@anildash
And translucent glass effects.
So *that's* where the Enlightenment developers all disappeared to!
@anildash last time i checked MacOs had the worst virtual desktop management of all modern desktops, maybe slightly better than W10. It's so bad that it made it look unnecessary and impractical. It's no wonder they have to offer 3 different interfaces to compensate for these design choices.
GNOME on the other hand has the best virtual desktop implementation, it's so good it makes it feel like a natural option.
The fact that GNU/Linux can beat MacOs is insane, 15 years ago it wouldn't happen.
@EpiphanicSynchronicity @ozamidas @anildash no gnome stayed that bad. I like free software operating systems because you find install then stay with the desktop and/or window manager you like. #xfce in my case, or #i3 / #sway.
Note that most free software window managers / desktops can be installed on the BSDs too so it's wrong to call these #linux when you are referring to the user interface. A few have hooks to systemd which ties them to the linux kernel, but most don't.
@EpiphanicSynchronicity @anildash as far as i can tell GNOME has never done that. It only creates a new virtual desktop if you occupy the empty one. I think that's pretty neat.
In GNOME 49 apps always open with the size you've assigned so i think that one has been solved.
@EpiphanicSynchronicity @anildash interesting.
In GNOME if you press crtl+alt and the arrows you can move to the other desktops.
In theory it seems like a very practical option but in practice it loses to the super+tab combination which takes you automatically to the application. EIther way at leat MacOs can do that.
One amazing thing about 2025 is that, if you start up an Apple product, it forces you to choose between _three different_ window mangers, but if you start up a clean install of a current version of Linux, it just chooses good defaults for you.
Good defaults are relative with regards to desktops.
Most linux distributions give users a choice, from lumbering Memory Hog Gnome to Flashy memory hog KDE then on to more decent non distracting options like ICEWM LXde etc.
@Vash @anildash
What I am really interested is, how you call Windows, if KDE and Gnome are memory hogs?
What I call windoze, 10 usable when forced, 11 buggy spyware crap :-)
Win 10 and 11 look like massive memory hogs due preemptive application loading,
Presently I am using about 904 M while writing this. CUPS and sane plus sound daemons running, plus conky and htop.
I prefer distraction free so generaly ICEWM is my choice.
I give some user support work so on other desktops fairly often.
@anildash I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as Linux, is in fact, Gnome on Redhat, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Gnome plus X.11 on Redhat on Linux. Linux is not a window manager unto itself … etc
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=I%27d+just+like+to+interject+for+a+moment
A classic copy-pasta often attributed to rms but contains parts that he denied being from him. It's best used whenever you see a debate over the correct format of Linux and GNU/Linux. I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to...
@anildash, Apple is going the wrong way and it might be just the right time for Linux DEs to take the torch...
btw, I really enjoyed that speech (https://youtu.be/1fZTOjd_bOQ) recently, a lot of similar thoughts there...
