@jwildeboer who doesn't understand this?
Who is saying, "Let them have it"?
You read different newspapers and posts than I do
@jwildeboer @codebyjeff I guess I'm reading the same newspapers then. And so do many of my friends.
Letting Ukraine give up whatever Putin claims, seems to be the best solution to end the war, according to many.
I disagree, btw. Strongly.
@treetreed @codebyjeff @jwildeboer
"let russia have it so there can be peace" appeasement, choosing not to understand that Putin wants all of Ukraine, is necessary because to admit it means they would build a neural pathway to acknowledge that what Israel wants is all of Palestine - and then even more.
but they can't let themselves say it
@jwildeboer And when you remind them of the history, they answer with “yeah but it’s mainly Russians and Ukrainians sympathetic to Russia living there anyway”. Conveniently forgetting why that is.
Just like there weren’t that many Jews in Europe anyway during WW2?
@dcoderlt @jwildeboer The key word is “adequately”. The person who routinely, aggressively, with a singular focus that either doesn’t respond to criticism or argues against it in bad faith, promotes “anti-war” rhetoric that depends on Ukraine losing its own territory is not being used; the person who repeats these bad faith arguments amidst a slew of other attitudes that are generally anti-war IS being used.
We should not retire tools that remain useful.
@jwildeboer When Hitler was allowed to annex Sudetenland, there would be "peace for our time".
Didn't exactly work out like that though.
It is a current MAGA talking point that "#Russia wants peace." Or: "Russia wants a #ceasefire." Each phrase translates as "I am an asset of the #Kremlin."
Saying Putin wants a ceasefire is like saying Hitler wanted peace in Poland in 1939. Sure he does...
If #Putin "wants peace" in #Ukraine, he could have it today.
How? by GETTING EVERY FUCKING RUSSIAN BOOT, TANK, AIRCRAFT AND DRONE OUT OF THE COUNTRY RIGHT NOW. Then there would be peace.
If he wants that, let him prove it.
@lxo @jwildeboer
Noone can be this fucking stupid. So, I'm guessing troll.
Nevertheless, on the off-chance this is genuine:
- Russia inviting Ukraine to join BRICS would be legitimate and reasonable. Same as NATO inviting them to join. Or the EU.
- Russia sending tanks in a neighboring country is neither legitimate, nor reasonable. Acts of war seldom are.
It's not the desire to improve their world standing that separates Russia and the west. It's the means they're using to obtain it.
@bgrinter @jwildeboer @timrichards
A little piece of Türkiye, a little piece of Greece,
Just hand over Moldova, then the war will cease,
I'll be wanting Poland, and Belarus is mine,
Don't need to have Jamaica, just Cuba will be fine,
Some pieces that are Slovak, some pieces that are Czech,
All my former Baltic states, and Finland, what the heck,
I'm feeling I want Hungary, and also Kazakhstan,
And Uzbek, Kyrgyz, Tajik, all the way into Iran...
@jwildeboer crimea should have triggered a full western response. I said so then.
I also asked why Putin was still walking around still alive. I still ask this question.
I certainly do, and you put it quite well.
@jwildeboer
> Russia wants all of Ukraine and then even more. Why do so many people not understand this?
Spoiler: they do understand this.
@jwildeboer once upon a time hitler wanted czechoslovakia and we let him take it and Europe became peaceful and lived happily ever after
Wait, sorry, that's not how the story goes
They do not understand it, because a man is deaf, mute, and blind when his livelihood depends on it.
In other words, they are paid by Russia.
@jwildeboer It's like when my mother-in-law's brother hit her and she cried to her mother and her mother said, "If you wouldn't cry, he wouldn't hit you."
If you wouldn't resist Russia, it would not have to invade. / `~`
This is really abusive, blame-the-victim, messed up logic.