I gotta admit. Your previous post was completely incomprehensible to me.
Solidly out of the left field.
Nature
Nature, mainly because it is fairly easy to deal with the email thing - but not so easy to learn if you're robbing from peter to pay paul, and don't have a spare $199
anyway...need a temporary address that goes to nowhere.
https://www.emailondeck.com/
@betalars
Doubly funny because there is nothing in your reply that helps. Unlike the following:
@[email protected] #AltText4You. A pair of screenshots: The first is from The NY Times. An article is titled “Everyone wants your email address. Think twice before sharing it.” It has a pop-up window which demands an email address to continue reading. Then an article from Nature magazine, titled “The growing inaccessibility of science”. To read the article, one must subscribe to the journal, at a cost of $199 per year.
Okay. First of all I'm going to admit I didn't even notice it was from 1992. 😂
The meme is probably not from 1992.
I've never figured out the rhyme or reason to what articles are free or not. Sometimes the really old ones are. Sometimes the ones from the '80s are, sometimes they're not. I don't know. 🤷♀️
Maybe the decision is made by how much they get cited, therefore purchased. Who knows.
@beastoftraal uh huh
Want me to read your articles? TAKE DOWN THE PAYWALLS
@beastoftraal I wonder after how many articles Nature shows this 'pay us' requester as I got article for free.
And there is always scihub :D
@beastoftraal 😂 exactly.
I miss the old, pre-JavaScript internet 😭
@beastoftraal Joseph Heller did it best.
Also, most of these shenanigans can be bypassed by plugging the url into archive.is/.org