| blog website | https://seanpatrick.phd |
| follow blog on fedi | @seanpatrick.phd |
| pronouns | they/them |
| new instance | @seanpatrickphd |
| blog website | https://seanpatrick.phd |
| follow blog on fedi | @seanpatrick.phd |
| pronouns | they/them |
| new instance | @seanpatrickphd |
#WritersCoffeeClub 2/3 Do you agree w/ Thomas Mann: "A writer is a person for whom writing is more difficult than for other people."
Probably true - but maybe only because someone who defines themselves by an activity tends to rise to greater challenges in that domain. The same would be true of a boxer, or an actor, etc. -- the task becomes more difficult because the doer is more capable.
Alternately - does having difficulty with writing predispose one toward writing? I'm not sure. Doubt it.
sonnet for a fly
This world is air, that flutters with the breeze;#EngenderedWriting 86 If your story sticks to traditional gender roles, what does the story lose?
I would argue it probably loses a dimension of humanity in the characters it portrays. Most humans don't fit neatly into a gender role. Portraying characters that only conform to their gender role (traditional or otherwise) loses some veridicality to the actual human experience. Is it possible to tell a story that way? Sure, but it loses something important about the human condition.
#WritersCoffeeClub 2/2 Do you analyze structure and technique in other writers' work?
Fortunately or unfortunately, I don't have a formal education in writing, so I'm blissfully unaware of most formal writing structure and technique. I do analyze grammar and spelling unconsciously, and when reading poetry I do analyze meter and rhyme. But beyond a basic level, I don't think I'm equipped to analyze other people's work.
Humans live and die and life goes on. You weren’t born to do anything, necessarily. You were born and everything that's happened since then has been icing on the cake. Do something if you want to. Life will go on either way.
You’re doing what you’re doing and that’s enough. Enjoy it.
(4/4)
I think it’s important to do something for the love of it, regardless of its utility.
When I was 18, I cared about leaving the earth better than I found it. I don’t anymore. The earth will be fine. I may as well spend my time doing something I enjoy.
So what’s my point? I guess it’s, do what you love. Your legacy doesn’t matter. Your work doesn’t matter. None of it matters. And that’s OK.
(3/4)