593: Not a European Lawyer
https://atp.fm/593
The EU giveth, and Apple taketh away.
593: Not a European Lawyer
https://atp.fm/593
The EU giveth, and Apple taketh away.
@Gregnee @siracusa I know cookies and the silly popup banners are the thing everyone keeps pointing to to say how bad EU legislation can be. But by and large, GDPR did what it was supposed to do: define what kind of data companies are allowed to store on people and what their responsibilities are in terms of keeping that data safe and up to date.
Yes it can be a hassle, but the hassle means companies default to storing only the data they really need for the job. It works pretty well imho.
@siracusa Agree on both points, especially the second. But there’s been sentiment in various podcasts that interprets the DMA as being targeted at Apple, which I think is a misreading.
The EU has always been against closed vertical integration in the Single Market (see also: Fourth Rail Package, Third Energy Package for reference). This is more at odds with Apple’s “whole widget” mindset and less with Google and Microsoft, but that doesn’t mean it was written in response to Apple specifically.
@markv @siracusa I think the article linked by @ridogi here: https://mastodon.social/@ridogi/112690752890830323 sums things up perfectly.
In the EU producing regulation is more like a group discussion with the teacher than an edict from on high. I work in the insurance industry in the EU. We are (necessarily) heavily regulated both nationally and at the EU level. All changes to regulations are flagged multiple years in advance with pre-implementation discussions *with* the regulators.
1/
@markv @siracusa @ridogi the DMA wasn't written in a vacuum. There was an initial proposal made about it in 2020. Two years later it was passed and entered into force in November 2022, and was effective from May 2023. I guarantee before there was a proposal there were attempts to engage with relevant parties.
That's at least two years Apple had to engage and effect change in the regulation, and a further year during which they had the opportunity to push for necessary amendments.
2/
@markv @siracusa @ridogi Apple chose, instead of engagement, to say "we don't need to change and you are wrong to try make us change". That is on Apple, not the EC.
Fundamentally the EU is protective of its market as a whole not individual companies. It doesn't make regulation to spite non-EU companies or to favour EU companies. See insurance regulation, the bulk of the insurers to who this regulation applies are European.
EU company preference is effected through trade negotiations. 3/3
@illustro @siracusa @ridogi I work in the EU chemical industry and have seen very similar things. Current ongoing industry working groups are about regulations expected for 2027/2028. There are working groups on every piece of regulation from chemical safety (REACH) to carbon tax (eg CBAM) and sustainability (Green Deal). This includes customers, suppliers, academics, etc.
My guess is Apple saw the DMA as a threat and used all their lobbying power to try stopping it instead of shaping it.
@atpfm RE: John’s comments @ 29:00:
I completely agree that the system Apple has proposed is odd and definitely convoluted…
…but as a person who is interested in cars but not a “car person”, I 100% view my car as an appliance, and have exactly zero attachment to the design choices made by my car’s manufacturer. I would have no qualms enabling a setting to overwrite their notoriously bad UI’s.
@siracusa @Janne_O No arguments there — I think their proposal for 2.0 is fraught and likely DOA — but in terms of being an owner wanting the car’s brand integrity in the UI to remain intact, I couldn’t care less.
I may very well be in the minority in viewing my car as an appliance, but I think not. I think it’s another manifestation of the collective opinion towards GM abandoning CarPlay: whatever the manufacturer puts together is less important than my phone integration.
Come on you guys. iExit is sitting right there!
@atpfm I learned a lot from this link about the EU.
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] Because you, like Gruber, have no idea what the EU is, and what it does, and come it it with an extremely limited view of "whatever a supranational US corporation does is good actually". This is a good overview of what people are missing: https://www.baldurbjarnason.com/2024/facing-reality-in-the-eu-and-tech/
@atpfm member special covering each host’s car trip packing. 🤩
Also, having packed for many weekends that included various combinations of a large, three-burner gas stove, multiple canopies, picnic tables, food for 40, a full camp kitchen, a six foot wooden sled, etc … you can massively up your cargo game on any vehicle with those $15/day 4x8 trailers from U-Haul.
The only downside is they fit tires with speed ratings around 60mph.
@atpfm Hopefully there is some way the EC can clarify things around those features Apple is holding back, because I really struggle to see how a feature on the Mac is affected by the DMA, even if the feature is all about accessing your iPhone.
In that case especially it feels like Apple is just being punitive.
@odin @atpfm one of the gatekeeper designations the EC has made in relation to Apple is that the "AppStore" is a Core Platform service for intermediation: https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/gatekeepers_en
That AppStore isn't just on iOS, it's all of Apple's platforms (in part because Apple has designed it as a single system, see iPad apps being submitted once but available on everything but watch and phone)
So the Mac is covered here too re interoperability
Attached: 1 image @[email protected] Apple: "We are highly motivated to bring new features to every user..." Take a look at this screenshot of the iOS keyboard in my language: Notice anything missing? In iOS 8(!) TEN years ago, Apple launched word predictions. Guess how much I believe Apple... I also think I can serve as a good test for Apple's claim: Norway is _not_ in the EU (I can't download app stores) - so we'll see how many iOS 18 features I get...
@atpfm For what it's worth, as a 16-inch MacBook Pro user who carries his laptop to and from work and travels regularly, I wouldn't mind at all if Apple explored making these systems a bit lighter and thinner if the resulting tradeoffs were acceptable.
My old 2015 15-inch MacBook Pro weighed 4.49 pounds, and my 2019 16-inch MacBook Pro weighed 4.3 pounds.
My new 16-inch M3 Max MacBook Pro weighs 4.8 pounds, which makes for a noticeable difference in day-to-day life, particularly on a plane.
@atpfm Apple: "We are highly motivated to bring new features to every user..."
Take a look at this screenshot of the iOS keyboard in my language: Notice anything missing?
In iOS 8(!) TEN years ago, Apple launched word predictions. Guess how much I believe Apple...
I also think I can serve as a good test for Apple's claim: Norway is _not_ in the EU (I can't download app stores) - so we'll see how many iOS 18 features I get...
@atpfm The Kia EV9 would be a great choice, @caseyliss. I'd at least look at it!
It's reasonably priced, and the electric platform is terrific. (That's really important to look at.) The EV6 and Ioniq 5, on the same platform, looks way better IMO, though. As a European, those are family sized - but America is different I guess. 😅… (1/2)
(And as a Norwegian, where literally 90% of new cars are EVs, I absolutely don't get the aversion to it, hehe. I drove electric to Southern France and back last year, and it's no issue. Really.)
Another thing I would consider: Imagine if you would rent a car the 2% of times you require the most from your car. Which car would you then need for the 98%? You would probably save more than you pay in rent.
(And speaking of mini vans: The VW Buzz is also pretty good!) (2/2)
iExit: name for threatened Apple EU action