I'm nearing a year of using this Linux laptop as a 50% daily driver and I really have to say…

Linux's quality of life on an ordinary laptop is *embarrassing*.

Like, I'm able to use it. But it is embarrassing. No normal person would put up with the garbage desktop Linux puts me through. I put up with it because I'm stubborn and ideologically motivated.

I see problems including, but not limited to

- When I close the laptop lid and open it again, a shocking percentage of the time it does not wake up and I have to force power it off ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem-6.8/+bug/2064595 , ongoing since April)
- Every time I briefly brush my fingers against the screen, GNOME enters an entirely broken "touchscreen mode" in which it pretends my keyboard and mouse don't exist. It fixes itself after an unpredictable amount of time ranging from 5 to 30 seconds. Can't be disabled

Bug #2064595 “AMD Rembrandt & AMD Rembrandt-R: Suspend hangs sys...” : Bugs : linux-oem-6.8 package : Ubuntu

[Impact] On some OEM platforms observed bad suspend occurs on lid close and power LED stays on without normal sleep behavior at that time. Needs to call GFXOFF to the right state during the suspend stage. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/ca299b4512d4b4f516732a48ce9aa19d91f4473e Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3132 Fixes: ab4750332dbe [Test case] test that s2idle works after installing the update [Regression potential] minimal

Launchpad

- Firefox can't show image previews when selecting attachments (because of "security", somehow)

- Often, when I direct a program to open a new window, GNOME refuses to let the program do it, and instead opens the window at the back of the stack and shows a top-of-screen notification letting me know there's a new window (I guess also "security")

- Just fresh weird stuff happening at random intervals. Since last week, when I right click in Firefox, I can't click on the menu. It's happening RN

I can use even a very poorly functioning OS because the OS, to me, is just a thin support system that allows a web browser to run. Linux is not succeeding well at this very minimal goal.
Note: I assume that I will get responses to these posts (okay, I was GOING to say that, but I have got two such responses so far, I didn't even get to finish typing the thread) saying I wouldn't have problems if I didn't use Ubuntu. *I don't believe you!* Using a different distro means yanking an arm on a slot machine. MAYBE I get a functioning system. MAYBE it gets worse! And the cost of *trying* is a few days of intensive work and maybe screwing up my daily-use computer.
Someday Cosmic DE will get released, and I will switch to Pop!_OS, and then all the problems on my laptop will be because Cosmic DE is an unfinished product rather than because GNOME is a finished product which made design decisions I disagree with, and I will be Happy because the problems with my laptop will be happening for the correct reasons
Note: I don't mind Snap. I'd rather my OS be using Flatpak, but I mostly use Snap on purpose and I don't specifically object to my applications being installed as Snap. I just want Snap/Flatpak to like… work right.

@mcc > I just want Snap/Flatpak to like… work right.

That would be a huge improvement in my experience.

@mcc I agree that as an end user you shouldn't have to care about the philosophy of native v/s namespace v/s whatever snap does, you should just be able to trust the OS default to JustWork(tm).

but this is kind of why I have been against this whole snap and flatpak business. I trust my distro, and by extension, the native packages the maintainers have put in the repos to work well in concert with each other.

@double_a_runi Well, my experience is that the distro maintainers are very, very conservative and always have very old versions of things, and that Homebrew is very high quality and always has new versions of things, so I'm in principle interested in a software distribution system that looks more like Homebrew than apt

@mcc wait we have brew on Linux?

anyway yeah, you are describing why I slowly moved from ubuntu -> mint -> arch . ubuntu got annoying, and mint packages were always old. I know arch is a meme, but its been working for me, and I will move to something else when it stops working for me?

@double_a_runi I was using OS X locally and linux only on servers until quite recently! Then I rapidly abandoned Mac for Windows and then rapidly abandoned Windows for Linux.

But also, yeah, you can use Homebrew on Linux, if you're feeling adventurous… https://docs.brew.sh/Homebrew-on-Linux

Homebrew on Linux

Documentation for the missing package manager for macOS (or Linux).

Homebrew Documentation

@mcc curl to bash to install, looks promising.

sorry I have nothing useful to reply, I've used brew to install lima on macos, so I can have linux in there, but not beyond that. I don't know how it works, and what kind of conflicts it can have.

@mcc Similarly you can use Pkgsrc on Linux but I don't know how adventurous that will turn out to be. Probably there will be more compile-from-source than some other options.

@mcc if you prefer newer versions, you may want to try Arch (or Endeavour OS, which is basically Arch, but with a more user-friendly installation process, and even more shiny new things). In the last couple of years, I barely did any maintenance to make it work for me, and I'm on Wayland and all.

Also, in my experience, KDE is much more sensible than Gnome. I love it. It's still nice even when compared to OS X, and a lot better than Windows 11.

@wienski @mcc I've always found KDE a better environment than GNOME, just because the GNOME devs have very particular opinions about things, which differ from my own, and which they over time keep removing the ability to change.

@mcc @double_a_runi apologies if you already know this: ubuntu cuts from debian's "testing" repositories twice a year (for 04 and 10), and packages aren't really updated beyond that except for browsers and a few other bits.

distros with "fresher" packages exist: fedora is great for this, it has a solid testing process too before packages hit live.

ubuntu (and debian) have a long history of... kinda hacking packages up a bit. debian does it predominantly to split them out, ubuntu adds more to do "ubuntu-centric" things to them sometimes. occasionally this collides with upstream a bit.

like with package age, distros with "more vanilla" packages exist (again, fedora, incidentally).

@mcc @double_a_runi

Bluefin and Aurora have Homebrew well integrated

@double_a_runi @mcc It might be worth pointing out that Snap is the result of more than a decade of on-and-off work by the package maintainers you trust.

Like, “we need to develop something like Snap” was a topic at one of the first Ubuntu Developers' Summit I attended (back when those were big 6 monthly community events).

Snap and Flatpak are not some weird technology imposed on distro maintainers from outside. They are distro maintainer technology, built by distro maintainers to solve problems that distro maintainers have¹!

¹: And, by extension, solve problems that users have.

@RAOF Or create problems for users that they otherwise wouldn't have, like no longer being able to upload files from where they happen to be stored.
@wollman Absolutely! This is one of the reasons it's taken more than a decade from “we should do this” to “this is a thing that substantially exists”.
@wollman @RAOF Having the snap app run in a container will do that.

@RAOF @double_a_runi @mcc regardless of this being true or not, snap and flatpak are *horrifically* bad experiences much of the time (not least of which is due to seriously janky CLI and UI to manage them), and really should not be pushed so heavily.

I quite like the concept. It's important.
The implementations are an absurd travesty.

@mcc Snaps gave me soooo many problems in 2018 that I stopped using Ubuntu. It was a "Vista" moment for me.

IME I don't have problems with Flatpaks but I don't use them often either

@mcc I try not to use snap because got tired of path and config issues, and that there's no easy way to remove cache or old installs, it can quickly fill a drive.

My experience with Linux desktop is similar to windows nowadays in terms of time invested in removing bloat and configure tools, and cursing the system due to crashes (I don't have access to freshly new hardware so whatever I get has some years of testing and fixes on top)

@mcc This has been my experience, too, with moving back to Linux as a daily driver after a decade away. So many things that either have not improved or have gotten noticeably worse, it's truly boggling. If I were less experienced with diagnosing and addressing these things, it would be a complete non starter.
@mcc all of this is so real. I drive linux exclusively and I won't pretend this isn't valid, or that it'll be fixed if you just do something different. It's completely worth it to me because it makes my brain happy and I am also stubborn and ideologically motivated lol

@mcc A lot of this sounds like problems with the desktop environment rather than Linux itself, granted that it's hard to distinguish for new users definitely, but you might try with KDE.

I'm running Kubuntu on my laptop, under the hood it's the same as Ubuntu, but it's kitted out with KDE as my desktop and haven't seen these issues.