I'm nearing a year of using this Linux laptop as a 50% daily driver and I really have to say…

Linux's quality of life on an ordinary laptop is *embarrassing*.

Like, I'm able to use it. But it is embarrassing. No normal person would put up with the garbage desktop Linux puts me through. I put up with it because I'm stubborn and ideologically motivated.

I see problems including, but not limited to

- When I close the laptop lid and open it again, a shocking percentage of the time it does not wake up and I have to force power it off ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem-6.8/+bug/2064595 , ongoing since April)
- Every time I briefly brush my fingers against the screen, GNOME enters an entirely broken "touchscreen mode" in which it pretends my keyboard and mouse don't exist. It fixes itself after an unpredictable amount of time ranging from 5 to 30 seconds. Can't be disabled

Bug #2064595 “AMD Rembrandt & AMD Rembrandt-R: Suspend hangs sys...” : Bugs : linux-oem-6.8 package : Ubuntu

[Impact] On some OEM platforms observed bad suspend occurs on lid close and power LED stays on without normal sleep behavior at that time. Needs to call GFXOFF to the right state during the suspend stage. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/ca299b4512d4b4f516732a48ce9aa19d91f4473e Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3132 Fixes: ab4750332dbe [Test case] test that s2idle works after installing the update [Regression potential] minimal

Launchpad

- Firefox can't show image previews when selecting attachments (because of "security", somehow)

- Often, when I direct a program to open a new window, GNOME refuses to let the program do it, and instead opens the window at the back of the stack and shows a top-of-screen notification letting me know there's a new window (I guess also "security")

- Just fresh weird stuff happening at random intervals. Since last week, when I right click in Firefox, I can't click on the menu. It's happening RN

I can use even a very poorly functioning OS because the OS, to me, is just a thin support system that allows a web browser to run. Linux is not succeeding well at this very minimal goal.
Note: I assume that I will get responses to these posts (okay, I was GOING to say that, but I have got two such responses so far, I didn't even get to finish typing the thread) saying I wouldn't have problems if I didn't use Ubuntu. *I don't believe you!* Using a different distro means yanking an arm on a slot machine. MAYBE I get a functioning system. MAYBE it gets worse! And the cost of *trying* is a few days of intensive work and maybe screwing up my daily-use computer.
Someday Cosmic DE will get released, and I will switch to Pop!_OS, and then all the problems on my laptop will be because Cosmic DE is an unfinished product rather than because GNOME is a finished product which made design decisions I disagree with, and I will be Happy because the problems with my laptop will be happening for the correct reasons
Note: I don't mind Snap. I'd rather my OS be using Flatpak, but I mostly use Snap on purpose and I don't specifically object to my applications being installed as Snap. I just want Snap/Flatpak to like… work right.

@mcc > I just want Snap/Flatpak to like… work right.

That would be a huge improvement in my experience.

@mcc I agree that as an end user you shouldn't have to care about the philosophy of native v/s namespace v/s whatever snap does, you should just be able to trust the OS default to JustWork(tm).

but this is kind of why I have been against this whole snap and flatpak business. I trust my distro, and by extension, the native packages the maintainers have put in the repos to work well in concert with each other.

@double_a_runi Well, my experience is that the distro maintainers are very, very conservative and always have very old versions of things, and that Homebrew is very high quality and always has new versions of things, so I'm in principle interested in a software distribution system that looks more like Homebrew than apt

@mcc wait we have brew on Linux?

anyway yeah, you are describing why I slowly moved from ubuntu -> mint -> arch . ubuntu got annoying, and mint packages were always old. I know arch is a meme, but its been working for me, and I will move to something else when it stops working for me?

@double_a_runi I was using OS X locally and linux only on servers until quite recently! Then I rapidly abandoned Mac for Windows and then rapidly abandoned Windows for Linux.

But also, yeah, you can use Homebrew on Linux, if you're feeling adventurous… https://docs.brew.sh/Homebrew-on-Linux

Homebrew on Linux

Documentation for the missing package manager for macOS (or Linux).

Homebrew Documentation

@mcc curl to bash to install, looks promising.

sorry I have nothing useful to reply, I've used brew to install lima on macos, so I can have linux in there, but not beyond that. I don't know how it works, and what kind of conflicts it can have.

@mcc Similarly you can use Pkgsrc on Linux but I don't know how adventurous that will turn out to be. Probably there will be more compile-from-source than some other options.

@mcc if you prefer newer versions, you may want to try Arch (or Endeavour OS, which is basically Arch, but with a more user-friendly installation process, and even more shiny new things). In the last couple of years, I barely did any maintenance to make it work for me, and I'm on Wayland and all.

Also, in my experience, KDE is much more sensible than Gnome. I love it. It's still nice even when compared to OS X, and a lot better than Windows 11.

@wienski @mcc I've always found KDE a better environment than GNOME, just because the GNOME devs have very particular opinions about things, which differ from my own, and which they over time keep removing the ability to change.

@mcc @double_a_runi apologies if you already know this: ubuntu cuts from debian's "testing" repositories twice a year (for 04 and 10), and packages aren't really updated beyond that except for browsers and a few other bits.

distros with "fresher" packages exist: fedora is great for this, it has a solid testing process too before packages hit live.

ubuntu (and debian) have a long history of... kinda hacking packages up a bit. debian does it predominantly to split them out, ubuntu adds more to do "ubuntu-centric" things to them sometimes. occasionally this collides with upstream a bit.

like with package age, distros with "more vanilla" packages exist (again, fedora, incidentally).

@mcc @double_a_runi

Bluefin and Aurora have Homebrew well integrated

@double_a_runi @mcc It might be worth pointing out that Snap is the result of more than a decade of on-and-off work by the package maintainers you trust.

Like, “we need to develop something like Snap” was a topic at one of the first Ubuntu Developers' Summit I attended (back when those were big 6 monthly community events).

Snap and Flatpak are not some weird technology imposed on distro maintainers from outside. They are distro maintainer technology, built by distro maintainers to solve problems that distro maintainers have¹!

¹: And, by extension, solve problems that users have.

@RAOF Or create problems for users that they otherwise wouldn't have, like no longer being able to upload files from where they happen to be stored.
@wollman Absolutely! This is one of the reasons it's taken more than a decade from “we should do this” to “this is a thing that substantially exists”.
@wollman @RAOF Having the snap app run in a container will do that.

@RAOF @double_a_runi @mcc regardless of this being true or not, snap and flatpak are *horrifically* bad experiences much of the time (not least of which is due to seriously janky CLI and UI to manage them), and really should not be pushed so heavily.

I quite like the concept. It's important.
The implementations are an absurd travesty.

@mcc Snaps gave me soooo many problems in 2018 that I stopped using Ubuntu. It was a "Vista" moment for me.

IME I don't have problems with Flatpaks but I don't use them often either

@mcc I try not to use snap because got tired of path and config issues, and that there's no easy way to remove cache or old installs, it can quickly fill a drive.

My experience with Linux desktop is similar to windows nowadays in terms of time invested in removing bloat and configure tools, and cursing the system due to crashes (I don't have access to freshly new hardware so whatever I get has some years of testing and fixes on top)

@mcc This has been my experience, too, with moving back to Linux as a daily driver after a decade away. So many things that either have not improved or have gotten noticeably worse, it's truly boggling. If I were less experienced with diagnosing and addressing these things, it would be a complete non starter.
@mcc all of this is so real. I drive linux exclusively and I won't pretend this isn't valid, or that it'll be fixed if you just do something different. It's completely worth it to me because it makes my brain happy and I am also stubborn and ideologically motivated lol

@mcc A lot of this sounds like problems with the desktop environment rather than Linux itself, granted that it's hard to distinguish for new users definitely, but you might try with KDE.

I'm running Kubuntu on my laptop, under the hood it's the same as Ubuntu, but it's kitted out with KDE as my desktop and haven't seen these issues.

@mcc are you attached to gnome, because if not, I would suggest a more consistent DE? (I know I just apologized for replies like this, but gnome is especially pesky in my experience. I have to deal with gnome on my office workstation, and I hate it)

@double_a_runi I am very picky about margins on interface elements and IMO the ones in GNOME are Good and the ones in KDE and FVWM are Bad . Despite this I may switch to KDE at some point simply because I very much like Qt.

My current plan is to shelter in place until Cosmic lands (see post elsewhere in thread) and if I'm already doing that then switching to Kubuntu only to quickly tear it down again is not a good use of time.

@mcc @double_a_runi You can install multiple DE/WM and swap between them to try them out without installing a new OS. This command offers the basic options, but there are more:

sudo tasksel

At the login prompt when booting up, there is probably a drop-down somewhere to choose which of the installed options you want to boot into this time.

@mcc @double_a_runi
I find KDE nice in general, and it's also quite customisable - perhaps you can get margins in KDE to your liking.

@mcc

COSMIC will naturally take some time to mature as a new project, so perhaps it won't be a waste of time to install Kubuntu until that happens.

Despite using openSUSE Tumbleweed, I do think that Kubuntu is a rather good KDE distro to pick. However with some of your issues, you may want to look into installing the native DEB or Flatpak Firefox package instead.

@mcc That's fair. I use Ubuntu because I wanted deb. I didn't want Snaps. It says there's an update then can't find it. I lose things a lot. I certainly don't want help with that.

@mcc I didn't see it in the thread, but what laptop are you using?

(Not that it's relevant to your case, but I've used Ubuntu on Thinkpads -- never, ever the latest model, however -- for a long time with good results.)

@dangillmor @mcc I'm running Linux on a Lenovo Carbon X1 and maybe one time out of five if I sleep it when not connected to external power/monitor, it won't wake up and I have to power-cycle. I've been assuming it's a Lenovo problem; I've been happily using desktop/laptop Linux for a quarter century (though not with gnome or wayland) and all the non-Lenovo machines could wake up reliably.
@akkana @dangillmor There was a regression in the 6.8.x kernel series somewhere around April and that's what's causing me problems now.
@akkana @dangillmor But ofc sleep/wake problems can have lots of causes and show up in a lot of OSes/configurations, some people seem to have problems with this even on Windows. I have learned the root problem is something called "S0ix", but apparently S0ix chipsets are all you can buy now
@mcc @akkana @dangillmor not sure how this works on ubuntu but usually it's not a problem to install an older but still supported kernel alongside your default kernel. This would be 6.6 at the moment I think
@rustynail I'm still on 6.5 (in 22.04.4) @mcc @akkana
@dangillmor @mcc @akkana I actually tried looking up how to install an LTS kernel on ubuntu and it's either that search is so polluted by "ubuntu lts" mentions or just old garbage news about new kernels being available on ubuntu or there really is no easy way to do it, seems really weird for the most popular distro since regressions are not super uncommon. The worst part is that it's ubuntu lts that it's using newer kernel so there really is no going back unless it's two whole years
@dangillmor @mcc @akkana actually my last sentence here doesn't make any sense now that i think of it. But anyway, going to the previous version of an entire distro seems unacceptable
@rustynail @dangillmor @mcc
I'm on 6.9.8. I'll have to pay attention to whether unplugged wakeup gets more reliable. It got really bad maybe 6-8 months ago, but I'm not sure what the kernel version was then. I use this laptop mostly docked (I go to a lot fewer in-person meetings since COVID when remote meetings became an option) and when it's plugged in to AC it almost always resumes correctly.

@dangillmor Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 3 (AMD). I specifically selected this machine for Linux compatibiliy… >_>

I think that my most serious problems stem from:

- Using newest versions of Ubuntu instead of 22.04
- Third parties having poor support for HiDPI and high resolution scrollwheel events
- Me trying (at first, not now) to use Wayland
- Intentional features of Snap, and my refusal to use non-Snap methods of installing software when a Snap is available

@mcc @dangillmor I was also surprised at how volatile Ubuntu 24.04 seemed to me on Framework 16. It feels like LTS really needs to age for a year or two before its fully stable :D

@levlaz @dangillmor Yeah. I … didn't expect this to be the case. "Well of course you don't install LTS until it hits .1" is apparently common knowledge in the Linux desktop community but was not common knowledge to me.

LTS: "Long term support but NOT short term support"???

@mcc @levlaz @dangillmor Funny enough this is outright baked in at the *upgrade* level, LTS installs don't get upgrade notifications or even offers until the .1

Which really raises the question of why the general public is encouraged to install it fresh before then!
@keithzg @levlaz @dangillmor @mcc
Well, someone's got to find the bugs, right?
@mcc @dangillmor I wonder if Fedora is any better (I officially gave up on Linux as a workstation OS a couple years ago)
@anemone @dangillmor I wonder this as well. But ofc I'm annoyed at IBM about GPL compliance :(

@mcc Yeah, I'm cautious about using the latest OS if I have a choice. I'll probably wait for 24.04.2 before I upgrade Ubuntu on my primary machine (and will do a clean install).

Also yeah re screen resolution stuff, not ideal (though I mostly use the machine in clamshell mode with big external monitor).

I like/hate Snaps and Flatpacks and even .deb but wish the ecosystem would settle on something and stick with it.

If you ever have to use the command line, an OS is not for "regular" folks.

@dangillmor @mcc

> If you ever have to use the command line, an OS is not for "regular" folks.

Hmm. I'm old enough to remember when Windows users used the command line too. Regular folks did that. (I am quite old, though.) And later plenty of Windows "how to" guides would tell you to do it, or worse, screw with the registry. Isn't that still a thing?

Perhaps you're right; I don't know. Maybe those guides aren't for "regular" Windows users.

Except -- "regular"? All users are different...

@fishidwardrobe @dangillmor @mcc Macintosh came out in 1984 and demonstrated, then, 40(!!!) years ago, that the command line was not necessary to run a computer. If the Linux community hasn't internalized that learning in FORTY YEARS than they deserve to be roundly mocked for it, in my opinion.

"Regular folks" did that, ever, because they didn't have a choice, not because they enjoyed it.

@blakeyrat @dangillmor @mcc You're free to speak for yourself, of course -- just as I did. We don't have to agree.
@fishidwardrobe @blakeyrat @dangillmor What I'd say, as I've mostly been using Windows 10 lately, is that Windows does often require you to use the command line and/or registry editor, and I'd say this is very embarrassing. I think Windows is falling down in this respect.

@mcc @fishidwardrobe @dangillmor It's no stretch to convince me Windows is getting worse over time. All software companies seem to have just given up on the entire concept of QA.

I've never had to use the registry editor or CLI in Windows, though, so maybe you have to "often" do it, but I think you're an outlier there frankly.

@blakeyrat @fishidwardrobe @dangillmor I've found it to be necessary if, for example, you want to turn off forced product tying like Bing or OneDrive. So if you're right that I'm an outlier for "often" needing to do it, then I'm an outlier for not having all my start menu searches sent to Microsoft. And if that's true I think it would be sad.
@mcc @fishidwardrobe @dangillmor But that's stuff you *want* to do, not *have* to do, and yes I'm a pedantic asshole, sorry in advance. The way I look at it is I get Windows for free, and that's the price you pay for it. It's a trade-off I feel is worth it.

@blakeyrat @mcc @fishidwardrobe @dangillmor you don’t get it for free though. even if it comes with your device, manufacturers pay microsoft licensing fees to include it by default, which drives up the cost of their devices.

and even if that weren’t the case, i strongly disagree with allowing that to simply be the “price you pay,” when it comes with all sorts of social ills

@blakeyrat @mcc @dangillmor Speaking personally I find there is a large gap between "I found it neccessary to do X" and "I wanted to do X". Not at all the same thing.

Nor am I sure you are getting Windows for free in any real sense, unless off Pirate Bay?

Just my POV; don't know that MCC would agree.

@fishidwardrobe @mcc @dangillmor You're out-of-date, Windows is free-free now, you can just download the ISO. IIRC the only difference between that and a "licensed" version is it puts a little watermark on the wallpaper.
@blakeyrat @fishidwardrobe @dangillmor I would consider it a requirement, not a "nice-to-have", that a corporation not surveil me while I am using my personal computer. This is why I have switched to Linux in the first place (because I have seen the future and it is "Recall").
@mcc @blakeyrat @dangillmor I'd certainly agree that Windows is trying to make it so you don't use the command line. Rightly or wrongly.
@mcc @dangillmor Appreciate the attempt at getting to root causes to ideally resolve the issues. Hope it works out for you as someone who just reached my 1-yr anniversary of Linux as my daily driver. I've had my fair share of frustrating experiences as well and realized that the desktop environment and the graphical display system are two very large contributing factors that are hard to fully account for re: troubleshooting. Things are much more positive than negative nowadays and I will never pay for an OS again, but the initial learning curve can be brutal

@mcc Sorry you're experiencing all this. Luckily you didn't get any "patches welcome" response...

That some people still "don't understand" why folks keep using Windows or macOS is astonishing.

@astrojuanlu I think that my sleep problem MIGHT be fixed in a top of tree kernel but the information about which kernel I'd need to get or how to do it without disrupting my existing Linux system is… inadequate