Things I regret: Looking at github issues for the open-source self-driving car conversion kit.
Thousands of people use these things on public roads.
Things I regret: Looking at github issues for the open-source self-driving car conversion kit.
Thousands of people use these things on public roads.
The most damning evidence I've ever seen for "this device is only used by single people":
If you have a passenger they *also* have to be looking at the road or it sets off the "pay attention" alarm.
Or they can put their head on the dashboard.
@jonty it blows my mind that someone sells a device that sticks onto the windscreen, and people plug it into their car's CANbus and let it drive them around.
10,000 users on the roads, and a disclaimer that says "THIS IS ALPHA QUALITY SOFTWARE FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY. THIS IS NOT A PRODUCT. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED."
I'm beginning to think humans were a mistake, let alone computers.
@[email protected] I'm increasingly of the opinion that we made a big mistake in coming down from the trees in the first place. @jonty
@Floppy @jonty tbh it only says this in "licensing", and who reads licenses these days?
This should have never been made public, let alone being sold with all these "new low price - it drives your car for $999!". Or at the very least it should have come with huge warnings everywhere telling that using it on public roads is illegal, not this fig leaf of "you are responsible for complying with local laws" buried in "licensing" on GitHub.
On the first glance it seems that if you buy this $1k device from their website, you won't even visit the page that says this disclaimer. "For research purposes only" is only on the GitHub to serve as legal insurance apparently; they're selling the device to regular car owners, as "purpose built to run openpilot", and nowhere on their website does it say that it's "for research purposes". It's as if you would have bought a new car from a car dealership, and it had "only for research purposes" hidden somewhere deep in the EULA.
The creators of this shit should be prosecuted imo.
Describe the bug The 2022 Acura RDX shows the max speed on the instrument cluster, plus comma shows the max speed on the screen, but these max speeds do not match. The instrument cluster is a littl...
@jonty Oh hell this is going to turn me into one of those, "sorry kids, you're not allowed to be on roads in any form ever again, it's for your own good" dads.
Like . . . people just turning loose killer robots for fun and tinkering with them as they go.
@simonbp @jonty granted, in Germany cops would instantly pull over someone with some #DIY #SelfDriving and definitiely confiscate the license and impound the vehicle as evidence for a case of "criminal negligence" and multiple violations of traffic code.
@simonbp @jonty OFC, that's the same with illegally loud mufflers...
@jonty so their software (!!!) will happily keep running even when a core functionality isn’t responding, and yet they claim to have functional safety?
Either they’re lying about meeting ISO-26262 or automotive control safety standards are a complete joke
@jonty "THIS IS NOT A PRODUCT." and yet it costs $999????
"THIS IS ALPHA QUALITY SOFTWARE FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY" I am sure everyone using it understands that
What an irresponsible thing to do
@jonty The commercial stuff isn't much better. My car came with lane centering, and it's only usable on the interstate.
My semi has some of this stuff too, but only for automated braking. That being said, it will randomly kill the cruise control with no notice and sometimes it will read an American square interstate sign and decide that it's a round EU one and display the speed limit in KM/H. What makes this worse, is that the system they install now is seemingly untouched and unupgraded over the ones they were installing in 2010.
I'll be receiving my Comma.ai device today. A few of the bugs you featured are actually problems with the car's feature, not the OpenPilot device. Or the OpenPilot device wasn't installed symmetrically (yes, they should have an offset setting).
The devices do NOT have an operating system; you must load the OS yourself. This is a minor barrier to entry, but at least people can't buy one, and Plug-n-Play-n-Die
In some cars, you must run an exploit (real shellcode) to extract security keys to MiTM the communications.
Huge fucking security risk; my gut says most of these devices can be remotely attacked or, at the minimum, with hardware access, can install software so you can remotely manage the device. With remote device management, you can control the car.
But......If you want to Hack your car or get into CAN-Bus ruckus, comma.ai is a pretty good product. They also do pay you for github code work, I couldn't speak to the value for the work. But I do expect to get paid for a few fixes with the RAV4.
Edit:
I've received my device and got it installed. The device comes with a sort of bootstrapped OS and once connected to WiFi, you can download the OS and have it install. Not much of a Barrier.
The 'Chill Mode' default mode, is only a slightly better manufacture drive assist. When you enable experimental mode, it will detect stop lights/signs, does a lot better.
In either mode, you should be ready to drive; everything makes that clear.
Now that everything is working out-of-box, going to see how they can be hacked, and hopefully find some vulns in the car as well.