Things I regret: Looking at github issues for the open-source self-driving car conversion kit.

Thousands of people use these things on public roads.

https://github.com/commaai/openpilot/issues/34346

22 Acura RDX - steering disables under 45mph · Issue #34346 · commaai/openpilot

Describe the bug Steering is completely disabled below 45mph on release branch. There is no visual warning saying it is disabled, the car just drives in a straight line until it about to go offroad...

GitHub
Candidate for understatement of the year: "This can be a safety issue if a driver is misled into thinking that steering is occurring"

The most damning evidence I've ever seen for "this device is only used by single people":

If you have a passenger they *also* have to be looking at the road or it sets off the "pay attention" alarm.

Or they can put their head on the dashboard.

Honestly the funniest thing I've seen this year. I know it's only mid-January, but still.
you had ONE JOB
@jonty what the actual fuck have you found‽

@jonty it blows my mind that someone sells a device that sticks onto the windscreen, and people plug it into their car's CANbus and let it drive them around.

10,000 users on the roads, and a disclaimer that says "THIS IS ALPHA QUALITY SOFTWARE FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY. THIS IS NOT A PRODUCT. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED."

I'm beginning to think humans were a mistake, let alone computers.

@Floppy @jonty oh god, that's the geohot bollocks isn't it. "Oh self driving isn't hard I don't know what the fuss is about I can do that in a few hundred lines of code"
@Floppy @jonty See when I used a beta build of Finamp so I could get android auto support for my music, there was no way that it could make my truck go careening into a pedestrian. So it's okay for THEM to just say "ymmv it might not work right yet".

@[email protected] I'm increasingly of the opinion that we made a big mistake in coming down from the trees in the first place. @jonty

#hhgg

@Floppy @jonty tbh it only says this in "licensing", and who reads licenses these days?

This should have never been made public, let alone being sold with all these "new low price - it drives your car for $999!". Or at the very least it should have come with huge warnings everywhere telling that using it on public roads is illegal, not this fig leaf of "you are responsible for complying with local laws" buried in "licensing" on GitHub.

On the first glance it seems that if you buy this $1k device from their website, you won't even visit the page that says this disclaimer. "For research purposes only" is only on the GitHub to serve as legal insurance apparently; they're selling the device to regular car owners, as "purpose built to run openpilot", and nowhere on their website does it say that it's "for research purposes". It's as if you would have bought a new car from a car dealership, and it had "only for research purposes" hidden somewhere deep in the EULA.

The creators of this shit should be prosecuted imo.

@Floppy @jonty oh, let's not get started on what humans do behind the wheel
@Floppy @jonty driving and neural networks do not mesh together, no matter how meaty the neural networks are. the fact that meaty neural networks invented railroads during urbanization specifically and then basically forgot to use them should be all the proof we need.

@Floppy @jonty "It blows my mind that..."

...someone sells a car that exposes steering control on CANbus. That's criminally negligent.

It's criminally negligent for the steering wheel not to be rigidly mechanically coupled to the rack and tie rods.