Good morning from Elsevier. When I open my inbox to be greeted by this, I know the time has come to leave academia. It is rotten to the core, and totally lost sight of its *telos*. Read the article if you like. It is a lost delusion. States "AI is a tool" multiple times. It's not. Its a pattern matching text generator. (Jon Dron wrote a great piece on this recently.)

#academia #academicchatter #ai #genai
https://www.elsevier.com/connect/rethinking-peer-review-in-the-ai-era-with-responsibility-and-transparency

@DrPen 😖
@DrPen scientific articles and peer-reviewing is the latest place that we'll ever want or need "AI" in!! But of course coming from #Elsevier that's not surprising at all that they're considering it - they want money, not truth
@DrPen Well I would say everybody agrees that Elsevier is rotten to the core.
@DrPen And always the same mantra... "AI as a support tool, not a substitute". As support tool for researchers, a support tool for physicians... this shortsighted, neoliberal, stupid movement just can't wait to replace us by stochastic parrots.
It's not just the academia, it's society what is rotten.

@DrPen Elsevier is just a parasite getting fat on the work of researchers.

Or maybe... "Elsevier could be categorized as organized crime, laundering grant money through a distributed network of researchers."

@wakame @DrPen a distributed and largely reluctant network of reserachers, who only use them because otherwise they fall off the tenure track #lang_en

@DrPen
the
"Want to sharpen your peer review skills?"
had me ('m not an academic, my wife is/was)

answer is simple:
put AI & Elsevier together & KIWF: Kill it with fire!
`w;7[) #prplXprpgnd

@DrPen
No, don't leave Academia, leave Elsevier and join Hal ;)
#Science #academia #publishers

https://hal.science/

Home - Archive ouverte HAL

@hadon yes, it's in fact a good idea. I've got a few papers on Socarxiv but Hal has a better presence in search results, so I should move in there!

@DrPen One wonders who is an "Elsevier Expert" and who is in the "Research Academy Team", or whether these are all LLMs to begin with, given the content.

#academia

@albertcardona considering the high ratio of em-dashes in the email text I thought it was either AI generated or they are just trolling us.
@DrPen perhaps you missed the point? first, text generators can be tools (wearher you like it or not). second, they repeatedly state there is no replacement for human judgement. and last, what they insinuate is kind of worse than what you suggest: they are talking about using it "responsibly" and immediately state that their current policies forbid you to give (or make?) your manuscript with LLM, bit they will be more than happy to feed it there...
Just a metatool? Some thoughts why generative AIs are not tools

Many people brush generative AI aside as being just a tool. ChatGPT describes itself as such (I asked). I think it’s more complicated than that, and this post is going to be an attempt to explain w…

Jon Dron's home page
@DrPen ok, i read it. i don't see where the statement you claim (llm's are not tools) is proven there. it seemed more like a free flowing mind dump than some structured argument.
@grepe well I think we'll have to agree to differ