I'm nearing a year of using this Linux laptop as a 50% daily driver and I really have to say…

Linux's quality of life on an ordinary laptop is *embarrassing*.

Like, I'm able to use it. But it is embarrassing. No normal person would put up with the garbage desktop Linux puts me through. I put up with it because I'm stubborn and ideologically motivated.

I see problems including, but not limited to

- When I close the laptop lid and open it again, a shocking percentage of the time it does not wake up and I have to force power it off ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem-6.8/+bug/2064595 , ongoing since April)
- Every time I briefly brush my fingers against the screen, GNOME enters an entirely broken "touchscreen mode" in which it pretends my keyboard and mouse don't exist. It fixes itself after an unpredictable amount of time ranging from 5 to 30 seconds. Can't be disabled

Bug #2064595 “AMD Rembrandt & AMD Rembrandt-R: Suspend hangs sys...” : Bugs : linux-oem-6.8 package : Ubuntu

[Impact] On some OEM platforms observed bad suspend occurs on lid close and power LED stays on without normal sleep behavior at that time. Needs to call GFXOFF to the right state during the suspend stage. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/ca299b4512d4b4f516732a48ce9aa19d91f4473e Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3132 Fixes: ab4750332dbe [Test case] test that s2idle works after installing the update [Regression potential] minimal

Launchpad

- Firefox can't show image previews when selecting attachments (because of "security", somehow)

- Often, when I direct a program to open a new window, GNOME refuses to let the program do it, and instead opens the window at the back of the stack and shows a top-of-screen notification letting me know there's a new window (I guess also "security")

- Just fresh weird stuff happening at random intervals. Since last week, when I right click in Firefox, I can't click on the menu. It's happening RN

I can use even a very poorly functioning OS because the OS, to me, is just a thin support system that allows a web browser to run. Linux is not succeeding well at this very minimal goal.
Note: I assume that I will get responses to these posts (okay, I was GOING to say that, but I have got two such responses so far, I didn't even get to finish typing the thread) saying I wouldn't have problems if I didn't use Ubuntu. *I don't believe you!* Using a different distro means yanking an arm on a slot machine. MAYBE I get a functioning system. MAYBE it gets worse! And the cost of *trying* is a few days of intensive work and maybe screwing up my daily-use computer.
Someday Cosmic DE will get released, and I will switch to Pop!_OS, and then all the problems on my laptop will be because Cosmic DE is an unfinished product rather than because GNOME is a finished product which made design decisions I disagree with, and I will be Happy because the problems with my laptop will be happening for the correct reasons

@mcc I didn't see it in the thread, but what laptop are you using?

(Not that it's relevant to your case, but I've used Ubuntu on Thinkpads -- never, ever the latest model, however -- for a long time with good results.)

@dangillmor Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 3 (AMD). I specifically selected this machine for Linux compatibiliy… >_>

I think that my most serious problems stem from:

- Using newest versions of Ubuntu instead of 22.04
- Third parties having poor support for HiDPI and high resolution scrollwheel events
- Me trying (at first, not now) to use Wayland
- Intentional features of Snap, and my refusal to use non-Snap methods of installing software when a Snap is available

@mcc @dangillmor I was also surprised at how volatile Ubuntu 24.04 seemed to me on Framework 16. It feels like LTS really needs to age for a year or two before its fully stable :D

@levlaz @dangillmor Yeah. I … didn't expect this to be the case. "Well of course you don't install LTS until it hits .1" is apparently common knowledge in the Linux desktop community but was not common knowledge to me.

LTS: "Long term support but NOT short term support"???

@mcc @levlaz @dangillmor Funny enough this is outright baked in at the *upgrade* level, LTS installs don't get upgrade notifications or even offers until the .1

Which really raises the question of why the general public is encouraged to install it fresh before then!
@keithzg @levlaz @dangillmor @mcc
Well, someone's got to find the bugs, right?
@mcc @dangillmor I wonder if Fedora is any better (I officially gave up on Linux as a workstation OS a couple years ago)
@anemone @dangillmor I wonder this as well. But ofc I'm annoyed at IBM about GPL compliance :(

@mcc Yeah, I'm cautious about using the latest OS if I have a choice. I'll probably wait for 24.04.2 before I upgrade Ubuntu on my primary machine (and will do a clean install).

Also yeah re screen resolution stuff, not ideal (though I mostly use the machine in clamshell mode with big external monitor).

I like/hate Snaps and Flatpacks and even .deb but wish the ecosystem would settle on something and stick with it.

If you ever have to use the command line, an OS is not for "regular" folks.

@dangillmor @mcc

> If you ever have to use the command line, an OS is not for "regular" folks.

Hmm. I'm old enough to remember when Windows users used the command line too. Regular folks did that. (I am quite old, though.) And later plenty of Windows "how to" guides would tell you to do it, or worse, screw with the registry. Isn't that still a thing?

Perhaps you're right; I don't know. Maybe those guides aren't for "regular" Windows users.

Except -- "regular"? All users are different...

@fishidwardrobe @dangillmor @mcc Macintosh came out in 1984 and demonstrated, then, 40(!!!) years ago, that the command line was not necessary to run a computer. If the Linux community hasn't internalized that learning in FORTY YEARS than they deserve to be roundly mocked for it, in my opinion.

"Regular folks" did that, ever, because they didn't have a choice, not because they enjoyed it.

@blakeyrat @dangillmor @mcc You're free to speak for yourself, of course -- just as I did. We don't have to agree.
@fishidwardrobe @blakeyrat @dangillmor What I'd say, as I've mostly been using Windows 10 lately, is that Windows does often require you to use the command line and/or registry editor, and I'd say this is very embarrassing. I think Windows is falling down in this respect.

@mcc @fishidwardrobe @dangillmor It's no stretch to convince me Windows is getting worse over time. All software companies seem to have just given up on the entire concept of QA.

I've never had to use the registry editor or CLI in Windows, though, so maybe you have to "often" do it, but I think you're an outlier there frankly.

@blakeyrat @fishidwardrobe @dangillmor I've found it to be necessary if, for example, you want to turn off forced product tying like Bing or OneDrive. So if you're right that I'm an outlier for "often" needing to do it, then I'm an outlier for not having all my start menu searches sent to Microsoft. And if that's true I think it would be sad.
@mcc @fishidwardrobe @dangillmor But that's stuff you *want* to do, not *have* to do, and yes I'm a pedantic asshole, sorry in advance. The way I look at it is I get Windows for free, and that's the price you pay for it. It's a trade-off I feel is worth it.

@blakeyrat @mcc @fishidwardrobe @dangillmor you don’t get it for free though. even if it comes with your device, manufacturers pay microsoft licensing fees to include it by default, which drives up the cost of their devices.

and even if that weren’t the case, i strongly disagree with allowing that to simply be the “price you pay,” when it comes with all sorts of social ills

@blakeyrat @mcc @dangillmor Speaking personally I find there is a large gap between "I found it neccessary to do X" and "I wanted to do X". Not at all the same thing.

Nor am I sure you are getting Windows for free in any real sense, unless off Pirate Bay?

Just my POV; don't know that MCC would agree.

@fishidwardrobe @mcc @dangillmor You're out-of-date, Windows is free-free now, you can just download the ISO. IIRC the only difference between that and a "licensed" version is it puts a little watermark on the wallpaper.
@blakeyrat @fishidwardrobe @dangillmor I would consider it a requirement, not a "nice-to-have", that a corporation not surveil me while I am using my personal computer. This is why I have switched to Linux in the first place (because I have seen the future and it is "Recall").
@mcc @blakeyrat @dangillmor I'd certainly agree that Windows is trying to make it so you don't use the command line. Rightly or wrongly.
@mcc @dangillmor Appreciate the attempt at getting to root causes to ideally resolve the issues. Hope it works out for you as someone who just reached my 1-yr anniversary of Linux as my daily driver. I've had my fair share of frustrating experiences as well and realized that the desktop environment and the graphical display system are two very large contributing factors that are hard to fully account for re: troubleshooting. Things are much more positive than negative nowadays and I will never pay for an OS again, but the initial learning curve can be brutal