses, and people still treat his thoughts seriously. I don't get it.
It must be, "he's a billionaire, so he must be smart." I suspect the same people probably think Elongated Muskrat is a genius, despite all available proof to the contrary.
Anyway, just wanted to tell you that I agree, and I think you are right on the money here.
@grumpygamer AI as social media is simply the dumbest idea i have ever seen.
Saying that as someone that works using AI
"Idiot" and "moron" are #abliest slurs with roots in eugenics.
They're Oldspeak. Today in Wokespeak we say "differently special".