Reboost ♻️ plz: In light of increased uncertainty on the reliability on the US, European democracies should strengthen their strategic autonomy: this also includes autonomy from #Microsoft #Windows in the public and private sector.

https://eu-os.gitlab.io proposes to develop together a Community-led Proof-of-Concept for a free/libre replacement of Windows. Follow us on Mastodon and join the Matrix chat at https://matrix.to/#/#eu-os:kde.org to receive updates and help.

/cc @EC_OSPO
#Linux #Trump #Endof10

EU OS

Proof-of-Concept OS for the EU

EU OS Proof-of-Concept
@eu_os @EC_OSPO I hope it'll come with the #StarTrek #LCARS UI 🖖 😉
@eu_os @EC_OSPO
Excellent. Not someone who can help, but I would so appreciate this.
@eu_os @EC_OSPO this is a great initiative. A key thing to get adoption will be to make sure it is properly localised and accessible. No captchas and no flags representing languages; or a large number of potential users will be alienated.

@eu_os @EC_OSPO

Is this a KDE project?

@toran @eu_os @EC_OSPO

Currently it is not a KDE project. Once the #EU_OS planning is more advanced and concrete, it is obviously something to look into. First discussions took place already.

@eu_os @EC_OSPO While the idea is a good one, if you're going to start a new distro why not ditch the legacy way of configuring systems and use a #NixOS / #Guix style approach?

And please use LTS kernels and #ZFS for the filesystem.

@MediocreWightMan @eu_os @EC_OSPO

#EU_OS should not need to be a new distro. Please read: https://eu-os.gitlab.io/goals#goals

Goals | EU OS

Proof-of-Concept OS for the EU

EU OS Proof-of-Concept

@rriemann @eu_os @EC_OSPO Looking at that it seems like it would be much easier to implement in #NixOS.

Each “layer” could be as simple as a separate file included in configuration.nix.

You’d also get LTS kernels as default and built-in support for the superior #ZFS filesystem.

Two points:
a) Is basing on Fedora really a good idea for an European project? I don't think so: Fedora is depending in Redhat, which is USA-based.

b) You are aware of Univention Corporate Server, which allows to centrally manage users and machines? I assume you are, but it is missing in the list if similar projects. (And I guess, UCS is not the only solution.)

@rriemann @MediocreWightMan @eu_os @EC_OSPO

@kirschwipfel @rriemann @MediocreWightMan @eu_os @EC_OSPO

It does seem that:

* Red Hat, Inc. "retains liability" for the Fedora project [1][2]

* Red Hat, Inc is a subsidiary of IBM since 2019 [2]

* 35% of Fedora contributors are employees of Red Hat [1]

EU digital sovereignty would probably be more robust with #Debian or a Debian derivative rather than Fedora.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedora_Project

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat

Fedora Project - Wikipedia

@boud @kirschwipfel @MediocreWightMan @eu_os @EC_OSPO

It would be much better to gather these arguments in the Gitlab Kanban at https://gitlab.com/eu-os/eu-os.gitlab.io/-/boards

I am aware of @univention. Though this only solves partially the problem you bring up. As far as I know, it also builds on top of many components that enjoy much support from #Redhat. Think of #FreeIPA and #Keycloak for instance.

Project Management · Boards · eu-os / EU OS Docs and Planning · GitLab

Documentation and Planning for EU OS at https://eu-os.gitlab.io/

GitLab

Redhat is a big player in Linux and many components are driven by them, that true. (Most centrally: systemd) Anyhow IMHO it's still a difference whether you use components or a whole distro: in case e.g. Redhat fails, chances are high that a non-Redhat-distro changes the component, whereas Fedora will not be changed.

And another aspect: Fedora will come with USA-mindet defaults (e.g. Google DNS as default fallback), while another distro might already remove these - less burden for you.

@rriemann @boud @MediocreWightMan @eu_os @EC_OSPO @univention

@kirschwipfel Yep. I would go with OpenSUSE as it's a very professional and polished German distro. Although not perfect, i would slow down the updates. I can't think of another European distro that is well polished, everything seems to be from USA.
@eu_os @EC_OSPO So kinda like ReactOS?
@eu_os in my opinion would be better if based on Debian or Ubuntu instead of Fedora. The reason is that Fedora upgrades are very frequent compared to Debian or Ubuntu LTS.
@nulll @eu_os I think Ubuntu should not be a good choice.
https://youtu.be/CP8CNp-vksc?feature=shared
Richard Stallman Talks About Ubuntu

YouTube

@forolinux @nulll @eu_os

I have discussed the choice of the underlying OS also with @kde community members. At best, there is a range of OSs to choose from without breaking the setup otherwise.

#CERN 🇪🇺 uses #Almalinux. I think for those that aim for a full production setup, this could be a good fit.

https://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind2212&L=SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS&P=78

LISTSERV - SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives - LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

@rriemann @nulll @eu_os @kde My knowledge about the distributions is not good enough to make that decision, but at least I think I have some info to know which one would not be a good choice.
If the CERN choose AlmaLinux then this distro could be a good option.
Anyway the actual dependencies in non EU, or USA privative software and hardware is too high.

@eu_os @EC_OSPO Why the presumption of Fedora with KDE? In most systems end users can choose their desktop environment before they log in. Maintaining a choice forces developers to stick to standards.

You've already lost my interest.

@eu_os @EC_OSPO Please Brasil... Take notes here =)
@eu_os @EC_OSPO Is a rolling release model suitable for the public sector?
@eu_os Is a rather amusing annousement if one considers your distribution is based on Fedora (Founded and managed by Red Hat). It should use, at least openSUSE or Debian as base but, ideally, it should be independent. Otherwise is just a joke.
@eu_os @EC_OSPO the only part of this I'm not too fond of is the fact its using GitLab by default when it ideally should use something else that isn't beholden to a US corporation.
@tulpenkiste @eu_os @EC_OSPO yeah @Codeberg is already here and it's hosted in europe

@eu_os @EC_OSPO
>a free/libre replacement for windows
Oh, so kind of like KDE Plasma, Xfce, Cinnamon Desktop, Cosmic Desktop, MATE Desktop, and LXQt?

And Gnome I guess for the IPad aficionados.

@eu_os that's very cool and needed. Long overdue by our public offices. Nice to see it being proposed
@eu_os @EC_OSPO We're happy to help power this with @bluebuild

@eu_os @EC_OSPO

Why not go with OpenSUSe?
It's actually more EU than Fedora.

@opensuse

@Hieronymus @eu_os @EC_OSPO @opensuse

Read here: https://eupolicy.social/@eu_os/114185950511915445

The layering mechanism offered by rpm-ostree/bootc permits to reuse container tooling and expertise already available in the public sector and to share common layers per country/region/sector. So far, opensuse does not support bootc. @kalpa is the atomic distro for opensuse, which also has layers, but they are not necessarily shared between different machines.

EU OS (@[email protected])

Today @[email protected] covered in his Youtube show #EU_OS. Thanks for putting us in your spotlight! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bu3S2A02FFc Few comments ahead of a possible appearance in the show in the future: 1) indeed, we are in concept phase. Join us here, on matrix at #eu-os:kde.org or at https://gitlab.com/eu-os/eu-os.gitlab.io/-/boards/9013559 if you like to contribute. 2) @[email protected] is well known, but it's atomic @[email protected] does not have the layering support and tooling like @[email protected] or @[email protected] 3) On the US: it's not so black/white.

EUpolicy.social - A Mastodon server for the EU bubble

@rriemann @Hieronymus @eu_os @EC_OSPO @opensuse

I mean, at the moment, if you were going to look at "openSUSE Based Atomic/Immutables" I'd direct you to #Aeon as they're further ahead in their development than #Kalpa is.

https://aeondesktop.org

Aeon

@eu_os @EC_OSPO 👏👏 This is an important step in the right direction!

I am so grateful Trump for making opensource great again!

@eu_os @EC_OSPO

@eu_os @EC_OSPO Wait, this is official!?!?
EDIT: It is not, sad.
@Azarilh @eu_os @EC_OSPO No, they are marketing themself relevant with confusing the readers. They are not relevant. They are simply yet another Linux distro… They are free to make a distro. Just not expect them to be relevant… They have no ties to EU or OpenDesk or … . And also Linux can be used in public offices today. Problem is the many surrounding IT systems making use of MS365 … When these systems start supporting Nextcloud and/or OpenCloud a lot is done. We don’t need yet another distro.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) | EU OS

Proof-of-Concept OS for the EU

EU OS Proof-of-Concept
@rriemann @Azarilh @eu_os @EC_OSPO And that is already possible. We do that today without Active Directory. Again, this project doesn’t necessarily bring us anything new and it is just yet another distro (and one that focuses only on KDE).

https://eu-os.gitlab.io received a few updates today after some legit criticism.

- Logo has now consistently a purple gradient for more distinction to EU flag 🇪🇺.
- Home page: EU OS is not yet an EU project
- FAQs acknowledge that Linux is already used in the public sector. The unique selling point is better clarified: use of #bootc and more collaboration across the EU to bring down the costs for a migration from Windows #endof10
- university of Oslo added to use cases 🎉

@frankps

1/2

EU OS

Proof-of-Concept OS for the EU

EU OS Proof-of-Concept

2/2

EU OS is one of many projects that aim for a higher adoption of free operating systems. Let us all work together.

Our estimated public sector migration status 😉 :

@frankps @rriemann @Azarilh @eu_os @EC_OSPO

Containers have revolutionized the server application industry. The same approach applied to the OS for workstations is incredibly powerful and currently only uBlue project is taking advantage of it. No new distro, the distros are Fedora, CentOS, AlmaLinux and whatever will support Bootc. Imagine at the time Docker was released someone saying "no need for another distro"...

@frankps The Mastodon account is lead by the Technology & Privacy unit of the European Data Protection Supervisor. So while not a official EU project, it is a project by someone high in EU.

@Azarilh They should still distinguish themselves as something not official.

I have nothing against Linux. But we have plenty of good distros. What we need is good IT services for the Linux users. Both European and national ones.

An example: Most archiving systems only support MS 365...

These kind of problems must be solved if more people in public offices should be able to use Linux on the desktop! And this should mostly be solved on national level.

@frankps I absolutely agree with that.
@eu_os @EC_OSPO not really smart to base it on Fedora, when Suse (and plenty more) exists.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) | EU OS

Proof-of-Concept OS for the EU

EU OS Proof-of-Concept
@eu_os @noctilua @EC_OSPO why American fedora? You have opensuse!
@eu_os @EC_OSPO While I support the idea, the highlighted use cases by authoritarian governments don't really go well with me

@eu_os @EC_OSPO

@thelinuxEXP hey Nick, have you heard about this project? I think it could be amazing if you mentioned it in one of your tech news videos!

I'm sure your community could be interested to learn about EU OS!