Looking for paper suggestions!

I'm teaching a class in Neuroecology for first year PhD students and part of it is a journal club.

I'm looking for additional, pure behavior papers that study "natural" / ecological behaviors, if possible not in mice.
And also for rather short papers that perform any form of brain recordings during natural /ecological behaviors (plus points if not in mice).

Any suggestions?
#Neuroecology #behaviors #neuroscience #teaching

@Katja_Reinhard Not a nerobiologist, but have you thought about Ken Catania's work on electric eel hunting behavior? I am not sure if that is what you are looking for, but you may want to check it out.
@Drosmel excellent suggestion, thank you!

@Katja_Reinhard I’m afraid that any paper that does both “ecological behaviour” and neural recordings would be anything but short… also super rare, but it depends what you mean by “ecological”.

For example I like to use this paper in journal clubs because it has some obvious flaws: Social place-cells in the bat hippocampus - but is it ecological? Not really - it’s recorded in a lab during a human-made task…

Happy to provide more examples if you can narrow down a bit what you mean by ecological! :)

@elduvelle true, these terms aren't very clear. Imo a behavior can still be natural or ecologically relevant, I. E. It's a behavior the animal would do in its natural habitat, even when it is recorded in a lab setting.
I'm currently doing papers like Cheriyamkunnel et al. on circuits for feeding vs sexual behavior in fruit flies, Oliva et al. on escaping crabs or Hoy et al. on hunting mice. But I'd like to add some new ones this year which aren't about escape and if possible not in mice. Many papers that measure neural activity are focusing on learned behaviors or on perturbation. So any suggestion of a paper you like is welcome.
True behavior-only papers with solid analysis aren't so easy either. My examples include Peromyscus burrowing and Shrimp - Cleaner fish interactions.
@elduvelle BTW the bat papers are a good suggestion which for some reason I didn't include last time.
@Katja_Reinhard @elduvelle So would you consider two-photon microscopy of the antennal lobe in honeybees trained on floral odors? People like Brian Smith have shown how the antennal lobe rewires itself to be a better mixture discriminator, allowing for generalized learning of floral rewards despite significant variance in odor boquet within a single species of flower.

@Katja_Reinhard @elduvelle Example publication using 2p calcium-dye imaging to better understand plasticity of antennal lobe for ecologically relevant odor learning tasks:

https://www.jneurosci.org/content/29/33/10191.short

And two more as well:

https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/223/1/jeb206748/224580/Experience-dependent-tuning-of-early-olfactory

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00359-013-0805-y

Associative Conditioning Tunes Transient Dynamics of Early Olfactory Processing

Odors evoke complex spatiotemporal responses in the insect antennal lobe (AL) and mammalian olfactory bulb. However, the behavioral relevance of spatiotemporal coding remains unclear. In the present work we combined behavioral analyses with calcium imaging of odor induced activity in the honeybee AL to evaluate the relevance of this temporal dimension in the olfactory code. We used a new way for evaluation of odor similarity of binary mixtures in behavioral studies, which involved testing whether a match of odor-sampling time is necessary between training and testing conditions for odor recognition during associative learning. Using graded changes in the similarity of the mixture ratios, we found high correlations between the behavioral generalization across those mixtures and a gradient of activation in AL output. Furthermore, short odor stimuli of 500 ms or less affected how well odors were matched with a memory template, and this time corresponded to a shift from a sampling-time-dependent to a sampling-time-independent memory. Accordingly, 375 ms corresponded to the time required for spatiotemporal AL activity patterns to reach maximal separation according to imaging studies. Finally, we compared spatiotemporal representations of binary mixtures in trained and untrained animals. AL activity was modified by conditioning to improve separation of odor representations. These data suggest that one role of reinforcement is to “tune” the AL such that relevant odors become more discriminable.

Journal of Neuroscience
@Katja_Reinhard @elduvelle There's a lot of hippocampal stuff in bats (q.v. Nachum Ulanovsky) and birds (q.v. Dmitriy Aronov, which connects with the extensive work on caching by Nicki Clayton). Of course, there's also the classic oxytocin data from voles. And, of course, the extensive birdsong literature (try some of the ones from Michael Brainard and Alison Doupe).
@adredish @elduvelle thanks! The caching in birds is a good idea!
@Katja_Reinhard Not sure that's what you're after but you could look into Augustin Ibáñez's work. He is interested in human cognition "in the wild". For example in this paper https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.07.008

@Katja_Reinhard this sounds like neuroethology to me (or is there a difference?). There are textbooks with lots of examples and references: "The Neuroethology of Predation and Escape" is one, "Neuroethology
An Introduction to the Neurophysiological Fundamentals of Behavior" is another one.

Konishi's work on learning in songbirds, Knudsen's work on audio-spatial localization in barn owls, Narin's work on frog calls, ... there is a lot to draw from and it's a fun topic. Best wishes on the class!

@sls I call my course Neuroecology because we also discuss the environment that influences or selected for certain behaviors.

Indeed, I've gone through several books and the examples there are used in my lectures to explain concepts, but it has turned out to be less trivial than expected to find papers where animals aren't taught/rewarded, that have both high quality behavior and high quality neural data (with interesting analysis), don't focus on manipulations, and aren't too complicated to present in a reasonable amount of time for a first year PhD student.

I'll check out the frog calls and barn owls though, I don't think I went through those yet.

The JCs that are part of this course focus on discussing if/why the tested behaviors are natural, the appropriateness of the assay and analysis, and the possible confounders and impact of the experimental environment. Last year's discussions have been excellent and I hope to renew my paper selection for this edition.

@Katja_Reinhard not sure if this is what you're looking for, but this is a great study on social interactions in macaques with wireless recordings #electrophysiology #neuroscience : https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.05.547833v3.full
@Katja_Reinhard Seconding the suggestions for bird call literature, and wondering if you would consider something as simple as c. elegans? There is some interesting work at the circuit level regarding behaviors like egg laying, for example.
@seanpatrickphd I would consider simple things if the assay/analysis has enough substance for a discussion (beyond eg simple quantification of behavior vs no behavior). I actually have some CO2 and light sensing in water flees as an example in my lecture.
I'll check out the egg laying literature!
@Katja_Reinhard there’s some great work out there on pigeon cognition and their pattern recognition and spatial memory and navigation abilities, especially some studies in homing pigeons I think

@Katja_Reinhard You may be interested in Antoine Wystrach's work on ant navigation. I think there's neurobiological studies as well as behavioural ones in natural conditions in his work.

An exemple : https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/215/1/44/10799/Ants-might-use-different-view-matching-strategies

Ants might use different view-matching strategies on and off the route

SUMMARYIndividual foraging ants are known to rely on views of their surroundings for route learning and for pinpointing goals. Different strategies have been proposed to explain how ants might process visual information for navigation, but little is known about the actual development and nature of the view-based strategies used by ants in complex natural environments. Here, we constrained the knowledge of Melophorus bagoti ants to either the nest vicinity or a curved route (length 10 m) and analysed their initial direction when released at both novel and familiar locations. In parallel, we used 360 deg pictures of the scene as a basis for modelling different navigational strategies. We propose here a new hypothesis based on skyline height comparison to explain how ants home from novel locations. Interestingly, this strategy succeeded well at novel locations but failed on familiar terrain. By contrast, the use of a visual compass strategy failed at novel locations but could explain the results on familiar routes. We suggest that ants might switch between skyline height comparison and a visual compass strategy, depending on whether they are on familiar terrain or not. How ants could switch between strategies and how their memories develop are discussed in turn.

The Company of Biologists

@Katja_Reinhard Nowadays labs transitioning from model lab mice to ml model mice: So adding more abstraction layers from biological ecological reality!

Key question! please follow w/ listing outside-the-lab research!

No refs, but fieldwork research with wales and/or macaques speaking/singing...

#LarsChittka lab team top creative & innovative #bees fieldworks:
#hivemind vs indiv. #mind!

ie: capture & install of tiny antenna x harmonic radar individuals tracking

~21min
https://inv.tux.pizza/watch?v=Iut33k3MHyI&t=1260s

The Mind of a Bee | Lars Chittka

Most of us are aware of the hive mind — the power of bees as an amazing collective. But do we know how uniquely intelligent bees are as individuals? In this lecture Lars Chittka explores the bees' remarkable cognitive abilities. You will learn that they are profoundly smart, have distinct personalities, can recognize flowers and human faces, exhibit basic emotions, count, use simple tools, solve problems, and learn by observing others. They may even possess consciousness. He will take you deep into the sensory world of bees, and illustrate how bee brains are unparalleled in the animal kingdom in terms of how much sophisticated material is packed into their tiny nervous systems. He will also examine the psychological differences between bees and the ethical dilemmas that arise in conservation and laboratory settings because bees feel and think. Exploring an insect whose sensory experiences rival those of humans, he will explore the singular abilities of some of the world’s most incredible creatures. Lars Chittka FLS, FRES, FRSB is a professor at Queen Mary, University of London, where he founded a new Research Centre for Psychology in 2008, and was its scientific director until 2012. Chittka is a world authority on the behaviour, cognition and ecology of bumblebees and honeybees, and their interactions with flowers. He discovered that bees can count, learn by observing each other and have a rich inner world of sensations and memories. Chittka is a recipient of the Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award (2014), an ERC Advanced Grant (2013) and the Lesley Goodman Award of the Royal Entomological Society (2006). The Linnean Society works to inform, involve and inspire people of all ages about nature and its wider interactions through our collections, programmes and publications. Founded in 1788, the Society takes its name from the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778). https://www.linnean.org Follow us on social media: https://www.twitter.com/LinneanSociety https://www.instagram.com/linneansociety https://www.facebook.com/linneansociety

Linnean Society | Invidious
@teixi thanks for the link, I'm familiar with his work. my own lab is also working with non model organisms, hence also my choice to teach Neuroecology to our students.