Steven Spielberg said, after he made Schindler's List, that it was partly an apology for portraying Nazis in the Indiana Jones franchise as less evil than they really were. I think Hollywood has been guilty of something far worse in recent decades: portraying Nazis as competent.

Germany wasn't a country run by Nazis that happened to lose the Second World War, it was a country that lost because it was run by Nazis.

Take a look at the names of the folks that worked on the Manhattan Project. See how many of them are German? Several of them worked on weapons in the First World War, for the Germans. Germany had a huge lead in developing a nuclear weapon in the '30s, but removed people who weren't Nazi enough from positions of authority in fields related to weapons research. A load of their best scientists were on the various lists that would end up on death camps and managed to leave (others didn't, and died). When you start by saying 'only people from this arbitrary subset of the population based on race / gender / religion / sexuality / whatever may contribute to our society', you won't get the best people.

Hitler maintained control by promoting people based on their personal loyalty to him, not based on their competence. He ensured communication flowed through him and made parallel agencies compete, directing their effort against each other rather than towards shared goals, to avoid any becoming powerful enough to challenge his power structures.

Hitler was almost responsible for most of the German army being wiped out early on in the Second World War because he had an exaggerated opinion of his own ability. The only reason it wasn't was that allied commanders didn't believe anyone could be that stupid and assumed it was a trap (it wasn't, he really was that stupid). He then decided to invade Russia in the winter (which worked so well for Napoleon) against the advice of any of the people who paid attention in school, which was one of the key turning points in the war.

Don't let the smart uniforms fool you. They were not competent people who lost as a result of circumstances beyond their control. They were people with an ideology that was ultimately self defeating in the long term. And, if people with the same views are in positions of power again, they will fail in the same way. The problem is not that they might succeed, it's that they have a habit of taking a lot of other people with them on their way to defeat.

@david_chisnall @StOnSoftware 🤔

Excerpt:
"… Hitler maintained control by promoting people based on their personal loyalty to him, not based on their competence. He ensured communication flowed through him and made parallel agencies compete, directing their effort against each other rather than towards shared goals, to avoid any becoming powerful enough to challenge his power structures … "

@deborahh @david_chisnall @StOnSoftware Hitler? Who's that? I thought this was about Drumpf and his Cronies MuSSk, etc.....

🤔🤭

@david_chisnall
Great post. The biggest weakness of the far Right is their hubris. They always overreach in the end. At least, that’s what we must pray for this time.

@KimSJ @david_chisnall Hear hear, though we believe we can do more than pray: active resistance, together with open and notorious ideological opposition, will choke out these crooked bigots

Ridicule is a marvelous and free weapon

@KimSJ @david_chisnall sorry, but I think that should read “fight”, not “pray”. Actions, not thoughts, are required.
@david_chisnall …“Hitler was almost responsible for most of the German army being wiped out early on in the Second World War because he had an exaggerated opinion of his own ability“… just out of curiosity, what event is referenced here?
@david_chisnall great post, but The Nazis didn't invade Russia in the winter. The invasion took longer than expected and by the time winter came they were still in the middle of the fight. they thought slavs were inferior and the USSR would just collapse, but they were wrong
@sotneStatue Yeah they invaded in June which was the most earliest month you could possibly get for a summer invasion. And the invasion was necessary economic wise because the Nazi economy would've imploded if they didn't invade in 1941 (they were literally running out of oil), which is again the Nazis' fault.

@david_chisnall
@job @david_chisnall That is why i dont like the comment "Germany would have won the war if they just didn't invade the USSR"
@job @sotneStatue @david_chisnall
My understanding was that they'd intended to go in May but Mussolini's problems in Greece meant they had to delay a month.

@job you've misconstrued the overall plan to topple Russia via the Summer/Autumn invasion of Moscow with the diversion of its original armoured divisions, which were rerouted to take Minsk and then attempt control over the Caucus oil fields. They are related but not so easily simplified in purpose or outcomes.

Still no one mentioned Stalingrad, and I should hope that everyone understands that this horrific meat grinder was the true tipping point which marks the fall of the Third Reich; not the varying levels of competence in middle management, not the Wannsee Conference decision makers, not the focus on stealing Jewish gold to pay for post-war exfiltration transit to South America via the corrupt actions of the Vatican's "Rat Lines"... no, no.

Those were all contributory but it was the near-total destruction of the Wehrmacht eastern divisions (exacerbated by Göring's inability to deliver the Luftwaffe logistical promises for supply lines to ground forces) which occurred in Stalingrad. All because of the name of the city, not for any other reason than Hitler wanting to snub his nose at Stalin - the other dictator who threw his country's population into death and torture and mass murder by the millions. If Stalingrad had not been engaged, the Nazis would not have lost.

But did they really lose? Is anyone wanting to discuss USA's Operation Paperclip, or of Herr Galen being in charge of West Germany's version of our CIA - put into place by the Allied Forces after the war? Or maybe of the shadow government of America ruled by the Dulles Brothers who worked directly with former Nazi command to staff the opposition to communism in East Germany post-ww2...

> the Gehlen Organization. This organization, established in June 1946, was headed by Reinhard Gehlen, a former Wehrmacht Major General and head of Nazi German military intelligence on the Eastern Front during World War II. Gehlen recruited former SS and Wehrmacht officers to form the Gehlen Organization, which worked closely with the CIA from its founding.

It was not just about oil. It was not about Jews, or persecution of dissidents, or the original tenants of the NSDAP ideology, it was not a catch phrase capable sequence of events which originated an entire century prior to the events of that war.

Everyone wants a simple analogy from WW2 to modern times, but there isn't one. Stop focusing on the Nazis from WW2 - no one learned a damn thing from it so it's not a useful source of simple truths.

But if you must, if you have to summarize anything.. it's that the war never ended. We are still fighting and we can never stop. Peaceful existence on a global scale is a lovely dream, but it is impossible.

@sotneStatue @david_chisnall

@winterschon Yes the namesake of Stalingrad was a factor, but please do not pretend that was the only reason why the Wehrmacht laid siege to the city. It was the largest industrial center and an important transport hub, and the Germans needed Stalingrad to fully control the Caucasus where the oil is. Not bothering with Stalingrad would've meant a quicker German defeat in the battlefield.

It's also questionable whether the Soviets would've capitulated if Moscow fell. Yes it is an important supply hub like Stalingrad and is the literal capital, but the Soviets already made preparations for such an event by evacuating a lot of their industry to the east. If Moscow was the main goal then the race for the Caucasus wouldn't have happened. But he wasn't too naive like his most of his generals were who kept wanting to attack despite not having the supplies to achieve their goals.

Regardless I still believe it was inevitable that the Nazis would've lost in the battlefield. The Germans were still literally relying on horses for their logistics while the Allies have mostly ditched them in Europe and motorized their supplies by the end of the war. Hitler knew logistics was going to be the decisive factor, and when he didn't get the quick capitulation he wanted from the USSR by cutting off their oil, it was basically over.

@sotneStatue @david_chisnall
@winterschon Also pretty amusing you say that the southward advance was a diversion when it was pretty much the opposite. Moscow was the diversion. The Soviets logically guessed that the Nazis would go for the oil fields first, and one of Hitler's generals fortunately (or unfortunately I guess because it meant a longer war) anticipated this and revised the plan to include Moscow prior to Operation Barbarossa.

@david_chisnall @sotneStatue

@job Wonderful response, and I appreciate the timeline details... do you recall which general adapted the logistics prior to Barbarossa being executed?

@sotneStatue @david_chisnall

@winterschon It was Gen. Halder IIRC who pushed for Moscow to be included in the operation

@sotneStatue @david_chisnall
@sotneStatue @david_chisnall Had they treated the Slavs half decently, they could have had Ukraine on their side against Stalin. Instead they pissed everyone off and soon had partisans everywhere. Albert Speer talks about this in his book. In the early years he drove around Ukraine in an official car with no security. Later on nothing moved without a military escort.
@david_chisnall The harm of Hollywood, intentional or not, is that in order to justify how good the American army was, you have to praise your enemy at the same time. You can't say, you are the best army in the world if your enemy is useless and you won almost by accident.

@maxxcan @david_chisnall You have to differentiate between the Germans and the Nazis. The Germans were very smart, capable, and great soldiers. The Nazis were a glorified street gang that made piss-poor use of the capabilities they inherited.

Germans seem to be great at war as long as they are led by someone else. Led by their own, they screw up and lose.

@mike805 @david_chisnall in my country we say that military intelligence does not exist. And I don't know of any military that is good.
@david_chisnall Also, dictatorship isn't more efficient than democracy as too many people believe.
Our big problems aren't solved by a strong leader. They are solved by more democracy.
@david_chisnall If #Nazis are stupid, what does that say about the people who vote for them?

@david_chisnall Karl Popper nailed it when he highlighted the inherent irrationality of "closed" (authoritarian or totalitarian) systems of governance: in refusing to acknowledge their own fallibility, and dismissing actual experts for not being subservient enough to the cause, tyrants and their sycophants become increasingly bogged down in managing the unintended consequences of their own bad decisions. The inevitable result is the implosion of their regimes.

So resistence is never futile!

@david_chisnall like the scene (if I recall correctly) where the structural engineer explains how they are fucking up the building in the camp and presents her credentials. Then gets murdered.

@david_chisnall This. 1000%

Blinded by racism, misogyny, and ethnocentrism, they exiled or killed many of their best and brightest.

@david_chisnall

Furiously agreed.
"Totalitarianism in power invariably replaces all first-rate talents, regardless of their sympathies, with those crackpots and fools whose lack of intelligence and creativity is still the best guarantee of their loyalty." Hannah Arendt "The Origins of Totalitarianism"

@david_chisnall They put "Old Fighters" - SA thugs from the Kampfzeit era - in charge of things they had no idea how to run properly. They also failed to fund long term research on things like radar, guided missiles, and computers, because the war was only going to last six months.

Hermann Goering was a drug-addled idiot who harmed the German cause twice, at Dunkirk (where he thought his air force could wipe out the Brits) and at Stalingrad (wildly over promised what he could deliver by air.)

@david_chisnall
I know this is completely besides the point, but which episode are you thinking of here?

'Hitler was almost responsible for most of the German army being wiped out early on in the Second World War because he had an exaggerated opinion of his own ability'

@david_chisnall My mom told us that her dad lighted his last cigar (this was in occupied the Netherlands), when he heard that Hitler had started the invasion of the USSR. He knew his history 😉
@david_chisnall I love the explanation in the Wolfenstein games for the Nazi's superiority in this fictional world: Stolen Jewish technology.
@david_chisnall
Plus, there was a huge amount of empire-building by individual senior figures, which is inefficient and wasteful and causes friction and conflicts of interest and the like. Now that always happens in big organisations, yes, but IIUC Hitler actually encouraged it, because if they were fighting each other they weren't plotting against him.
@david_chisnall Worth noting that a big reason the Nazi bomb project never went anywhere was because Heisenberg (who hated the idea of the bomb) convinced the military that it was impractical and as the rockstar among remaining German physicists drew the best to his project developing nuclear power. The bomb project wasn't led by even the 2nd string of German physics, but by the loyal Aryan dregs.

@david_chisnall
This is why I love how Nazis are portrayed in movies like The Producers and Jojo Rabbit.

Mussolini didn't make the trains run on time, if anything, he made the rail system worse. Hitler's economy was basically a Ponzi scheme that needed to steal more and more or else it would collapse in on itself. Nazis were and still are a fucking joke - that's how they should be depicted in media.

@david_chisnall
Worth adding: I hate when Nazi scientists, especially their medical scientists, are depicted as brilliant people who made incredible discoveries once they were unconstrained by ethics.

They were fucking garbage. Their research was almost completely unusable.

@jargoggles @david_chisnall

At some point, the financial sector will clue in, it may be around the time gas prices spike: https://inaniludibrio.com/2024/07/17/moral-economic-calculations/

Moral & Economic Calculations

The German stock market experienced a significant decline during the period from 1933 to 1945, primarily due to the economic policies and interventions of the Nazi regime. Here are key points about…

Inani Ludibrio
@david_chisnall it’s always fun to watch libertarian experiments fail miserably - except when you’re unwillingly part of that experiment
@david_chisnall
But he managed to kill a shitload of people before the incompetence caught up.
@david_chisnall I often think this. Competence is very hard and requires good character traits--diligence, self-honesty, clear seeing, patience, humility--which you simply don't find in people who are content to view the world in distorted and lazy ways, and who lack the self-control to behave decently. Let alone actual Nazis! In short, competent people don't tend to shitpost heartless memes on X in the middle of the night.

@david_chisnall Remarks:

  • The German economy in WW2 was extremely inefficient and riddled by corruption. Schindler used this to save people.
  • At some point the allies thought they could kill Hitler. They decided against it as his leadership was considered detrimental.